"Diketones are bad"
"Diketiones are bad in situation x, not necessarily in situation y"
"If they're bad in situation x, it stands to reason they're bad in situation y too, that's why I avoid them"
"That's fine, if you want to avoid them, avoid them"
"And I think everyone else should avoid them too"
"It's fine for you to think that, some people think differently"
"They're bad so they should be removed from the industry and every vendor that doesn't remove them is a horrible person"
"Well, that's going a little far, given that there's no real evidence that they're bad in
vaping"
"Dr. F says they're bad"
"Dr. F says they're an 'avoidable risk' but he also said 'In many cases, levels of these compounds are absolutely minimal, and it is NOT expected to raise any concerns about human health effects.' so really he's just guessing."
"I'll take the opinion of a doctor over a random internet person, thanks"
"again, you're free to do whatever you like, but when you try to push that view onto others, you're starting to sound like an ANTZ"
"I'm not an ANTZ, I'm a concerned vaper"
"I didn't say you were an ANTZ, I said you sound like one, as in you're jumping to conclusions based on little to no evidence, and trying to push your views on an entire industry."
Did I sum that up correctly?