You can't?
which isn't worth a hill of beans.They cannot Tax it more than they tax any other Nicotine Replacement Therapy.
IMO the FDA just wants the whole mess to go away. They don't have any idea of how the e-cig industry should be regulated, so they just want to sweep the whole deal under the rug by using Chapter IX. We should be telling them to "do their damn job", but do it properly.
I don't own a PV that can't be used to power a flashlight bulb, so how in the world could they regulate them. In fact I have a few flashlights that would power an atomizer quite nicely.Almost everything we use to vape is also used for other things ..... including nicotine.
I bought a bunch of PG and VG from a soap supply company yesterday.
IMO it's the noob that wants to try vaping as a way to stop smoking that is going to get hurt by all this. Those of us that have been around the block a few times will do just fine.

How will they justify it? If they raise taxes on nicotine liquid as in e-liquid, they have to raise taxes on All the nicotine replacement therapies currently available and especially those which contain or use nicotine liquid. For me it's that simple.Who says? This is the government we're talking about.
If they raise taxes on nicotine liquid as in e-liquid, they have to raise taxes on All the nicotine replacement therapies currently available and especially those which contain or use nicotine liquid.
They will tax the hell out of nicotine and possibly delivery devices. This way they make up for lost taxes. I wonder if they could make pg and vg only available with a permit.
Really? They'll tax VG and PG? because they are not used as ingredients in any other products?
Have we all lost our sensibilities?
Tobacco seeds.
Yes, nicotine extraction is probably difficult and certainly dangerous, but I have no doubt it is doable.
The more likely scenario would be gray/black market imports.