Having started w/ a xhaleo2, moved onto a 510 auto and PT, then eGo and have added to my collection the SmokeStik RN4081 and a KR8 mega, I really don't understand WHY everyone suggests to new members that the 510 is the best. It clearly(to me anyway) is not. I am assuming that people who recomend the 510 haven't tried other e-cigs, but that isn't so. I see people who use eGos and mods recomending the (feeble) 510. In it's auto form it is lousy due to it's microphone activation switch, only worse was my xhaleo2 from 7-11. In it's manual form, it's 'OK', but certainly not the best. About equal to a DSE901 in terms of voltage(3.2v), accessory availability and fog maker ability. Nothing THAT special. I am afraid that people new to e-cigs may try a 510 on the advice of someone on here, and decide after hearing things like "It is the standard when it comes to e-cigs", that they will decide that there is no e-cig that works well enough for them. I loved my 510, in comparison to the xhaleo2. But within a week ordered an eGo first chance I got. And the 510 was left aside for backup(which it served well as when an eGo batt died). But, after trying SmokeStik autos(the closest PV to a real cig I've tried) and a KR8, I just cannot for the life of me figure out what is so special about the little 510. At about the same size, the KR8 has higher voltage, higher mAh, generally the same or lower price, and a vacuum activated auto switch which works rather well. Granted, the SS kits are not cheap so I do understand why not many have tried them, but they are the best cig replacement PV there is IMHO. I DO understand that everyone has their own likes and dislikes about their particular PV. I just cannot understand why the 510 is reguarded as "the best e-cig for newbs". Please elaborate any response as to why it is better, and also take part in the poll. I really would like the facts. TY