It's these kind of people that are going to ruin it for all of us...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robert Cromwell

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2015
14,009
65,472
elsewhere
I hope my post didnt give you that impression snork for thats farthest from the truth for me. I believe we all have a right to vape anyway we want. The point I was pushing is that we also have a responsibility to be courteous in our vaping so we do not turn the general public against us. We have enough things going against us already with all the lies our opponents are telling without also shooting ourselves in the foot.
All the bad plubicity from vapors, none of it that I am aware of was from tootie puffers. Its always the sub ohm cloud chasers that are to blame. Thats not saying all cloud chasers are bad or disrespectful. What it is really saying is that the cloud chasing is so damn cool that it has attracted a bad element to it. The kids that got vaping banned from the LSU campus. I doubt if we will ever see a single one here debating these points for they care less. They wanted attention and thats exactly what they got. Same with Wal-mart guy. He doesnt give a single hoot about how people view vapors. The cloud chasers who got vaping banned in bars. They too are part of the bad element that shines a bad light on cloud chasers and its not fair in the least to those here who do vape responsibly with their sub ohm drippers and high watt mods.
The responsible sub ohmers here have been given a raw deal by the bad element that cloud chases. In my opinion, if we are to win even a little bit in the end then we need public opinion on our side. Every person who quits smoking from vaping is a mark in the win column for us and an increase in positive public acceptance. By advocating responsible vaping we keep the positive momentum going.

Yep every group has a minority that messes it up for everyone else in the group. Pedo-priests for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raqball

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
These threads always become about every reason that vaping is getting banned.

There are nuggets of truth in all the reasons. Even those creating the legislation have no real clue what true vaping is all about. Most have never even seen a PV. All they know are the commercials they see on TV regarding the cig-a-likes or the Blu type. Even the FDA are clueless.

Yes, there is disrespect in EVERY area. From the people that have their bass going in their cars in the middle of the night, to parents who let their kids run wild at restaurants, to people who don't care who they offend with whatever.

It has become a sad state of affairs when the minority of offenders take precedence over the millions of respectful people. It just goes to show, those that cry get rewarded.

Jerks are in all walks of life and in EVERY type of activity. Do we blame all of the participants of that activity? Or do we really see what it truly is....ONE person acting like a jerk.

To say that a certain segment of the vaping community is ruining it for all of us is not a true statement. The JERKS (whom are probably jerks no matter what they are doing) are just that....

The best that we can hope to do is present ourselves, individually, as we would like to be perceived. We only have control over what we do as individuals. We can try to educate, but if we hide....who are we educating? If we vape responsibly, we can educate and show that it isn't all a cloud chasing competition. Cloud competitions have their place. At least they still have a place to do it.

This is human nature, to push the boundaries. It happened with snow boarding, race car driving etc. They have their place. Let them.

Innovation happens when we let them push the boundaries. We would not have devices that are more effective and easier to use if those boundaries had not been pushed.

We are all vapers.

[HASHTAG]#vapingsavedmylife[/HASHTAG] [HASHTAG]#notblowingsmoke[/HASHTAG]
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
I guess this is no different than how some people could smoke 2-3 packs of cigarettes a day.

Exactly right. Some people have a hard time finishing a pk a day... some of us smoked 3 pks a day. I take as kindly to "why can't you go [x amount of time] without a vape?" as I did to "why do you smoke so much?" Because I want to, that's all the reason that's necessary; no one else's input or opinion is needed.

Andria
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
Although the vapor might not a hazard to health, people have the right to have clear air.... With the clouds that we make, if it is in public place of course it will get other people cranky.
I do stealth vape though with minimal vapor.

If people really do have a "right to clear air"... why are there cars? Why are they all over the place? Why is there an interstate system on which to drive those cars?

Andria
 
  • Like
Reactions: raqball

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
We all probably agree on that.
The problem I have is that some feel that it shouldn't go both ways. Why is it assumed that if we puff out a clouds of harmless vapor in temporary situations, it is not a "right" we have which should be respected? Whether we vape or not we still exhale, vapor just makes it visible. It's like we need to apologize for being alive.

YESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!

Andria
 

chopdoc

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2014
3,292
12,571
Independence, Louisiana, United States
I did not see anything in that IN law that prohibits DIY. Please show anything differing from that.
Its not that it prohibits it, it makes it finacially impossible for the home DIYer to be able to do.

Requires a manufacturer of e-liquid to obtain a permit from the alcohol and tobacco commission before bottling e-liquid or selling e-liquid to retailers or distributors. Provides that the initial application for a manufacturing permit must include: (1) plans for the applicant's manufacturing facility; (2) a service agreement between the applicant and a security firm requiring the security firm to certify that the manufacturer meets certain security requirements; and (3) an application fee of $1,000. Provides that a manufacturer's permit is valid for five years and establishes requirements for permit renewal, including a $500 permit renewal application fee.

Sorry, but law works a certain way and it isn't always easy for the average person to understand, so I'll try again.

If you look at the laws governing beer production in Indiana you will see 3 different definitions. Commercial, craft, and personal use. The law as written applies to commercial production. Craft has their own exemptions and specific other regulations. DIY (personal use) has its own exemptions and specified limits. So, 3 different defined producers and 3 different regulations.

HB 1432 has one definition of juice production, commercial. Thus all juice production is considered commercial under the law because nothing else is defined and nothing is excluded. If it did not include DIY then DIY would be defined and limits set to differentiate DIY from another type of production.

Since DIY is NOT defined, NOR specifically exempted, it is the same thing as commercial production as far as the agency is concerned and the only definition a court could rule on.

Just because it isn't included, doesn't mean the law doesn't apply. Laws on murder do not include redheaded step children, but if one murders one it is still murder. And if a redheaded step child murders a non-redheaded stepchild, the redhead is still guilty of murder.

Does that make it make sense now?

(I keep seeing the confusion on DIY for this law and it seems to orbit the fact that DIY isn't specified, but commercial is, but that just means that any juice production is commercial juice production in the eyes of the law. Common sense doesn't apply to laws, nor hidebound ATC agents.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: KattMamma

Robert Cromwell

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2015
14,009
65,472
elsewhere
Its not that it prohibits it, it makes it finacially impossible for the home DIYer to be able to do.

Requires a manufacturer of e-liquid to obtain a permit from the alcohol and tobacco commission before bottling e-liquid or selling e-liquid to retailers or distributors. Provides that the initial application for a manufacturing permit must include: (1) plans for the applicant's manufacturing facility; (2) a service agreement between the applicant and a security firm requiring the security firm to certify that the manufacturer meets certain security requirements; and (3) an application fee of $1,000. Provides that a manufacturer's permit is valid for five years and establishes requirements for permit renewal, including a $500 permit renewal application fee.


That is for manufactured ejuice not DIY ingredients. None of the DIY ingredients I buy states that they are intended for making ecig ejuice, not even the nicotine. Nothing I have read impacts an individual buying the ingredients and making ejuice for their own consumption, they just cannot sell the juice they make to others without being permitted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndriaD

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
I wonder how many advocating for vape anywhere regardless of it's appropriateness or it's lack of common courtesy would sub ohm and blow fog machine'esk clouds in a hospital, a cancer center, a day care or their church?

I have been in this thread from the beginning. I have posted in this thread a few times and it is on my watched list. Just because someone states that they choose to vape anywhere they are not saying that they are choosing to sub ohm anywhere.

There are ways that people can vape anywhere and no one be the wiser. I can vape anywhere and if nothing comes out of my mouth....am I really vaping? To anyone watching me....they would just think I was chewing on my drip tip.

I do not sub ohm. Never have, never tried.
 

Rocketpunk

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 14, 2012
4,338
7,442
Dayton, Ohio
I wonder how many advocating for vape anywhere regardless of it's appropriateness or it's lack of common courtesy would sub ohm and blow fog machine'esk clouds in a hospital, a cancer center, a day care or their church?

You'd be surprised, dude. I've met people who have done all four. Seriously.
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
I did not see anything in that IN law that prohibits DIY. Please show anything differing from that.
Sec. 15."Manufacturer"means a person or cooperative,located inside or outside Indiana, that is engaged in manufacturing e-liquid
https://iga.in.gov/static-documents/4/a/8/2/4a82456e/HB1432.07.ENRH.pdf

there it is in black and white. it says a person (not a business).
notice they include cooperative.they are nonprofit by
definition and need not be even incorporated.
it could be a few DIY'ers getting together and buying
materials in bulk to save money.
:2c:
regards
mike
 

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,604
35,895
Naptown, Indiana
I did not see anything in that IN law that prohibits DIY. Please show anything differing from that.

Take a look in the regulations forum. Hoosier posted a breakdown of this question. The Indiana organization has people with expertise in legislation and they have studied the wording of the Bill. I don't understand this stuff, but apparently if DIY was to be exempted from the regs it would have had to be specifically exempted in the wording. It wasn't, so by default it is included and an individual making juice will fall under the definition of manufacturer. Hoosier compared it with the regs covering brewing. There is a specific exemption for people who brew beer at home for their own consumption. This is just how legislative language works.

That doesn't mean they will enforce it. It might be impractical for them to do that, or they might not feel the need to. They probably don't care about a handful of DIY'ers. They just want to stop vaping taking hold among the overall smoking population.
 

Spidey2011

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 19, 2014
473
877
Baker, MT
I wonder how many advocating for vape anywhere regardless of it's appropriateness or it's lack of common courtesy would sub ohm and blow fog machine'esk clouds in a hospital, a cancer center, a day care or their church?
I advocate vaping anywhere and wouldn't blow giant clouds in a hospital. Spent many hours in waiting rooms recently dealing with side effects from a concussion. Migraines like you wouldn't believe. Wearing dark sunglasses and using my big sig 100+. But guess what? No one ever saw any vapor and I was never asked to stop. Wasn't trying to hide it then either. Vaping was about the only thing keeping me sane. Lol.

I did have a couple nurses ask what it was when they called me back, but I explained it to them and they said, "Oh ok. Good to see you off cigarettes!"
I can elect to not go to church, problem solved.

Tell us about something else though, like police brutality. Should we ban police?
Yes.
 

raqball

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 22, 2010
4,283
9,282
I have been in this thread from the beginning. I have posted in this thread a few times and it is on my watched list. Just because someone states that they choose to vape anywhere they are not saying that they are choosing to sub ohm anywhere.

There are ways that people can vape anywhere and no one be the wiser. I can vape anywhere and if nothing comes out of my mouth....am I really vaping? To anyone watching me....they would just think I was chewing on my drip tip.

I do not sub ohm. Never have, never tried.

But this thread was started because of someone acting irresponsibly. I am all for vaping anywhere but it needs to be respectful and common sense needs to be applied. My responses in this thread have been based mainly on the topic of it. The iresponsible vapers, not the ones who vape in public responsibly.

Trust me, I am all for vape anywhere --> respectfully and with common sense..
 

Robert Cromwell

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2015
14,009
65,472
elsewhere
Sec. 15."Manufacturer"means a person or cooperative,located inside or outside Indiana, that is engaged in manufacturing e-liquid
https://iga.in.gov/static-documents/4/a/8/2/4a82456e/HB1432.07.ENRH.pdf

there it is in black and white. it says a person (not a business).
notice they include cooperative.they are nonprofit by
definition and need not be even incorporated.
it could be a few DIY'ers getting together and buying
materials in bulk to save money.
:2c:
regards
mike

Under health laws you cannot make food products and sell it without being certified, etc and yet you make food products all the time in your home. You just do not sell it to others.
 

Spidey2011

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 19, 2014
473
877
Baker, MT
Under health laws you cannot make food products and sell it without being certified, etc and yet you make food products all the time in your home. You just do not sell it to others.
Not true. Go to a farmers market and find out just how many people are selling their "uncertified foods." Lol. Horrible comparison.
 

jseah

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 16, 2015
4,112
19,429
Hudson Valley, NY, USA
I dont see how I missed this. Excellent post and thanks for sharing.

This kinda shows that yes indeed BT has plans to corner and dominate the vaping market. As the interviewer stated, BT is already lobbying to stop any vaping delivery systems except what they offer. How much does anyone want to bet that this will be part of the FDA proposed regulations. Our RDA's and RBA's and RTA's will become "medical devices" that will have to meet stringent requirements that will be designed to put an end for sales of them. The only nicotine delivery system that the FDA will give a free pass to is the ones that BT are already marketing.
What's sad is that the best BT delivery system out there in the US is the blu Plus+ mini tank system (it is what I used to quit cigs before I switched to better, and refillable, gear a month and a half later). What's even sadder is in the UK, blu markets the Pro kit, which is basically a user-refillable eGo battery and clearomizer.

So obviously BT wants to maintain the monopoly in the US by requiring that they sell everything, whereas in Europe they have adopted the refillable ability we have now.

Vapour Cigarettes, Vaping Kits - blu UK
 
  • Like
Reactions: chopdoc
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread