I'm not sure it's really "cherry", but maybe the only way my taste buds know how to interpret whatever it is.
That's the original, but not the original. The original , was not obviously a pipe tobacco unless you were luce. The original was what I raved about and was sending everybody and their nephews samples of (and also starting threads about). The original that is being sold now is fine, but it ain't the original.
p.s. I bet someone is reading this wishing we would just go back to acronyms already!
p.s.2 Basically, the first Gandalf had a lower volume of extract, but in retrospect, it was perfect. I am sure someone will read this and wonder how less of the good stuff could make it better, but it was. Also, that is the reason why I used to proclaim that it didn't "need" steep time -- I was referring to a different juice, essentially.
Yep, that was the original. Wish I could get that one again - like you say Sage One, a little less of the good stuff. Wow! Did I really say that? Yes! I did!
Nope! I follow completely, though I wish that you could've tried Gandalf #1. Maybe you can put it out there that Gandalf #1 is supposed to be the original bomb diggy, and that was the one that originally was written about. . . though I can't remember who was writing about it?![]()
Seriously though, I am sure Heather and Adam would do it again.
hmmmm...the original? There was an original Gandalf, but the original Gandalf that was the original is not the original that is sold now. No, not the remix to the second original named Serendipity, but the original before the new original. Ya dig?
That's the original, but not the original. The original , was not obviously a pipe tobacco unless you were luce. The original was what I raved about and was sending everybody and their nephews samples of (and also starting threads about). The original that is being sold now is fine, but it ain't the original.
p.s. Basically, the first Gandalf had a lower volume of extract, but in retrospect, it was perfect. I am sure someone will read this and wonder how less of the good stuff could make it better, but it was. Also, that is the reason why I used to proclaim that it didn't "need" steep time -- I was referring to a different juice, essentially.
Serendipty is Gandalf, but it ain't necessarily -- it's a serendipitous version. Gandalf is not the Gandalf of old either, but maybe I will contact Adam to see if we can complete the trifecta. Hey, worse case scenario is they sell more Gandalf! hahahaha.
p.s. While I do understand the "cherry" notes GT is talking about, I don't exactly equate the two.
Yep, that was the original. Wish I could get that one again - like you say Sage One, a little less of the good stuff. Wow! Did I really say that? Yes! I did!
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Gandy 1.0 = PERFECTION/ECSTASY (Remember when Eleanor Met Gandalf?)
Gandy 2.0 = Serendipity (luscious, but distinctly different)
Gandy 3.0 = Good, BUT NOT GANDY 1.0!!!
I WANT MY GANDALF 1.0 BACK!!!
Mr. Mann, do you suppose H & A could be persuaded to re-release Gandy 1.0? There really is nothing on earth just like it!
OK, I'm going up to my room to pout now.![]()
![]()
Gandy 1 (2 or 3) as a menu item may not be obtainable regardless of whether Adam or any of us want it to be.
Looking at the original reviews (from Eleanor, Ohai, luce, me and billherbst) lets me know that I need to re-engage with Adam. I don't think it should just be a "special" order thing, but IMO it should be a menu item to order. Wish me luck. (I would really love to get my hands on it!)
I just reached out to 1atom12 and I will let you all know how that goes. My fingers are crossed.
We have Gandalf #1, Gandalf #2, and Gandalf #3. We also have Serendipity, which is supposed to be the same as Gandalf #2, but it isn't. So technically it's Gandalf #4. I have 3 of those in my box (the only one I don't have is Gandalf #1), and they are all 3 quite different. You tell me.