New FDA policy conflicts with itself and vaping

Status
Not open for further replies.

listopencil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2017
2,134
8,332
In Partibus Infidelium
Furthermore, the dismal 1.1% to 1.6% per year increase indicates to me that nicotine content likely isn't the focus in the improved farming.

"Other Stuff" seems to have had years within that same time frame where they've not only been able to isolate and choose which of the 2 active ingredients they're farming for, but also had double digit percentage increases in potency of either, or.

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries

I wouldn't be concerned with improved farming so much as the manufacturing processes that cigarette companies use. Like spraying recon tobacco sheets with nic, ammonia, and other chemicals to control the amount of nicotine present in the product as well as the efficiency of nicotine delivery when the product is consumed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ENAUD

stols001

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2017
29,338
108,119
Thanks Bdeck,

I agree that with modern farming a lot can be done to "improve/change" harvest. I'll admit to sometimes wondering if my American Spirit tobacco cans had humectant added in somehow via GMO, because it was never harsh at all. That said, I'm not sure if the ultimate outcome makes a difference.... The fact remains that tobacco is overall becoming more nicotin-ized, though as you say, it may not be much of enough to make a difference....

That said, I'd love to talk to someone in BT industry to find out what exactly does happen as cigarettes are created.... I'm sure there are trade secrets....

Also, I keep meaning to tell you that I adore Jim Jeffries, he's one of my favorite comedians out there! :) OT I know, but every time I see that quote, it gets me laughing. :)

Sorry that work's so intense at the moment :)

Anna
 
  • Like
Reactions: beckdg

beckdg

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 1, 2013
11,018
35,706
TN
I wouldn't be concerned with improved farming so much as the manufacturing processes that cigarette companies use. Like spraying recon tobacco sheets with nic, ammonia, and other chemicals to control the amount of nicotine present in the product as well as the efficiency of nicotine delivery when the product is consumed.
I agree...

But I have no evidence or knowledge that they're spraying nic on cigs.

Seems counter productive in a cost/benefit, but what do I know?

Ammonia (which reportedly binds with nic making a 100 times more addictive compound) and other additives, I have no doubt about.

But the legislators are quoted speaking specifically about lowering nicotine.

Nobody has mentioned the cocktail of addictive and/or hazardous chemical additives.

Only nicotine which comes from the plant, not the process.

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries
 

listopencil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2017
2,134
8,332
In Partibus Infidelium
I agree...

But I have no evidence or knowledge that they're spraying nic on cigs.

Seems counter productive in a cost/benefit, but what do I know?

Ammonia (which reportedly binds with nic making a 100 times more addictive compound) and other additives, I have no doubt about.

But the legislators are quoted speaking specifically about lowering nicotine.

Nobody has mentioned the cocktail of addictive and/or hazardous chemical additives.

Only nicotine which comes from the plant, not the process.

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries

Yeah, spraying reconstituted tobacco sheets with nic/ammonia/etc. has been part of the process for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ENAUD

mattiem

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mattiem, I see your point. I don't think every smoker wants to quit, certainly, and I absolutely support their right to smoke, in fact I live with one who will have to deal with the repercussions, so I'm not saying they should be abandoned or overlooked.

But... do you think many smokers took the time to evaluate vaping as a harm reduction option and fought for that cause? I don't think that many did. I'm just saying if I had to choose between supporting vaping or smoking, it would be the former. I have made plenty of posts on here about free will, and I'm not trying to shame a group for continuing a behavior I engaged in myself for a long time. I WILL say that if presented with only those two options, I would support vaping, as I believe it to be healthier, and easier to quit over the long term. I personally would like it if someone has been a smoker that they can CONTINUE to smoke exactly what they like, unless/until they are ready to quit, I do think for newer smokers or the curious, reducing nicotine could help. I have ABSOLUTELY no idea how to achieve both objectives, however, and I don't want to see a smoking black market more than any other one, as it usually leads to poorer health outcomes and more crime.

With that said, even given the unfairness of the "two options" which it seems we are headed toward... I have to support the one that I bM of us elieve is overall better for society. Ideally, it wouldn't be a choice, but if I lived in an ideal world.... I can't remember one. My first memory is of my mom crying in the middle of the night, because my dad was possibly bleeding out in the hospital from repairing a lung collapse (I was 3), and she was pretty sure he was going to die. And he smoked himself and did not quit for a very long time after that, and I started myself...

I agree that motivation has to be there.... But I think my dad would have vaped then, if it were around.... It would have been good harm reduction for him, possibly, though maybe not perfect.

I just... other than no intervention at all except for vape education that is correct and accurate and timely, as well as including vape in Smoking Cessation classes (WITH education) to make that happen? I don't really know how cigarettes can be made "safer" or "less addictive" without causing current smokers difficulty.... I really don't. :( I wish I did.

Anna
I think I do understand where you are coming from and I personally have enjoyed reading your posts. I have noted that you are all for free will and that you don't try to make folks believe as you do but where we part ways is I will fight for both smokers and vapers. There is no either/or for me.

I say forget about trying to change cigarettes to make them less than they are to try to force smokers to make the switch.....I say just start telling the truth about the benefits of vaping and I don't think it will be necessary to do anything else.
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
I am sorry to be so blunt but that is one road I refuse to go down. It's like the folks that quit cold turkey. In their mind if they could do it that way we should be able to do it too. We found vaping and it worked for us but I would never tell someone "It worked for me, it should work for you too".

Personally I want to find a way to stick up for both smokers and vapers. There are some die hard smokers that will NEVER give up their smokes and that should be their choice. I fight for vaping so it will be there for those that might start smoking. I truly do believe that those that chose vaping over smoking will not get hooked on vaping the way we got hooked on smoking and will be able to put it behind them without all we had to go through to just quit.

The ANTZ and those that quit by going cold turkey "believe" all of it is harmful and if they can quit or never start in the first place we should be able to do so too.

One "can" do most anything if the desire to do so is there. Forcing the desire never works. In most cases it will just cause most adults to just dig in their heals even harder.

I have been around long enough to remember when we lived with the motto...Live and let live......now it seems to be ....do it my way or you are doing it wrong. :facepalm:

I know that you know I feel the same way. :)

Very well stated. When we take away choice, we screw ourselves. Once choice is taken from one group, it gives the red light to try to go after whomever they wish that is next in line.

My kids still smoke. You can lead a horse to water and all that... I do not want them to be forced to have a 'less nic' cig. That will surely lead them to smoking more and do you think that the powers that be will announce loud enough for All to hear, that this is what they are doing? Or will it be a case of smokers not realizing WHY they feel the need to smoke more? Which in turn means that they are doing more damage to their health.

The Government and the FDA playing God sickens me.
 

listopencil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2017
2,134
8,332
In Partibus Infidelium
Where do they get the nic? From the bits they're making sheets out of?

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries

From the tobacco, I'd imagine. They can extract nicotine from tobacco as it is being processed and then add it to the recon sheets to control nic levels.
 

ENAUD

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
9,810
64,089
Bordertown of ProVariland and REOville
Strait from the horses mouth:


Thanks Bdeck,

I agree that with modern farming a lot can be done to "improve/change" harvest. I'll admit to sometimes wondering if my American Spirit Tobacco cans had humectant added in somehow via GMO, because it was never harsh at all. That said, I'm not sure if the ultimate outcome makes a difference.... The fact remains that tobacco is overall becoming more nicotin-ized, though as you say, it may not be much of enough to make a difference....

That said, I'd love to talk to someone in BT industry to find out what exactly does happen as cigarettes are created.... I'm sure there are trade secrets....

Also, I keep meaning to tell you that I adore Jim Jeffries, he's one of my favorite comedians out there! :) OT I know, but every time I see that quote, it gets me laughing. :)

Sorry that work's so intense at the moment :)

Anna

I agree...

But I have no evidence or knowledge that they're spraying nic on cigs.

Seems counter productive in a cost/benefit, but what do I know?

Ammonia (which reportedly binds with nic making a 100 times more addictive compound) and other additives, I have no doubt about.

But the legislators are quoted speaking specifically about lowering nicotine.

Nobody has mentioned the cocktail of addictive and/or hazardous chemical additives.

Only nicotine which comes from the plant, not the process.

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries

Where do they get the nic? From the bits they're making sheets out of?

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries
 

beckdg

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 1, 2013
11,018
35,706
TN
From the tobacco, I'd imagine. They can extract nicotine from tobacco as it is being processed and then add it to the recon sheets to control nic levels.
Strait from the horses mouth:
Thanks, Duane.

"Never at any point in the processing process is any additional nicotine added."

"The resulting product actually has less nicotine than when the crops were harvested or processed."

:thumb:

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries
 

listopencil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2017
2,134
8,332
In Partibus Infidelium
Thanks, Duane.

"Never at any point in the processing process is any additional nicotine added."

"The resulting product actually has less nicotine than when the crops were harvested or processed."

:thumb:

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries

Sure, and they also never mentioned ammonia once in the entire video even though they've been using it to freebase nicotine for decades. And they also called their chemical stew 'flavorings.' And this video was made by Phillip Morris. Like I implied earlier, believe what you want to believe. I'm sure a big tobacco company would never officially lie to or willfully deceive the American people. Right?
 

ENAUD

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
9,810
64,089
Bordertown of ProVariland and REOville
Sure, and they also never mentioned ammonia once in the entire video even though they've been using it to freebase nicotine for decades. And they also called their chemical stew 'flavorings.' And this video was made by Phillip Morris. Like I implied earlier, believe what you want to believe. I'm sure a big tobacco company would never officially lie to or willfully deceive the American people. Right?
Neither would a public health agency ;)
 

ENAUD

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
9,810
64,089
Bordertown of ProVariland and REOville
Why would you trust either one?
I don't, but watching the film I used a bit of deductive reasoning to decide for myself why would they lie about the nicotine levels, they were just describing matter of factly how they make the product. Of course, i also realize that the cocktail of flavor enhancers and smoothing agents contain chemicals like ammonia, which frees up the nicotine molecules present to make them more readily taken up in their most active state when the product is burned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CMD-Ky

beckdg

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 1, 2013
11,018
35,706
TN
Sure, and they also never mentioned ammonia once in the entire video even though they've been using it to freebase nicotine for decades. And they also called their chemical stew 'flavorings.' And this video was made by Phillip Morris. Like I implied earlier, believe what you want to believe. I'm sure a big tobacco company would never officially lie to or willfully deceive the American people. Right?
There is stronger, better tasting, less tainted tobacco readily available.

Nicotine is fairly expensive.

Nicotine is at best mildly habit forming by itself.

The process outlined above is one to maximize profits.

There's no benefit as a business decision to adding nicotine.

Ammonia makes more addiction.

MAOI's mask symptoms.

Denatured alcohol is a solvent for their cocktail.

There are benefits to the company in these additions... profit.

BT doesn't get much for a pack of smokes.

We just pay a lot.

Guns don't kill people, virgins do! -Jim Jeffries
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread