Coming from a person who smoked for 45 years+, and tried to quit countless times, I can tell you that based on my 45 years, I have never seen more hope than I see right now!
Coming from a person who smoked for 45 years+, and tried to quit countless times, I can tell you that based on my 45 years, I have never seen more hope than I see right now!
However, if you are looking for guarantees, please do me a favor and let me know when you find one!
I can 100% Guarantee that Vaping is Completely Safe*.
* Guarantee Void in California, Tennessee, Virginia and North Carolina.
Good thing then that Mike lives in Virginia!I can 100% Guarantee that Vaping is Completely Safe*.
* Guarantee Void in California, Tennessee and North Carolina.
Good thing then that Mike lives in Virginia!![]()
All we can do is go by the best that science has to offer today.
"Yesterday is gone, tomorrow may never get here, therefor all we have is TODAY".....
Once again, live for today!
"Yesterday is gone, tomorrow may never get here, therefor all we have is TODAY".....
![]()
(I had just noticed that I had three matchy-match mods and tanks sitting next to each other and just had to snap an image of them)![]()
nice job Mike, it's cool to see how the wicks compare...
have you ever seen P. Busardos' version
I wonder how representative that of the way people wick their coils in real life? I mean, we don't wick our coils based on the weight of the wicking material, do we?All samples were exactly 0.11g of fiber, except sample #5 which was so dense it wouldnt have been long enough.
How about the same sort of setup, with an actual coil connected to a DNA, set up to log via eScribe. Pre-saturate the wick with uncolored liquid. Put colored liquid in the reservoir. Fire the coil to some reasonable temperature,say 400F and record how many watts it takes to maintain that temperature. Without additional airflow, the wattage should be inidcative of how fast the wick can supply liquid, I think..?Now keep in mind that this is only HALF the story. With wicks were care about 2 things, capillary action, and flow. This only demonstrated capillary action. I am still pondering a good protocol to test flow.
I wonder how representative that of the way people wick their coils in real life? I mean, we don't wick our coils based on the weight of the wicking material, do we?
How about the same sort of setup, with an actual coil connected to a DNA, set up to log via eScribe. Pre-saturate the wick with uncolored liquid. Put colored liquid in the reservoir. Fire the coil to some reasonable temperature,say 400F and record how many watts it takes to maintain that temperature. Without additional airflow, the wattage should be inidcative of how fast the wick can supply liquid, I think..?
I was thinking the visual part should be covered by "Pre-saturate the wick with uncolored liquid. Put colored liquid in the reservoir."I like it, and it makes perfect sense to me, but I was hoping for something more visual and less technical. Considering some in the audience, the less that is subject to interpretation, the easier my life is.
Thats where the flow testing should shed some light.BTW... One of the things that bugged me about P.Busardo's original experiments, and I said so at the time in the original big Rayon thread was: I'm not convinced the speed at which a dry wick becomes wet is at necessarily representative of how fast a pre-saturated wick transports liquid.
Agreed, I have NEVER weighed my wick, I just cut it to size. For testing reason though,
The cottons where all close enough that I dont think it mattered much, but the liquid captured within the Native Wicks caught my eye, and I cant help but wonder if that would correlate to better "flow".
- I was trying to eliminate as many variables as possible.
- I was consious of the "feel" of a 3mm wick, and they all felt "right".
- I personally dont have a good enough feel for cotton to have known the difference between the 3 in how much I should have used. I.e. should I have used more VCC than KDH? Helluviknow...
- This way nobody can say I jilted the test by favoring one cotton over another by means of technique.
I also "suspect" the depth of green color in each wick at the end of the test might also correlate to "flow", which would put us between the rayon and the Native Wicks.
The cottons where all close enough that I dont think it mattered much, but the liquid captured within the Native Wicks caught my eye, and I cant help but wonder if that would correlate to better "flow".
I was thinking the visual part should be covered by "Pre-saturate the wick with uncolored liquid. Put colored liquid in the reservoir."
I would very interested in fact.....Interesting, thanks for doing that Mike.
That's the cotton that I've used less than anything else. I've got a mod set up now that has given me more dry hits than I've gotten since, well... ever. It's the new DNA mod I told you about Mike and I'm running it in wattage mode (?) with a new atty that has quickly gotten a reputation for being power hungry. I've got it set to 55 watts and am getting a good vape but it drys out much, and I do mean much, faster than any of my mechs. Im an unrepentant over squonker and squounk between every hit. My draws are usually 5 seconds, give or take, and I never get a dry hit on my mechs but towards the end of the draw on this mod, it has gotten rather unpleasant. I'm going to try just changing to Native Wick and seeing if I notice any difference. It will be a very unscientific study but I'll let you know how it goes.