Indeed. And I think that is really all we can base vaping/not vaping on at this point in time. Our own situations, and what that hidden board could potentially mean for us. If I was much older with more risk from smoking? I might just get on with vaping, though I may also try to do it in such a way as to minimise the theoretical risks, based upon where we currently think they are most likely to come from with the information we do have.
I'm lucky not only to be young (statistically, I do indeed have a decade before smoking does any permanent damage), but also to have the kind of genetics I do. A family full of life-long smokers who never suffer from anything worse than a bit of asthma. People in my family either die of old age, or flamboyant recklessness. And sometimes they live to old age despite a lifetime of flamboyant recklessness.
The worst thing I have to worry about in the mid-term future is gum disease.
I am definitely a shades of gray person, as a rule. No doubt smoking is harmful, even for someone with my genetics. My smoker family isn't dropping dead, but I'd like to see them try to run a mile. But I also have a couple friends with 2 smoker/ex-smoker parents who both got or died of smoking-related cancer.
But I do think there is a social stigma-based campaign that exaggerates the harms of smoking, or at least applies them more thickly and indiscriminately than is the reality. It depends on a million different factors, and I remember railing about that even before I was a smoker, when I was doing my homework and realized how twisted around the public anti-smoking campaign really is.
Likewise, I think the FDA fear campaign is wrong in an incredible way. They're wrong in a way that dismisses the potentially huge social and health impact of vaping if it is guided and researched well in the coming decade. What a foolish thing for them to do. What a blatantly irresponsible thing for them to do.
But likewise, I wish I saw more critical discussion in the vaping world itself. I wish I saw fewer people dismissing symptoms on the Health section of this forum. That is equally foolish and irresponsible.
I guess I'm trying to learn how to play the long game. I guess that's sort of ambitious given the brevity of my life. That's something people spend 50 years working on. But you're right - it's not failure, and there's plenty more time for me to figure out my long game.
I'm lucky not only to be young (statistically, I do indeed have a decade before smoking does any permanent damage), but also to have the kind of genetics I do. A family full of life-long smokers who never suffer from anything worse than a bit of asthma. People in my family either die of old age, or flamboyant recklessness. And sometimes they live to old age despite a lifetime of flamboyant recklessness.
I am definitely a shades of gray person, as a rule. No doubt smoking is harmful, even for someone with my genetics. My smoker family isn't dropping dead, but I'd like to see them try to run a mile. But I also have a couple friends with 2 smoker/ex-smoker parents who both got or died of smoking-related cancer.
But I do think there is a social stigma-based campaign that exaggerates the harms of smoking, or at least applies them more thickly and indiscriminately than is the reality. It depends on a million different factors, and I remember railing about that even before I was a smoker, when I was doing my homework and realized how twisted around the public anti-smoking campaign really is.
Likewise, I think the FDA fear campaign is wrong in an incredible way. They're wrong in a way that dismisses the potentially huge social and health impact of vaping if it is guided and researched well in the coming decade. What a foolish thing for them to do. What a blatantly irresponsible thing for them to do.
But likewise, I wish I saw more critical discussion in the vaping world itself. I wish I saw fewer people dismissing symptoms on the Health section of this forum. That is equally foolish and irresponsible.
I guess I'm trying to learn how to play the long game. I guess that's sort of ambitious given the brevity of my life. That's something people spend 50 years working on. But you're right - it's not failure, and there's plenty more time for me to figure out my long game.
Last edited: