Dixie vspor Kennesaw ga. Dave got a few today probably sold out in the next 40mind
I had the same issue. None of my atty's would fire because the cheap non-adjustable 510 connector was too deep. Sent it back asking for a refund.Hi guys, my brother and i picked two hana dna 40s and mine works excellent. My brothers doesn't read the atomizer. I even removed the atomizer, plume veil, that works on mine and let it cool down to room temp before attaching to my brothers and still it reads "check atomizer"
I took a look at the 510 connection on the hana and they look the same. My question is is it possible to adjust the 510 pin in a hana dna 40 so that we can rule that out before sending back for a new one? I just don't want to break it trying to adjust the 510 if that is not recommended. Thanks guys/gals!
I had the same issue. None of my atty's would fire because the cheap 510 connector was too deep. Sent it back asking for a refund.
I totally agree! They said they would replace it but my poor brother has to wait for it to come in all over again. I'm just baffled they don't just put in an adjustable pin, I'm sure it doesn't cost that much to have a putting loaded pin added to the design.Imo for a 250 dollar mod...that should not even be an issue.
(sent from Mars, it's not as red as I imagined.)
I totally agree! They said they would replace it but my poor brother has to wait for it to come in all over again. I'm just baffled they don't just put in an adjustable pin, I'm sure it doesn't cost that much to have a putting loaded pin added to the design.
The reason you need to limit the power setting is that, unless Evolv have implemented a very good control algorithm that can learn to tune itself, the temperature will overshoot. Take a look at this graph:
![]()
I had the same issue. None of my atty's would fire because the cheap non-adjustable 510 connector was too deep. Sent it back asking for a refund.
Hmm interesting!But does this problem actually apply to this problem? If you control the "speed" of the temperature change directly with the watts instead of an "acceleration", you can just set the power to 0 watts and the curve should flatten immediately. If you where to measure the temperature externally you would have a lag until the heat produced reaches the temperature sensor through some kind of medium, then you could get these overshoot problems, but since you directly measure the resistance? Not sure really. Of course you do have a constant loss of heat that you want to compensate, so maybe that introduces this type of hysteresis error again into the system.
I have never implemented this but I guess if you look in a textbook you'll find some kind of self balancing algorithm for these types of problems? I bet these are the type of problems that the CTO of evolv loves to nail perfectly![]()

I'd wait for the Aqua v2 coming out really soonFinally got a window made from 1/8" polycarbonate.
Noticed vaping a Kaiser build, single coil 3x.5mm screw mandrel, 12 wraps 30 gauge Ni200, the power drops then goes over then comes back to setting.
View attachment 383126
View attachment 383127
View attachment 383128
@sedge, Got an Aqua on the way.
Dejay.
That graph is a standard PID Control example and the Green trace is the optimum response curve right out of a "Closed Loop Controller Handbook". It doesn't get any better than the "Green" trace. The "Green" tuning gets to temp the fastest with the minimum overshoot and secondary undershoot.
I am amazed that Evolv has not put out some recommended settings for their board. They have to know exactly what the best configuration is.
I made a post stating that I would love to know what their approach to temperature control is which I am sure they will never tell but I am sure they could give some typical setting without giving away the proprietary design.
I haven't been able to even order one yet "Out of Stock" is the code word. But is we are going to post tuning results i.e. what works and what doesn't we are going to have to state wire ga. and length. The mass of the Ni200 has a lot to do with the operation of the controller. I assume that mass calculation is part of what is done when it thinks the atty has changed or when it asks you if it has changed so it must be important to the control algorithm. Once calculated they then use data from a look up table in conjunction with monitoring the change in current flow (delta resistance).
There is one other factor that I have no idea how they deal with and that is the internal resistance of different attys i.e. I have three ZAPs (Z-atty Pro) and they use a spring loaded positive connector. One reads (on my Fluke Multimeter) 0.1 the second is about 0.2 and one I need to take apart and clean that reads 0.35 to 0.4 ohms. That is a substantial portion of the entire Ni200 coil resistance. "Just one of those things that make ya go Hmmm..."
PS - I don't even remember what I started out to say. The DNA-40 software is pretty darn smart or someone is pulling the wool over our eyes.![]()
There is generally a heat reservoir involved. That would either push the temperature higher even though you'd cut power or, more likely in this case, drop temperature faster than you expect. So the first peak is at the right temperature but it settles far below it. You need the control process to choose exactly that power which maintains the temperature, and that power requirement changes depending on how hot the wick is and whether someone is sucking on the drip-tip.Hmm interesting!But does this problem actually apply to this problem? If you control the "speed" of the temperature change directly with the watts instead of an "acceleration", you can just set the power to 0 watts and the curve should flatten immediately. If you where to measure the temperature externally you would have a lag until the heat produced reaches the temperature sensor through some kind of medium, then you could get these overshoot problems, but since you directly measure the resistance? Not sure really. Of course you do have a constant loss of heat that you want to compensate, so maybe that introduces this type of hysteresis error again into the system.
I have implemented several of these. My customers tend to want to run an 8 litre engine with its unpressurised coolant at 98C. That's maybe a quarter of a megawatt input and two degrees margin of error. Get it wrong and they have to abort the 3000-hour test and get out the mop and buckets. I run that control loop at the same speed as Evolv -- 10 Hz, which makes me think they are running too slow to have very tight control. Brandon said they control to within 10 degrees and while most of that will be measurement inaccuracy, a good part will be control-loop lag. They may have an adaptive algorithm in there -- methods do exist to self-tune a control loop -- but if the control was tight the coefficients would vary depending on how hard the vaper was sucking. There's a limit to how tight they can make it.I have never implemented this but I guess if you look in a textbook you'll find some kind of self balancing algorithm for these types of problems? I bet these are the type of problems that the CTO of evolv loves to nail perfectly![]()
View attachment 383133
Guess who's having 2 reasons to vape today haha. Can't wait to build this sucker
Going to get one at Dixie or did Big Bang get some?
You will not be disappointed! I got mine this morning. I can't wait to get home and build with the nickel wire.
Maybe internal resistance is the reason for the +/- 10 degrees thing? Don't catch me lying...lol
Bass,
You may be correct about the +/- 10 degrees. But my guess is that holding within 10 degrees is a pretty good trick even if the atty was a perfect zero ohms.
If you think about it the DNA - 40 is like controlling your house temperature with a digital thermostat that has no temperature sensor. Now in my book that rates right up there with... well I can't think of anything but it is truly a marvel.
PS - If I can't get my hands on a DNA 40 Vapor Flask pretty soon you guy are going to drive me nutz (OK... more nutz) with envy.
My customers tend to want to run an 8 litre engine with its unpressurised coolant at 98C. That's maybe a quarter of a megawatt input and two degrees margin of error. Get it wrong and they have to abort the 3000-hour test and get out the mop and buckets. I run that control loop at the same speed as Evolv -- 10 Hz, which makes me think they are running too slow to have very tight control.
It is a marvel and I love it!!!
I am setting temp to protect the wicking too. Been vaping at 400 degrees (burn point of cotton is 410 and I love cotton) set for 30 watts but I have never seen it climb above 6 to 7 watts before the coil is at 400. Man, the battery life that way is insane. I tried setting temp to 525 at 22 watts just to see it hold watts while the temp rises. For me personally the vape was too hot and sticky. I am certain there are people that like it that way, I am not one though.
Even at those settings the vapor production is great.