PDIB's Making MODs!

[pdib]

That test mule body has been tested now hasn't it

I like the way it looks / works currently but I certainly don't represent the masses.

I really like symmetry too. Current OliveR symmetric squonk hole would be my pick if only aesthetics were being considered.

I guess I'd have to squonk a new one to see if the feel outweighs form.

If you need my address again to send me one just let know

Yeah, I too prefer the symmetry and simplicity of the original. Looking at the orig., one doesn't ask, "why is it that shape". It blends. That's why I went with it. This one is undoubtedly stronger, tho; and, like I said, when there's function for the form to follow, I can justify it.

 

[timk]

New squonk hole looks fine, but I prefer the original as far as looks go. That one obviously looks stronger so I'm all for that. Aesthetically though, I like the original. I am curious what a half circle cutout for the squonk hole would look like. Not sure of possible implications that would result; just curious.

 

[pdib]

that's one of the things I tried back when. didn't like it; primarily because it's actually quite constricted.

 

[Vapeaholic]

this week is actually all about squonk holes. This run, I've been re-examining many of the processes in fabrication. I guess I've gotten comfortable enough with the process that I have the headspace for a little questioning and some small improvements in how I do things. Also, apparently, it's time to look at squonk holes. (i've no control over this stuff, it just happens) So, way back when, when initially designing this fling-flangin' mod, I tried a number of shapes for squonk holes. I settled on the simple one I've been doing because it was the most appealing to me. For me, form is wed with function, and any digression from that (unnecessary fanciness) is . . . . . .. "too many notes". However, I now have an excuse. In the interest of strengthening the squonk hole, I've spent a little time revisiting one of my earlier ideas (now justified by functional necessity). The hole is set ~ 1mm higher, the cut-away at bottom is 12mm deep instead of 15 (the top is now 16mm deep for "effect", and to keep the vertical centerpoint set back as far as possible), and the radius of the bottom corner is ~1/2" vs 1/4. So, there's less unsupported lip, thicker, and a fatter radius to support it.

Functionally, it's about the same: plenty of squeeze room on that bottle. There would be some chance that one would actually make contact with the wood when doing a deep (low fluids) squonk; however, I don't think it would impede "full throw".

So, the question is: how does it appeal, aesthetically?

I had thought in terms of getting some feedback, and then either changing to this style or not. However, as I was wrapping up the mock-up, I realized I can just offer it as an option.

(pic heavy for accuracy in representation)

Reminds me of the face shield on a racing helmet. I like it.
Call it the Turbo Dibi.

 

[pdib]

here's a pic of how far one could compress one's . . . . . . .. juice squirter. My finger is gently bottomed out in the turbo deluxe squonk gap, and you can see it's well past the halfway point.

 

[pdib]

Reminds me of the face shield on a racing helmet. I like it.
Call it the Turbo Dibi.

yes, that is to maximize the juice bottle's field of peripheral vision, all the while protecting it's chinnie-chin-chin.

 

[Vapeaholic]

yes, that is to maximize the juice bottle's field of peripheral vision, all the while protecting it's chinnie-chin-chin.

Makes perfect sense to me. Bottles don't like blind spots

 

[Treebeard]

I like the understated elegant appearance of the current model and I'll go on record as saying that I flat out don't like the helmeted look of the experimental one.

 

[MFarley]

What about an oval shape?
Narrower at top and bottom.
A little more strength and still symmetrical.

 

[pdib]

not seein' it . . . . . trying to translate an oval onto a cylinder . . . .. but it just makes my brain hurt a little.

 

[Kataphraktos]

You forgot to hate on kanthal while you were on your rant. Please try again with negative kanthal statements, no back up documents allowed either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, yes! Along with the legally-mandated "Rayon is poisonous evil!" disclaimer.

 

[unsure]

Options are great for customers but usually a PITA for the builders.

 

[Kn0ttYFive]

Hi all,
Just hanging around, looking at the beautiful DIBI (s).
Please don't beat me up, plus I brought weapons just in case! (heard you guys are rowdy)

 

[cecsystems]

Excellent question! ...

Next question please!

Sweet!!! This looks like the perfect place for TBD ? Yes? Love you man!

 

[cecsystems]

Please don't knock Rayon until you've tried it... IMHO it rocks!!!

 

[Rossum]

this week is actually all about squonk holes. [...] So, the question is: how does it appeal, aesthetically?

Since you're soliciting opinions, mine is: I'm not crazy about it, but it wouldn't keep me from buying another one if that's the way you decided to make 'em from now on.

Reminds me of the face shield on a racing helmet. I like it.

I knew it looked somehow familiar but I couldn't place it until you said that.

Options are great for customers but usually a PITA for the builders.

The leave it to the builder to decide. If I were him, anyone who'd admitted in public that they'd broken their dibi's chin would get the new style squonk hole if/when they order a second one -- whether they want it or not.

 

[pdib]

It's pretty much the same amount of work. Already have a list of options to discuss, determine. What the heck.


worst thing that could happen is somebody gets the wrong hole.

which would be funny . . . .. beeeeee-cause . . .. . . then they'd be sticking their finger in the wrong hole all the time.

 

[pdib]

Hi all,
Just hanging around, looking at the beautiful DIBI (s).
Please don't beat me up, plus I brought weapons just in case! (heard you guys are rowdy)

Hi, Waterfront.

 

[MFarley]

The 2nd one probably wouldn't work with the arches at top and bottom. But the 1st with the side view might.

 

[e30ernest]

This looks viable.

I'm with the camp that prefers the aesthetic look of a symmetrical squonk hole. However, I understand the benefits of strengthening the lower lip. I think Mark's photo above can be a good compromise?