I tested my sweetener testers today. I mixed 30mls of a simple lemonade - 3% INW Lemon, 1% INW Lemon Mix. I divided that up into three 10ml portions and added .5% CAP Super Sweet to one, .5% Sugar Daddy to another, and 1% FLV Sweetness to the third. I let them sit for a couple of days.
Results - IMO, Sugar Daddy does have a muting effect on the juice. The one with CAP SS and the one with FLV Sweetness were more vibrant. I liked the CAP SS best. FLV Sweetness is a 10% sucralose solution and tastes clean. CAP SS is Sucralose 10%, Citric Acid, Sodium Benzoate, Potassium Sorbate, and Water. Those additives seem to help the flavors along a bit. Wayne says, "I've been leaning more towards FLV Sweetness as my sweetener, and adding in a touch of CA if I want to emulate CAP SS without the filler. But for some reason, to me at least, CAP SS's enhancement properties are still better. And yes, sucralose in vaping is the only "true" sweetener (save for erythritol etc.), anything else really just sweetens in the aroma, which isn't sweetness at all."
I guess I feel the same way. It was a great disappointment to me to find the Sugar Daddy has a muting effect. I do have to say that I am still vaping and enjoying e-liquid that contains Sugar Daddy. It may be that the Sherbet Lemons is more highly flavored so the muting effect is less intense.
I suppose you all have to try it for yourself as some say they get no muting with Sugar Daddy but since I do, I will probably just use my CAP SS from now on. Sugar Daddy does work but with the muting, it won't be what I reach for when I need a sweetener.