Pipeous, you know I consider you a friend. And I'm sorry if the earlier post offended you.
But let's be clear about something: a world without restrictions would be a very,
very dangerous place. Freedom should absolutely have limits. Absolute freedom = anarchy.
More specifically to this thread...consumers should
not ever have the freedom to buy anything under the sun just because they feel like it - especially when it comes to nicotine. Nicotine is wonderful, enjoyable stuff -
at safe levels. At unsafe levels, it's deadly.
Everyone who vapes has a fundamental responsibility to be knowledgeable
and safe about their vaping. Doubtless there are some completely insane people out there who would love to buy
100% pure nicotine, if they could only find a seller - especially if the price was good. Laws & reasonable restrictions on freedom exist - to protect people from themselves. Because a lot of people frankly
need that. Badly.
That's why we have laws requiring you to wear a seatbelt in a car. That's why we have warning labels on all kinds of things. That's why we have drinking laws, & age-limit laws, & prescriptions & a hundred other examples I needn't rattle off. A lawless society with no restrictions on anything would be very free - and
very dangerous. You see what we're saying?
---
We have said this many times before & we'll say it again: people are free to make their own choices, & do what they feel is right. But 100mg strength nic liquid is factually
unsafe. It's irresponsible, totally unnecessary
(not one person here needs it), inconsiderate, & it should not be available for consumers to purchase. For trained, certified chemists and the like? Yes. For consumers, no.
I make no apologies for sharing that view with others, especially when concern for their mortal safety
(& to a lesser extent, concern for the entire community's continued access to safe levels of nic) is the motivation in doing so.
Unfortunately, dangerous nic levels like 100mg
are presently available for consumers to purchase. Which is why we will continue to recommend smart, sensible avoidance of such when the issue is raised in the forum. Eventually, regulation will come - it's going to happen. HC will be looking for any excuse it can find in order to relent as little as possible, particularly on the nicotine front. Let's not give them one.
---
And as for Box Elder...we never said we would call the authorities on them. We simply said we had half a mind towards doing so. Their product
is fraudulently labelled in a manner that could expose people to serious harm. How on earth are people supposed to assume that Levonic = nicotine? Google the following:
Levonic nicotine
You get
9 results. Most of them from
this thread.
So if someone stumbled across Box Elder's site, they'd have no idea there was nicotine in there. Or that it
wasn't Levonic the antibiotic for sale. A random customer looking for the antibiotic would be quite surprised to find they'd received a bottle of PG with nic instead. Need more? Do a search for nicotine on that site: you'll get
no results. They're hiding the nicotine connection intentionally.
Granted, they don't appear to sell any other drugs etc...their primary business seems to be bulk quantities of PG & VG etc. But still - someone could purchase supplies from them without realizing the nicotine connection. At best, Box Elder is not being particularly aboveboard, or putting customer safety first.
We have no desire to give anyone unnecessary grief. But if a company is potentially putting people in danger, should people just sit by & say
"oh well, not my problem..." - ???
---
In conclusion, I know things get heated in a debate sometimes folks. When it comes to the lives of fellow vapers, I take a very hard view. But disagreement on an
issue should not be seen as an invitation to attack the
person who is posting differing opinions from your own. Please bear that in mind.
Stay safe, happy vaping...& all the best.