guys, how does one become properly trained in mechs?
Look on YouTube. There are a lot of good videos there. Search " mech mods for beginners". It's not as hard as people make it out to be. The most important thing is to follow the safety rules. Knowing your equipment, Ohms Law and battery safety are a must with no compromise. Good quality batteries are a must. For 18650 batteries I use Samsung 25R. For 21700 batteries I use Samsung 30T. You need to know how to build your own coils and you have to have an ohms meter. I prefer my mech mods over my regulated mods. Everything does have it's place.bomb, i fear you have little respect for the second amendment, without which the rest of our rights will fall.
guys, how does one become properly trained in mechs?
i don't mean to be semi competent, like cops are with guns, i mean competent.
My understanding is that after the deaths involved inold mechs blowing up and killing their users, popularity has dropped. It is still not zero. Mech mods are seeming to take on some of the same appeal as fire arms where their users wave them around and attempt to use them as indicators of their exactitude and confidence in their ability to not make dangerous mistakes.
Also like firearms they occasionally blow off body parts doing so, and the general public has a poor opinion of them doing their waving in the vicinity of others which increases by location as personal confines get closer and the possibility of said waver hurting bystanders as well as themselves increases.
accidental mech incidents do not happen to trained people.
yeah, they happen to careless or ignorant n such, but not to properly trained people.
safe handling applies to more than guns.
bomb, i fear you have little respect for the second amendment, without which the rest of our rights will fall.
guys, how does one become properly trained in mechs?
i don't mean to be semi competent, like cops are with guns, i mean competent.
That depends to some degree on the gun in question. I again refer to history of the Remington 700. It most certainly did. Well over a hundred accidental deaths of trained users for a single model of device, though over a very long period. Not the fault of the users or the bullets though. That was all greedy manufacturers.That is a HORRIBLE analogy. Guns are actually a lot safer than mech mod. There is no possible way a user could accidentally load a bullet into a gun that would cause the whole gun to blow up in the user's face. Not so with a mech.
My advice has generally been “I don’t do it” which isn’t advice so much as merely reporting. I was a user of mechs for a while without the knowledge I learned on this forum and I view my own previous behavior as dangerous in light of my current knowledge. My only advice is that there is a lot of knowledge that is necessary to learn first, and the simplest way to not have to do that is to not use them. Most people want to find out if ecigs are even useful to them first, and they can do that without needing to use a mech these days so why go through the headache? This applies to modern rechargeable batteries as well, but they’re everywhere now. Phones, headphones, almost anything wireless electronic and portable. In those instances the headaches are incurred by the engineers designing the equipment. When you build a coil on a mech though you effectively become the design engineer. With VV devices there is at least an engineer in the middle of the process.OK...In my opinion the number one thing to educate yourself about is the hard short and what causes it....all the deaths (3) that have been caused have almost certainly been caused by a hard short in a non ventilated mech tube...
Is it right to caution about use.....yes absolutely. Is it right to be so anti mech that your advice is 'don't do it' .....No.
We should educate not abolish....the vast majority of people that come in here, asking for mech advice, are doing so because they have one and they want to use it safely. I for one would rather give the correct advice on safe usage than start a rant about the issue with dubious analogies...Stay safe.
That depends to some degree on the gun in question. I again refer to history of the Remington 700. It most certainly did. Well over a hundred accidental deaths of trained users for a single model of device, though over a very long period. Not the fault of the users or the bullets though. That was all greedy manufacturers.
I’m not sure if I was the one who first brought up firearms or not. It’s possible I suppose. It’s a hot button issue even for US politics.
I disagree on the safety comparison myself. I suspect mech mods are a lot safer than guns. They accidentally kill a lot fewer people for one, ingnoring entirely intentional deaths which I don’t think count in this instance. There are a lot more guns than mech mods though. I assume the per item death rate for mods is lower than guns though there is no data I know of. Are you saying that as a device both more dangerous than guns and not covered directly by constitutional protections that you feel they should be banned?
The Remington 700 wasn’t the only one with problems. I understand Taurus handguns had some issues recently as well. I’m not familiar with the particulars though. I don’t really follow it. I’m not a gun owner. I consider them unsafe for me to have. Just me. The Remington 700 issue was widely publicized, at least on the blue side of our great national political divide. There are whole video documentaries about it, and a major lawsuit, which I understand was settled out of court in a way a lot of people were not happy with.I didn't know about these Remington 700 issues. I'll have to look into that. The only Remington I have personal experience with is the 1100 which is a shotgun not a bolt action rifle like the 700. I do own several other guns as well.
I agree on that one. Nothing at all is even 100% safe, let alone one million percent. Current Estimates of e-cigarettes put them as somewhere around 95% safer than cigarettes. I only think things should be banned if the disadvantage of the ban outweighs the disadvantage of the thing it is banning. Cigarettes are so much more dangerous than e-cigarettes that banning any e-cigarette mech or not constitutes a greater disadvantage than not banning. And cigarettes themselves have already passed that test to begin with. They cannot be banned, though there are still people who think they should be. It riles me a bit that these same people then go after e-cigarettes when the whole point is that they are at the very least a step towards removing the danger they are so worked up about in the first place. Attempting to ban e-cigarettes in order to make more people die so you can get your preferred political way is IMHO both dangerous and hypocritical.Most gun accidents are caused by someone believing the gun is empty when it isn't or kids playing with one that they shouldn't be. Mech accidents can happen even when someone is trying to be safe with them. They can even occur due to the batteries simply getting old and no longer able to support a specific build.
No I am not saying mechs should be banned. I am not the sort to cry "BAN IT" over every little thing that isn't 1000000% safe. I understand that just getting out the bed or taking a shower has inherent risks. In fact the only time we aren't at risk is after we are dead.
Or making them make them. That has been an issue historically.Guns and mechs are as safe or dangerous as the humans using them make them.
That you didn’t hear about it at all is interesting. The concept that someone with no interest in gun ownership is getting more information, or at least different information than someone who does implies a disconnect.