The Darwin From Evolv!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Katdarling

I'm still here on ECF... sort of. ;)
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 25, 2011
32,585
167,802
Utopia
We, as vapers, are in an interesting, sandwiched position between smokers and non-smokers. We are carving out the path, and have no real reference points but our own journeys. Pioneers... We are pioneers! FWIW, we have each other, which is prolly why ECF is so important to so many of us. We have a place to share our turbulence, our trials and tribulations, but also our TRIUMPHS in this, our new world.

From what I read here, most of us are going thru the same thing in terms of the world around us. I am grateful to all of you, and always excited to hear what your life brings and how you deal with it.

vape happily. (with a D'win in each hand!)
 

Rob0506

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 1, 2011
375
339
Renton, WA
From a legal perspective it makes NO sense to lump vaping with smoking.
There is no smoke. The risks to self and others don't even compare.
It is not smoking. There is no smoke, no tar, no ash, no butts, no carbon monoxide, no open flames, etc.

We don't want it linked to smoking any more than it already is.
Why? Health insurance, future litigation, and so much more!
I agree with you as an insider looking at it, but for an outsider it looks the same.
All I am saying is that we need to educate the general public about it, the more they know the more they will support this as a healthier alternative. We will have to fight the zealots, but we must resist the urge to become zealots in our own right. To me this means making the most of teaching moments and picking our battles carefully. We need to understand how our stance will appear to the general public. To them, asking for a separate rule for ecigs would be like asking for a separate rule for cigars and pipes. We know that's not a fair comparison, but they won't.
 

Credo

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 28, 2011
1,976
930
MS
I agree with you as an insider looking at it, but for an outsider it looks the same.
All I am saying is that we need to educate the general public about it, the more they know the more they will support this as a healthier alternative. We will have to fight the zealots, but we must resist the urge to become zealots in our own right. To me this means making the most of teaching moments and picking our battles carefully. We need to understand how our stance will appear to the general public. To them, asking for a separate rule for ecigs would be like asking for a separate rule for cigars and pipes. We know that's not a fair comparison, but they won't.

But enforceable laws need to be based on science and fact. Not 'public opinion'.

So I agree about educating folks.

The attorneys making these rules at the DOT should know better however. A device that makes water vapor is NOT smoking. If it needs to be banned for some legit reason, that's all fine and dandy, but it's not smoking. If this is challenged in a court (and at some point it probably will be if they make it a DOT rule) and a court upholds this as 'smoking' then it's just the beginning of what courts can 'redefine' at will! All sorts of things can be 'lumped' together as blanket laws/rules then!
 

Katdarling

I'm still here on ECF... sort of. ;)
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 25, 2011
32,585
167,802
Utopia
I agree with you as an insider looking at it, but for an outsider it looks the same.
All I am saying is that we need to educate the general public about it, the more they know the more they will support this as a healthier alternative. We will have to fight the zealots, but we must resist the urge to become zealots in our own right. To me this means making the most of teaching moments and picking our battles carefully. We need to understand how our stance will appear to the general public. To them, asking for a separate rule for ecigs would be like asking for a separate rule for cigars and pipes. We know that's not a fair comparison, but they won't.


+100 Rob. Well said. Yes, yes, yes.
 

Rob0506

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 1, 2011
375
339
Renton, WA
All the smokers I know seem to be real interested in the Darwin. I've never got any real grief from anyone so far. Kind of seems ridiculous for someone puffing away on a stinky old cancer at nearly $9.00 a pack to talk smack about a PV, but with 6 billion people in the world I guess there are going to be quite a few gloopy ones.
 

Rob0506

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 1, 2011
375
339
Renton, WA
But enforceable laws need to be based on science and fact. Not 'public opinion'.

So I agree about educating folks.

The attorneys making these rules at the DOT should know better however. A device that makes water vapor is NOT smoking. If it needs to be banned for some legit reason, that's all fine and dandy, but it's not smoking. If this is challenged in a court (and at some point it probably will be if they make it a DOT rule) and a court upholds this as 'smoking' then it's just the beginning of what courts can 'redefine' at will! All sorts of things can be 'lumped' together as blanket laws/rules then!
I agree with that, but unfortunately laws are made (ultimately, at least) by politicians, so I think we need to think of it as a political fight. We are also lacking in hard scientific data to reinforce what we all believe to be true, that this is a healthier alternative to smoking that causes no significant risk to those around us.

If for no other reason, that latter point is why they will want to lump us with smokers. They will be concerned about "second hand vapor" and all that cal. I don't actually know myself how legitimate that concern is (certainly less than smoking since there is no tar or carcinogens and the vapor dissipates faster).

The pendulum has swung and we are on the wrong end of it with regards to public opinion on smoking, and those lawmakers are certainly paying attention to public opinion. They would certainly cave to it even if they knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that there was no health concerns to those around us. What we really need to focus on, in my view, is getting public opinion on our side. That's how we will ultimately win.


And, I love my Darwin that I bought from Drew at Nhaler.com! LOL
 

Credo

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 28, 2011
1,976
930
MS
I agree with that, but unfortunately laws are made (ultimately, at least) by politicians, so I think we need to think of it as a political fight. We are also lacking in hard scientific data to reinforce what we all believe to be true, that this is a healthier alternative to smoking that causes no significant risk to those around us.

Ah, but we are NOT lacking hard evidence to support the notion that drinking alcohol can cause problems on an airplane. The DOT isn't banning that!

They even want to ban the PV on 'chartered' flights. That's a bit extreme I think. If I want to book a plane for my private party, I'm told the owner of the aircraft, the pilot, and me...all have NO SAY on allowing 'smoking' of any form...including vaping.

What's next? The coffee maker?

Brushing against someone wearing a nic patch is far more risky than boarding an aircraft that was chartered hours ago and had a few vaping partiers on board.

We know what water vapor does to people.
We know what nicotine does to people.
We know what food grade flavorings does to people.

So, unless the PV has something unconventional inside it, we know it's just water vapor...and possibly very trace amounts of nicotine...period. The bug spray used in the airport has more 'nicotine' in it. The potatoes you eat mid-flight have more nicotine in it. So...to make sure nothing 'unconventional' gets into the eCig...just let the airlines sell disposable e-cigs...then it's known exactly what is in them! That's what they do with alcoholic beverages....buy it from us here on the plane, follow our rules in the process, and you can consume it :)
 

hifistud

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 25, 2009
701
170
70
Sunderland, UK
What is your show?? Also 1 quick question, is the kick something that someone could add in their device that does not know how to mod??
vapourtrails.tv | ...... putting u back into vapor ...... - I do the Haze hour. Yes, the Kick simply slides in on top of an 18500 battery if your 18650 mod isn't long enough or telescopic enough to use an 18650 with it - it takes no prior knowledge at all - it is truly a "mod" for the masses and is, in my view, a game changer... More on Thursday - but there;s a quick glimpse of the Kick in this trailer (and Brandon, as it happens)...

 

CountryCarol

Moved On
Jul 20, 2011
157
37
Tennessee
vapourtrails.tv | ...... putting u back into vapor ...... - I do the Haze hour. Yes, the Kick simply slides in on top of an 18500 battery if your 18650 mod isn't long enough or telescopic enough to use an 18650 with it - it takes no prior knowledge at all - it is truly a "mod" for the masses and is, in my view, a game changer... More on Thursday - but there;s a quick glimpse of the Kick in this trailer (and Brandon, as it happens)...

Thank you!! Does the site have the times for the show?

My favorite can not miss show comes on thursdays at elixir so this is going to be a hard call. I have been begging to hear more about this kick though so I may very likely be there for the show.
 

Mister

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 3, 2009
523
27
Nanaimo BC Canada
We will have to fight the zealots, but we must resist the urge to become zealots in our own right. To me this means making the most of teaching moments and picking our battles carefully. We need to understand how our stance will appear to the general public.
Well said!

At the individual contact level I believe we are best to avoid battles altogether. I vape in smoking areas but don't make a show of it. If a smoker becomes curious they'll ask, and that's the right time to gently engage them. Similarly with non-smokers - wait until they want to know what it is, then they're in a receptive mood.

I'm currently on a business trip with a Darwin for the first time travelling. After a couple of days some people at the office had seen me vaping outside, asked about it, invited me to go ahead and vape in their offices, and I'm now welcome to vape at group meetings. This spectacular result hadn't happened to me on trips before and I think the Darwin is partly the reason. It may be that because it looks so unlike a cigarette that people are generally in a more interested and less pre-judgemental state of mind when they get curious enough to ask about it.
 

Panky

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 12, 2011
2,589
2,836
Miami
thanks dude.. had a darwin when i first started vaping but didnt know anything about the whole wattage thing, now ive learned a few things and want to get another one.. Give it another shot..

I am glad that you are coming back to the Darwin. I have seen you around and it seems that you have experience with many mods so I am sure that you will pleased with the Darwin this time around ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread