OMG that video is hillarious!! (There's a little bit after the credits, too.)
Which contest was that from??
Which contest was that from??
Last edited:
The war against electronic cigarettes
- Thread starter Petrodus
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
-
- Tags
- revolution
- Status
Anyone speaking out for e-cigarettes to millions of listeners is better than no one speaking out. If he's getting the message out to millions of smokers, who cares how "reputable" he is to others - he's reputable to his millions of listeners and that's all that matters!
Exactly. And even if they aren't smokers, they will probably know smokers and (hopefully) pass on the message.
There is just no negative to having any celebrity with such a wide audience supporting and talking about e-cigarettes.
Found the humorous video while surfing...
First I've heard of E-cig video contests. Guess I'm not up-to-speed yet.
It's not the Nicotine that kills... It's the Smoke that Kills
video uploaded Jan 2010
“The migration of those from smoke to smokeless and
other types of therapies... If they want to obtain their
nicotine it's OK...”
video uploaded Jan 2010
“The migration of those from smoke to smokeless and
other types of therapies... If they want to obtain their
nicotine it's OK...”
Just noticed a post by yvilla on the Law and the E-Cigarette forum.
So not to start a new thread... here is the link
URGENT - NYS Outright Sales Ban On the AGENDA Again
So not to start a new thread... here is the link
URGENT - NYS Outright Sales Ban On the AGENDA Again
Until someone has proven e-cigs are unsafe the FDA and lawmakers should back off. Really, aren't the benefits of quiting smoking cigarettes self evidence and well documented. If using e-cigs gets people to quite smoking with higher efficacy than other methods(which it does), than the proof of their benefit is obvious. If nothing else, there is a harm reduction principle at work here that makes the products worth allowing.
In the absence of proof that e-cigs are causing people harm the logic to ban them is flawed.
Should the government be taking the role of banning any product, technology or social movement until "they" have determined it is "safe" .......This philosophy does not add up to me.
In the absence of proof that e-cigs are causing people harm the logic to ban them is flawed.
Should the government be taking the role of banning any product, technology or social movement until "they" have determined it is "safe" .......This philosophy does not add up to me.
Truth, Logic, Reason, Health, and Science mean little
to zealots opposing E-cigarettes
Suggested listening
An hour with Dr. Michael Siegel: Click Here
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
