I agree somewhat with what keyzygirl says in terms of coming across as polite. I also agree that any owner of property has a right to include or exclude any person or practice from that property at his/her sole discretion on any basis whatsoever, even if that basis is stupid.
Agreed on both counts. Its no different than before statewide smoking bans went into effect - some places allowed smoking and some did not, and this was up to the owners of these establishments. Just like they had a right to allow (or not allow) smoking, they have a right to allow or not allow vaping. If one doesn't like the policy, they can choose to go elsewhere.
Also, I can see the point of the owners in restaurant in question in the OP. E-cigs are still relatively new; someone might see that and decide to light up a regular cig, or other customers may complain about someone vaping - the restaurant may simply be attempting to head off any such issues by disallowing it outright. Its their establishment so it is their right. Just like other people have a right to patronize or not patronize the place.
I generally don't vape in public places where smoking is disallowed (although I vape to my heart's content in non-smoking hotel rooms) simply because I generally don't want to deal with any potential hassle and also because (as when I smoked) I can comfortably go without for a while with no real issue. I have yet to feel a need to start vaping anywhere and everywhere just because its not an analog. I never felt a strong urge to smoke while grocery shopping, so I have yet to have the urge to vape while doing so.
And if we all follow this direction, then vaping will never be understood, accepted or allowed anywhere.
Personally, the truth is, I just really don't care. My life is busy enough and I don't have the time, inclination or energy to educate the masses. If someone sees me vaping and asks me about it, I'll gladly explain it to them. Other than that, all I care about is that my e-cig has helped me to quit smoking analogs - I don't really care if public places with smoking bans ever choose to allow them or not. Not all of us want to be activists - or see this as an issue to get all worked up about.
That is untrue. They cannot exclude you for "any basis whatsoever". There has to be a "reasonable" reason.
As long the reason is not illegal - sure they can - and they should have that right. Look at those clubs with doormen where some people are let in and some aren't. Some could argue that a dress code is unreasonable - don't like it, conform or go elsewhere.
Never been there. But here is a suggestion. Next time, go into this restruant, order your food, when it arrives, ask the same question. If the answer is the same, leave then, right after they brought the food to the table.
Wow...real mature.