I think that much of the fallacy of this argument is that regulations are meant to keep consumers safe. They are not. They are meant to limit the freedoms of markets and consumers. They limit competition. Rarely do bans and regulations make anyone safer. They only take freedoms from the consumer and often cost them more money.
Let the juice manufacturers and sellers decide what to put on their bottles. Of couse, the consumer needs to know the nic level, ingredients and possible allergic reactions. Beyond that, government should have no say. Let the consumer make the choice in what they find distasteful and then let them make their choice accordingly.
Yes, but, instead of regulations, why not have standards? Manufacturing quality standards, purity standards, nic % standards, ingredient standards.....
Have these things and if manufacturers are found lacking in the standards, then you would know which companies to avoid!