^^^This 100%!!!^^^I am not sure that I would, but I see it as choosing someone whose lifestyle, values and beliefs are in line with your own, a compatibility issue. Honestly, I would not date someone who was an atheist, drinker, gambler or a drug user because my beliefs, values and lifestyle would differ greatly from theirs. As a non-smoker now I am not sure I would want to be around it again on an interpersonal level. I have plenty of family and friends that still smoke but they do not live with me, to me it is bad enough going home reeking of cigarette smoke after I have been around them, I can't imagine living with a smoker now.
Not sure what you are saying tbh. You call someone prejudiced, to invoke a response !? To what end ? And what does " questioning your positions, constantly " , have to do with calling someone prejudiced ? I'm a little confused, but whatever, do your thing i suppose.My replies were very intentional and yes, I wanted to invoke a response. It seems to have worked.
I need to question my positions, constantly. The moment that I become inflexible, my mind has closed to options and possibilities that I may have never considered. I become a prejudicial "me-too'er". I'm committed to being a stand against that in my life.
It seems pretty clear to me. Op said " I don't see myself dating someone who smokes cigs unless they are willing to switch to vaping. I really can't stand the smell of smoke anymore ". Didn't call anyone disgusting, didn't make any judgement of any kind really. He just expressed a preference not to be in a relationship with a smoker.You're right, the OP didn't clarify either way.
As for the ANTZville part, " anyone that does it is disgusting." is, as I said, a step down that path. People are, of course, welcome to their opinions. Thinking smokers are disgusting, and verbalizing that is where the whole anti-smoking movement started though. People believe something, then start thinking everyone else should agree, whether they like it or not.
Some people think this is okay: Smoking is so bad for you that you should choose to quit, and if you don't choose to quit, we will do everything in our power to force you to choose to quit.
Anti Nicotine & Tobacco ZealotWhat is this "ANTZ" you all keep mentioning? Seriously I've heard this in a few other threads as well. What is it? Slang for something?
Anti Nicotine & Tobacco Zealot
I don't want to beat the horse to death. I see where my position could be, and has been, taken out of context. The point I was trying to make to the OP is that exclusion based on one characteristic is discriminatory and prejudicial. It would be like me saying I won't talk to anyone from Staten Island unless they move to Seattle where I live, 'cause I think it's better here.Not sure what you are saying tbh. You call someone prejudiced, to invoke a response !? To what end ? And what does " questioning your positions, constantly " , have to do with calling someone prejudiced ? I'm a little confused, but whatever, do your thing i suppose.
I'm sure some people think so, but keep in mind that some people also think that vaping is disgusting, and others think that eating meat is disgusting. So it seems to me that what constitutes "disgusting" is a rather personal and subjective thing.Yeah, smoking is disgusting
Yeah it gives it a little context i suppose, but we will have to agree to disagree. If i chose not to date someone, anyone really, because they do something that i find annoying, or makes me uncomfortable, i don't see it as being prejudiced. I just see it as a choice i am making. Not talking to someone and not dating them .... clearly not the same thing.I don't want to beat the horse to death. I see where my position could be, and has been, taken out of context. The point I was trying to make to the OP is that exclusion based on one characteristic is discriminatory and prejudicial. It would be like me saying I won't talk to anyone from Staten Island unless they move to Seattle where I live, 'cause I think it's better here.Does that help add a little context?
Thank you! Well, that doesn't sound too cool now does it?![]()
From you, I can take having a difference of opinion and leaving it at that.Yeah it gives it a little context i suppose, but we will have to agree to disagree. If i chose not to date someone, anyone really, because they do something that i find annoying, or makes me uncomfortable, i don't see it as being prejudiced. I just see it as a choice i am making. Not talking to someone and not dating them .... clearly not the same thing.
I've been to worse places than around here. You have to wait until the first time it snows around here. You will be absolutely gobsmacked as a NY'er as to how we react to it. 2" on the ground and it's Snow-pocalypse!As for the move from S.I to Seattle, i have made it already ! Been in Seattle for a couple of months now. Jury is still out whether " it's better here "![]()
It's been a tense few days here on ECF, since the " Harvard Study "From you, I can take having a difference of opinion and leaving it at that.
I've been to worse places than around here. You have to wait until the first time it snows around here. You will be absolutely gobsmacked as a NY'er as to how we react to it. 2" on the ground and it's Snow-pocalypse!I'm a native Utahan, so I have the privilege of knowing what real snow is.
![]()
What is this "ANTZ" you all keep mentioning? Seriously I've heard this in a few other threads as well. What is it? Slang for something?