Would you Vape if...

[Bunnykiller]

would you continue or even start vaping if juice produced no visible clouds what so ever?
There still would be all the goodness vaping supplies, the TH the nic, the flavor, the filling sensation in the lungs etc... but no form of any mist, cloud, vapor on exhale...

and do you think vaping would still be Public Enemy #2 if no cloud was emitted?

just wondering....

 

[daleron]

Interesting question Bunnykiller

Never thought about it, but probably not. I'm not a cloud chaser or sub'omh'er but would expect to see the same results as a cig.

I do think the huge clouds have contributed to the "hate" for Vaping, however, some of the equipment now days is unusual looking and would probably draw unnecessary attention anyway.

 

[Big Me]

No, probably not. For me, visible vapour is an indication that my setup is working properly.

I also think of it as an adult version of blowing bubbles, which I find fun!

 

[Bunnykiller]

No, probably not. For me, visible vapour is an indication that my setup is working properly.

I also think of it as an adult version of blowing bubbles, which I find fun!

ahhh only because it is that way now... working vape produces clouds... Im leaning towards even in the beginning, no vapor was produced, only way to tell it was working was by the flavor and TH etc...

 

[The Ocelot]

I'm not sure. I'd have to try it before I could say. I like the clouds, but if they weren't option I'd have to get nic from somewhere and it's still the best method I can think of.

As far as public perception, at this point I don't think it would make any difference. We're already on radar. I'm sure the media would spin it as something like, Vapers try to get around bans!

 

[edyle]

would you continue or even start vaping if juice produced no visible clouds what so ever?
There still would be all the goodness vaping supplies, the TH the nic, the flavor, the filling sensation in the lungs etc... but no form of any mist, cloud, vapor on exhale...

and do you think Vaping would still be Public Enemy #2 if no cloud was emitted?

just wondering....

1: no
2: no

 

[Bunnykiller]

I'm not sure. I'd have to try it before I could say. I like the clouds, but if they weren't option I'd have to get nic from somewhere and it would be the best method I can think of.

As far as public perception, at this point I don't think it would make any difference. I'm sure the media would spin it as something like, Vapers try to get around bans!

do you think the bans would have been placed if no vapor was seen?

 

[Big Me]

ahhh only because it is that way now... working vape produces clouds... Im leaning towards even in the beginning, no vapor was produced, only way to tell it was working was by the flavor and TH etc...

There are eliquids available that don't produce any vapour, such as Clear Steam by JAC Vapour in the UK.

 

[coolerat]

No.

Without the cloud its just another NRT and there are better ways to handle that.

And since I can pop a lozange or put on a patch and be anywhere anytime its actually better in that regard.

But for whatever reason the cloud helps.

 

[Bunnykiller]

There are eliquids available that don't produce any vapour, such as Clear Steam by JAC Vapour in the UK.

didnt know that... but do they taste good?

 

[coolerat]

do you think the bans would have been placed if no vapor was seen?

All the bans I live under have been in place 3-5 years and those were very small clouds then.

 

[Big Me]

didnt know that... but do they taste good?

Absolutely no idea. They're only available in 12mg and I vape 1mg! I'd take two tokes and would get nic sick. Lol

They're very high PG, which is good for flavour but not clouds.

 

[motordude]

I would use it.
I'm only here for the nicotine.

 

[The Ocelot]

do you think the bans would have been placed if no vapor was seen?

I think there would have been less of a problem if the devices had been vaporless from the beginning. It probably been viewed like patches, gum, lozenges or even lollipops

While the FDA might still have tried to regulate it, I doubt they would have put forth as much effort. There wouldn't be as much money from coming from BT to gain control of the market.

I think the main problem isn't clouds or flavors or corrupting children or allegedly caring about our health, it's because we are enjoying becoming smoke free. People who smoke aren't people, they are smokers. Smokers are bad, smokers are weak, smokers ruin the health and happiness of everyone around them. They should not be allowed to enjoy quitting. They should suffer. They should pay for their sins. Look at the Nicotrol Inhaler (which it still around), no one seems to have a problem with it. It looks like smoking, well, sort of, but most importantly it doesn't look fun.

 

[Big Me]

I think there would have been less of a problem if the devices had been vaporless from the beginning. It probably been viewed like patches, gum, lozenges or even lollipops

While the FDA might still have tried to regulate it, I doubt they would have put forth as much effort. There wouldn't be as much money from coming from BT to gain control of the market.

I think the main problem isn't clouds or flavors or corrupting children or allegedly caring about our health, it's because we are enjoying becoming smoke free. People who smoke aren't people, they are smokers. Smokers are bad, smokers are weak, smokers ruin the health and happiness of everyone around them. They should not be allowed to enjoy quitting. They should suffer. They should pay for their sins. Look at the Nicotrol Inhaler (which it still around), one seems to have a problem with it. It looks like smoking, well, sort of, but most importantly it doesn't look fun.

No, the inhalator looks like you're sucking on a plastic tampon.

 

[The Ocelot]

No, the inhalator looks like you're sucking on a plastic tampon.

I meant the shape and being sucked on. In reality you must admit that the inhaler looks more like smoking a cigarette than a box mod does.

On another front: candy cigarettes and cigars are still being sold. They aren't carried by many retailers, but they are out there. I guess it's not important to protect children from mixed messages.

Amazon.com : Candy Cigarettes, 24 Count : Candy And Chocolate Snack Size Bars : Grocery & Gourmet Food

 

[aceswired]

So all the people who answered no ... what if you were struck blind tomorrow? You'd quit vaping?

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk

 

[Two_Bears]

would you continue or even start vaping if juice produced no visible clouds what so ever?
There still would be all the goodness vaping supplies, the TH the nic, the flavor, the filling sensation in the lungs etc... but no form of any mist, cloud, vapor on exhale...

and do you think Vaping would still be Public Enemy #2 if no cloud was emitted?

just wondering....

That is already possible if you want to vape 100% PG.

 

[Toronnah]

Definite yes.

The lung feel is what I need. Nicotine is the least addictive part of smoking. Behavioral and physical sensation is the hardest part to give up.

 

[Big Me]

So all the people who answered no ... what if you were struck blind tomorrow? You'd quit vaping?

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk

It's entirely possible.