me - "Can you please tell me which of your concentrated flavors have acetoin, acetyl and/or diacetyl in them?"
Nude Nic (Jake Rubenstein
"Hello, thank you very much for your email! All flavors under our nude nicotine light up test
under the limits of detection for all three molecules. All of our flavors start from
entirely natural ingredients, and those three molecules are present in very limited quantities therein, always under the limits of detection . Which flavors caught your eye that you might be interested in? Know that the reason for us avoiding certain cream and custard flavor in higher concentrations is to avoid this fact

"
I think he meant "line up" rather than light up?
'Dunno (light up/line up) neither seems to make sense to me.
What/whose "limits"? We've seen one test that showed <.4% diacetyl with the two letters (ND) following, meaning Not Detected. But .39% (or much less) is way over the NIOSH recommendations.
On the other hand, the difference between 'naturally occuring'. 'natural isolates' and 'synthetics" means a lot to us (but we understand others don't make this distinction). We know the synthetic diketones are NOT naturally occuring (they are synthetics) and cause various levels of harm (from all manner of tests AND actual empirical/real evidence). But nobody ever developed popcorn lung from working in the 'milk & butter rooms' of dairies & bakeries.
To explain (fwiw): If there happens to be very small trace amounts of these chemicals mixed in with the myriads of other 'natural occuring chemicals', our concern level drops substantially (but not entirely). There's cyanide in apple seeds, but eating one doesn't worry us. However, if the 'naturally occuring' cyanide is extracted, stripped away from the hundreds of other natural chemicals, isolated and put in my food - then that's not natural, and far more capable of causing harm than a whole/natural apple seed. And the synthetic version may be capable of even more harm.
:::going to check the original thread to see if I can clear up my confusion:::
Nope, now I'm even MORE confused...
Quote Originally Posted by ~Sue~Feb2012 View Post
Good evening
I have a question about acetoin as I've been trying to read this entire thread from the beginning to be informed. But I'm confused because on one page it's say not used, here On 1/12/2014
Then On 1/19/2014 it is used as the go-to?
I could be mis-reading stuff, or been reading too much fear-mongering elsewhere. I'll continue reading.
Thanks in advance for any enlightenment.
No you are not crazy, TYPO detected! The original statement should read diacetyl free, not acetoin free.
We have detected quantities over the LOD for acetoin, but never for diacety (at least for lots in production
tons of batches have made their way to the dumpster with amounts over the LOD with diacetyl in the past). The flavors with cream bases that have the potential for diacetyl have been eliminated and replaced with bases manufactured with acetoin as a substitute.
What would we do without you guys, covering our butts

Good eye Sue!
So this appears that the acetoin is not there due to using a plant extract that happens to contain a bit, but rather it is a chemical that is added.
LOD = Limit of Detection (???)
:::sigh of frustration::: Chemists and 'naturalists' have entirely different beliefs on "chemicals", and we don't have time/energy for the always-inevitable-never-ending debate/discussion that's likely to ensue if we ask for clarification. Chemists typically believe that synthetics, isolates and those occuring naturally (in the midst of dozens/hundreds of other atural chemicals) - all have the same action in the body, while 'naturalists' disagree. So (typically) a chemist working with synthetic or chemical isolates may say they are 'natural ingredients' (because the same chemical does appear in nature).
Just saw the latest posts in this thread.
Such beating around the bush makes me grumpy. "Very limited quantities" in whose opinion? "Under the limits of detection" by what method? No actual numbers to report, hmpf. At least they were polite, but that's not enough to get my money.
EDIT: meant to add a THANK YOU to vangrl and we2 for trying to pry out the information!
We agree with HIC!...only it makes us
VERY grumpy.