Acetyl Proprionyl, Diacetyl, Acetoine HELP

Status
Not open for further replies.

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
Do you have credible evidence their eliquids or flavorings contain anything?

--From OSHA we know what chemicals are commonly used to create certain flavors in the food flavoring industry. https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib10142010.html.
--We know that virtually all vaping flavors are food flavorings (and fall under the regulations & industry standards for the same).
--We know that when FA & TFA tested their flavors adequately (and the results are available on TFA's Spec Sheets & Components), that the results match what OSHA lists.
--We can see that FW flat-out lied regarding the contents of their flavors.
--We know that some major manufacturers/vendors (like Capellas & LorAnn) readily admit to using diketones, when directly asked (afterall, they are food flavors and those chemical are 'industry standard' and GRAS for ingestion), but they either haven't tested their flavors at the specific levels needed, or haven't made the test results/ingredient lists-amounts available...so the the presence of 'inhalation risk chemicals' is unknown to most vapers.
--We know that many of VZ's Gourmet line contain diacetyl, but that is not dislcosed to buyers.
--We know that many of these flavors do cause various levels of irritation (from reports of the same on ECF, our own personal experience, and reports on the internet).
--We know we can taste these flavors, and have been trained how to do so by Linda at TFA. It is safe to assume that when we can taste these chemicals (and we have a very valid source of information for comparison, like TFAs Component list and the OSHA list), that we have a very credible reason to question vendors about the content of their flavors.

The question that should be asked, is does anyone have any credible evidence to cause anyone to think these chemicals are not present in food flavors being sold for vaping?

It's more fear mongering and witch hunt, which I see more for steering people to certain vendors.

We respect your right to feel & believe whatever you feel & believe. But it is not 'fear mongering' or 'witch hunting' to want to know (yea, even demand solid evidence) of what chemicals are in what we inhale into our lungs...especially not when it has been proven that certain chemicals that are commonly used ARE inhalation risks.

Edit: There is certainly nothing wrong with letting other vapers known which vendors have tested/disclosed the inhalation risk chemicals in their juices...or that FA has gone to the immense expense to support the vaping community by reformulating their flavors to be free of the same.

I haven't attacked any poster, but lots of folks have made insinuations that aren't backed by facts. They aren't testing because of this thread, but because folks have been calling with fear BECAUSE of the threads in here.
We assume you're referring to MBV (underlined "they" above). Are you an official representative of MBV? MBV assigned you to publicize what you're saying?

Perhaps people are "afraid" of inhaling chemicals that are proven to be inhalation risks. There's certainly nothing wrong with that...particularly not in the world of vaping where the intense use of the food flavorings has only been prevalent for a handful of years. (Yes, e-cigs go back further, but the earlier 'flavors' were primarily tobacco). Just like with alcohol and/or smoking tobacco, many people do recognize that serious harm may not be seen or recognized for years. Hence, they may be alarmed to find that the food flavors they're ingesting into their lungs may indeed contain chemicals that are known 'inhalation risks'.

Yes, I am for all the health stuff. Yes, I've been juicing, organic eating, green cleaning (haven't had chemicals in house for 4 years, and have lost 45 lbs), and believe in clean vaping..

If testing hadn't been done on your produce & foods, and proper identification, standards and labeling been demanded...you wouldn't know what was organic and what was not. If there weren't an 'ingredient list' on household cleaning/other products, you wouldn't know what was in them so that you would have the ability to make an informed choice.

The products & foods we eat have at leaset SOME level of "regulation" and testing/disclosure requirements that forces sellers to reveal certain chemicals. But "food flavors" fall under the FDA "GRAS for ingestion" rule...and that means that levels known to be harmful for inhalation can be included in the flavorings without any type of specific testing or disclosure.

But when someone says they don't have something in the juice, nothing is good enough for the we2rcool unless it comes certified (close to certification demanded by the FDA), yet they don't like the FDA in another post.

No one in this thread (including us) are to blame for NIOSH's safe exposure levels. Nor is any poster responsible for the fact that testing 'beyond the typical' is required to reveal the amounts that exceed safe exposure levels. However, there are two manufacture/vendors that have had the integrity to take it upon themselves to recognize this issue, and provide the information necessary that will allow vapers to make a truly informed choice. Those that haven't, should have already.

I can disagree with wethinks, and I have not attacked them. But Hoosiers, and a few others in this thread (or others along the same lines), had valid points, and no one commented on them.

We don't "own" this thread, nor do we represent anyone but ourselves. If there are posters that have been hurt or offended at the lack of responses, then they're free to say so. If posters have disagreed with the basic ideas, concerns, and/or facts presented in this thread, then other posters have responded (or not) 'as they will'. We2 certainly have no need to enter into discusions about others 'beliefs & opinions' when we disagree with them. We're doing our best to stick with the facts.
Thought I would bring your attention up and away. Looks like I did. Reread, and you will see it does not violate forum guidelines. However, it seems to validate following the entire thread, and it's progression. Wethinks does great in other threads, but this is beyond obsession. Vangirl brought up some great test results, but wethinks is taking it beyond. Sorry if offended, but methinks on my own, and my points of view are valid also. (PS, I love pets, and despite yourthinks, you have great contributions also).

What you call an "obsession", we call the basic human right to know what it in the substances they intend to buy & inhale...so they have the right to make an informed choice. What you call Vangirl's "taking it beyond" (when exposing diacetyl levels in the millions of ppb from a vendor that claims "diacetyl free") was what most would refer to as simply 'exposing the truth', again, so that every vaper in the vaping community could have the simple right to make an informed choice as to what chemicals they inhale...rather than dousing themselves with very high levels of diacetyl unknowingly.

Some of us had enough of that kind of crap from Big Tobacco. Perhaps people that were concerned about the chemicals & additives to cigarettes were also called "fear mongers" and "witch hunters" back in the day. Wethinks it's pathetic that people who recognize the dangers of toxic chemicals, do nothing about it themselves (or attack others that are doing something).
 
Last edited:

zmbgzus

Senior Member
May 12, 2014
159
79
USA
]All of the chemicals in question here heavily saturate our daily lives as it is. Removing a few ppm isn't going to make a difference. Just because we're suddenly becoming aware through the chemistry of vaping, it doesn't mean that these chemicals suddenly just appeared. Buying diacetyl free isn't going to eliminate exposure. [/SIZE]
 
Last edited:

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
All of the chemicals in question here heavily saturate our daily lives as it is. Removing a few ppm isn't going to make a difference. Just because we're suddenly becoming aware through the chemistry of vaping, it doesn't mean that these chemicals suddenly just appeared. Buying diacetyl free isn't going to eliminate exposure.

Actually, the artificial diacetyl/diketones do not 'heavily saturate' our daily lives. It's only the heated vapor in parts per billion that have been shown to be inhalation risks. And not exposing oneself to those chemicals/levels does indeed, prevent one from developing the lung/respiratory issues known to be caused by them.

We all deserve the right to make an informed choice about what we inhale. And we also deserve the right to continue our discussion without the risk of having it 'closed down' due to these kinds of posts.
 

Sdh

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 31, 2010
10,509
17,194
U.S.
We all deserve the right to make an informed choice about what we inhale. And we also deserve the right to continue our discussion without the risk of having it 'closed down' due to these kinds of posts.
I totally agree. I really hope the flavoring study is released soon. If one chooses to vape diacetyl it is a personal choice. I prefer my lungs disease free. I have taken care of too many patients who have presented with respiratory failure. It is not a fate I choose.
 
Last edited:

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
It is a concern, I've posted several issues in regards to research, and more so along the lines of how the diketones turn into diacetyl when heated with pg and flavorings, when no diacetyl was present in the flavorings to begin with.

And guess what? The vendors HAD NO IDEA!!

But to say FA isperfectly free, while every other vendor is not unless they publish a paper akin to what the FDA wants anyways, well, what is it exactly that this thread wants?

The original thread was to state the vendors and flavors without diacetyl, then the accompanying AA, and other diketones. The other diketones were used when diacetyl was pronounced unsafe, and further research showed that they broke down into diacetyl anyways. If you love vanilla, there isn't one perfectly safe vape according to this thread.

Back the accusations with science.

What are we supposed to do? Buy every flavor and e-liquid and pay to have them tested so that we'll have the right to make an informed choice? (not!) It's the vendors that create & profit from their sale that carry the responsibility of knowing, testing & disclosing the ingredients in the flavors & juices they sell to vapers.
 

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
I totally agree that we have every right to know. These chemicals are already heavily produced via plastic, wood, vinyl manufacturing, distilleries as well. With the insane amount of our production rates, our lives are heavily saturated.

Wow, we had no idea so many different industries were implicated. Thanks heavens we're not inhaling them directly like we do via vaping (or those that may be exposed 'in the industry'). Thanks for sharing that.
 

ImperfectFuture

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2014
332
340
Seattle
--From OSHA we know what chemicals are commonly used to create certain flavors in the food flavoring industry. https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib10142010.html.
--We know that virtually all vaping flavors are food flavorings (and fall under the regulations & industry standards for the same).
--We know that when FA & TFA tested their flavors adequately (and the results are available on TFA's Spec Sheets & Components), that the results match what OSHA lists.
--We can see that FW flat-out lied regarding the contents of their flavors.
--We know that some major manufacturers/vendors (like Capellas & LorAnn) readily admit to using diketones, when directly asked (afterall, they are food flavors and those chemical are 'industry standard' and GRAS for ingestion), but they either haven't tested their flavors at the specific levels needed, or haven't made the test results/ingredient lists-amounts available...so the the presence of 'inhalation risk chemicals' is unknown to most vapers.
--We know that many of VZ's Gourmet line contain diacetyl, but that is not dislcosed to buyers.
--We know that many of these flavors do cause various levels of irritation (from reports of the same on ECF, our own personal experience, and reports on the internet).
--We know we can taste these flavors, and have been trained how to do so by Linda at TFA. It is safe to assume that when we can taste these chemicals (and we have a very valid source of information for comparison, like TFAs Component list and the OSHA list), that we have a very credible reason to question vendors about the content of their flavors.

The question that should be asked, is does anyone have any credible evidence to cause anyone to think these chemicals are not present in food flavors being sold for vaping?

Reports on ecf, our own experience, and people just posting "I can taste it" is not science.

You have the right to question, but that is not CREDIBLE SCIENCE. What you are listing is akin to bullet points built for talking points, more political than factual (me done phd work).


We respect your right to feel & believe whatever you feel & believe. But it is not 'fear mongering' or 'witch hunting' to want to know (yea, even demand solid evidence) of what chemicals are in what we inhale into our lungs...especially not when it has been proven that certain chemicals that are commonly used ARE inhalation risks.

Demanding is in fact witch hunting. Asking is one thing. How can you demand? Just don't buy. But unless you plan on some public unrest protests, demanding from businesses, requires government intervention, I was under the belief you were not in favor of the FDA intervention. The interviews from vp live team that everyone likes to quote (go to the test results @ 1:21, conveniently bypassing vapinggreeks guest speaking that's WHY we need FDA regulation), you oppose FDA intervention?

Edit: There is certainly nothing wrong with letting other vapers known which vendors have tested/disclosed the inhalation risk chemicals in their juices...or that FA has gone to the immense expense to support the vaping community by reformulating their flavors to be free of the same.

Methinks that has been the basis behind a lot of this (which brings us back to "EVEN DEMAND" (yes, I remember khan on the star trek movies), is more a rallying cry than a well thought out rebuttal.

We assume you're referring to MBV (underlined "they" above). Are you an official representative of MBV? MBV assigned you to publicize what you're saying?

Of course, anyone disagreeing with the basic premise, must be working for them (hey, I don't even affiliate for anyone, how bout wethinks?)

Perhaps people are "afraid" of inhaling chemicals that are proven to be inhalation risks. There's certainly nothing wrong with that...particularly not in the world of vaping where the intense use of the food flavorings has only been prevalent for a handful of years. (Yes, e-cigs go back further, but the earlier 'flavors' were primarily tobacco). Just like with alcohol and/or smoking tobacco, many people do recognize that serious harm may not be seen or recognized for years. Hence, they may be alarmed to find that the food flavors they're ingesting into their lungs may indeed contain chemicals that are known 'inhalation risks'.

It's one thing to have your own views , but your demands, and the insistence it's your responsibility to protect us from ourselves, hhhmm, just interjecting a thought here, but that does sound a tad hedonistic (the feeling I got towards the end of this thread, and not so much in your older posts).

If testing hadn't been done on your produce & foods, and proper identification, standards and labeling been demanded...you wouldn't know what was organic and what was not. If there weren't an 'ingredient list' on household cleaning/other products, you wouldn't know what was in them so that you would have the ability to make an informed choice.

Again, assumption. I make all my own household supplies, dish detergent, cleaner, shampoo, laundry detergent, alternative bleach, , floor cleaner, etc. I actually make my own informed choice by making it myself. And I buy whole foods, so there is no ingredient list. The cats get canned (okay, I do get plain hummus to mix, and I do eat tortillas instead of bread, but I din't use the crock pot for steeping). Yep, part of that phd work involved human physiology and biochemistry. But, it was done in the 80's, yet the economic collapse I predicted using the bell curve for 2010 was DANG close.

The products & foods we eat have at leaset SOME level of "regulation" and testing/disclosure requirements that forces sellers to reveal certain chemicals. But "food flavors" fall under the FDA "GRAS for ingestion" rule...and that means that levels known to be harmful for inhalation can be included in the flavorings without any type of specific testing or disclosure.

Actually, the acetoins and other diketones transforming into diacetyl, exactly how we're they supposed to test for that? Some diketones simply evolve as part of a chemical reaction (using any bleach in your household?)

No one in this thread (including us) are to blame for NIOSH's safe exposure levels. Nor is any poster responsible for the fact that testing 'beyond the typical' is required to reveal the amounts that exceed safe exposure levels. However, there are two manufacture/vendors that have had the integrity to take it upon themselves to recognize this issue, and provide the information necessary that will allow vapers to make a truly informed choice. Those that haven't, should have already.

Once again, are you looking to build a coalition here? I don't know you. You are adding fuel to the side that wants to get rid of flavors. Be careful what you wish for. Letting us know was great, but YOU KEEP BRINGING IT UP (hence, what is behind this effort?)

We don't "own" this thread, nor do we represent anyone but ourselves. If there are posters that have been hurt or offended at the lack of responses, then they're free to say so. If posters have disagreed with the basic ideas, concerns, and/or facts presented in this thread, then other posters have responded (or not) 'as they will'. We2 certainly have no need to enter into discusions about others 'beliefs & opinions' when we disagree with them. We're doing our best to stick with the facts.

From my above remarks, it feels like you do. When anyone challenges you, down come the bricks, and the bullet points, and the"YOU ARE RIGHT", and someone else must have an agenda, because you certainly don't (not, and that WE stuff gets REALLY old after many, many long posts repeating the same stuff. Wethinks (me and the cats, note the word me), that the cuteness has worn off, you really like the NSA stuff, or someone needs to separate you at birth.

What you call an "obsession", we call the basic human right to know what it in the substances they intend to buy & inhale...so they have the right to make an informed choice. What you call Vangirl's "taking it beyond" (when exposing diacetyl levels in the millions of ppb from a vendor that claims "diacetyl free") was what most would refer to as simply 'exposing the truth', again, so that every vaper in the vaping community could have the simple right to make an informed choice as to what chemicals they inhale...rather than dousing themselves with very high levels of diacetyl unknowingly.

Okay, basic human rights, shouldn't have smoked in the first place, again be careful what you wish for, FDA will take care of that for you (democrat, republican, libertarian, abstaining?) and, again you didn't read. Vangirl wasn't taking it beyond, wethinks was (do be careful with the reading comprehension, helps in discerning scientific data and FDA proposals, you know, the documents that matter at the moment?)

Some of us had enough of that kind of crap from Big Tobacco. Perhaps people that were concerned about the chemicals & additives to cigarettes were also called "fear mongers" and "witch hunters" back in the day. Wethinks it's pathetic that people who 7recognize the dangers of toxic chemicals, do nothing about it themselves (or attack others that are doing something).

Le basic psychology 101, we hate most in others what we hate of ourselves. I'm not attacking you (well, the wethinks is getting really old). I'm attacking your premise and pseudo science. And when folks have demands, believe they know for others what are basic human rights (instead of focusing within, but hey, smokers are/were addicts, so nothing to work on the inside huh?), and keep fear mongering with false allegations (no proof, and this is a virgin industry, but wethinks is gonna fix it), it's more like starting a war. What did I choose to do when quit smoking? Do a little web work, work on my fico scores, study and invest more in the market, and try to relearn all new routines (yes, quitting, even if smoking 5 a day like I did, interrupts many routines built over the years.)

And accusations without sound basis, demands, and you know better than the general populace, is fear mongering, not a comparison of your angelic stance that you are fighting the war against big tobacco in the early days (or, why did YOU, not WE, start smoking?)

PS, I also make own hair rinse, face scrub and moisturizer, deodorant, and anything else that you need to buy (heck, watch Mo Impact Man for some good ideas, though I was making most of my supplies before that movie came out). And I do eat cheese, which also lists ingredients, but will eventually make own hummus base.

PPS, this is dang hard on an iPad 2.
 
Last edited:

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
Reports on ecf, our own experience, and people just posting "I can taste it" is not science.

You have the right to question, but that is not CREDIBLE SCIENCE. What you are listing is akin to bullet points built for talking points, more political than factual (me done phd work).




Demanding is in fact witch hunting. Asking is one thing. How can you demand? Just don't buy. But unless you plan on some public unrest protests, demanding from businesses, requires government intervention, I was under the belief you were not in favor of the FDA intervention. The interviews from vp live team that everyone likes to quote (go to the test results @ 1:21, conveniently bypassing vapinggreeks guest speaking that's WHY we need FDA regulation), you oppose FDA intervention?



Methinks that has been the basis behind a lot of this (which brings us back to "EVEN DEMAND" (yes, I remember khan on the star trek movies), is more a rallying cry than a well thought out rebuttal.



Of course, anyone disagreeing with the basic premise, must be working for them (hey, I don't even affiliate for anyone, how bout wethinks?)



It's one thing to have your own views , but your demands, and the insistence it's your responsibility to protect us from ourselves, hhhmm, just interjecting a thought here, but that does sound a tad hedonistic (the feeling I got towards the end of this thread, and not so much in your older posts).



Again, assumption. I make all my own household supplies, dish detergent, cleaner, shampoo, laundry detergent, alternative bleach, , floor cleaner, etc. I actually make my own informed choice by making it myself. And I buy whole foods, so there is no ingredient list. The cats get canned (okay, I do get plain hummus to mix, and I do eat tortillas instead of bread, but I din't use the crock pot for steeping). Yep, part of that phd work involved human physiology and biochemistry. But, it was done in the 80's, yet the economic collapse I predicted using the bell curve for 2010 was DANG close.



Actually, the acetoins and other diketones transforming into diacetyl, exactly how we're they supposed to test for that? Some diketones simply evolve as part of a chemical reaction (using any bleach in your household?)



Once again, are you looking to build a coalition here? I don't know you. You are adding fuel to the side that wants to get rid of flavors. Be careful what you wish for. Letting us know was great, but YOU KEEP BRINGING IT UP (hence, what is behind this effort?)



From my above remarks, it feels like you do. When anyone challenges you, down come the bricks, and the bullet points, and the"YOU ARE RIGHT", and someone else must have an agenda, because you certainly don't (not, and that WE stuff gets REALLY old after many, many long posts repeating the same stuff. Wethinks (me and the cats, note the word me), that the cuteness has worn off, you really like the NSA stuff, or someone needs to separate you at birth.



Okay, basic human rights, shouldn't have smoked in the first place, again be careful what you wish for, FDA will take care of that for you (democrat, republican, libertarian, abstaining?) and, again you didn't read. Vangirl wasn't taking it beyond, wethinks was (do be careful with the reading comprehension, helps in discerning scientific data and FDA proposals, you know, the documents that matter at the moment?)



Le basic psychology 101, we hate most in others what we hate of ourselves. I'm not attacking you (well, the wethinks is getting really old). I'm attacking your premise and pseudo science. And when folks have demands, believe they know for others what are basic human rights (instead of focusing within, but hey, smokers are/were addicts, so nothing to work on the inside huh?), and keep fear mongering with false allegations (no proof, and this is a virgin industry, but wethinks is gonna fix it), it's more like starting a war. What did I choose to do when quit smoking? Do a little web work, work on my fico scores, study and invest more in the market, and try to relearn all new routines (yes, quitting, even if smoking 5 a day like I did, interrupts many routines built over the years.)

And accusations without sound basis, demands, and you know better than the general populace, is fear mongering, not a comparison of your angelic stance that you are fighting the war against big tobacco in the early days (or, why did YOU, not WE, start smoking?)

PS, I also make own hair rinse, face scrub and moisturizer, deodorant, and anything else that you need to buy (heck, watch Mo Impact Man for some good ideas, though I was making most of my supplies before that movie came out). And I do eat cheese, which also lists ingredients, but will eventually make own hummus base.

PPS, this is dang hard on an iPad 2.

Been here, done this, know all the possible outcomes. If we respond to each point, then each point will be dissected and our meaning & intent will be even further misconstrued (as evidenced above). If we respond briefly, then we'll be accused of skirting "valid points" that we know and believe are not valid at all. One small example: the valid science, research and testing presented throughout this thread speaks for itself, yet you nit-pick at a few statements regarding taste-testing and reports of adverse reactions and conclude 'not credible'.

Nothing we do or say in response will help vapers and the vaping community to learn the truth or be any closer to obtaining the information they need to be able to make an informed choice regarding chemicals that are known to be inhalation risks. And if we say more or respond further, we'll just be handing you a microphone to continue posting and misconstruing.

Please feel free to believe what you want to believe - nothing we say is going to make any difference anyway.

Kudos for all of your accomplishments.
 
Last edited:

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
Do you have credible evidence their eliquids or flavorings contain anything? It's more fear mongering and witch hunt, which I see more for steering people to certain vendors. I haven't attacked any poster, but lots of folks have made insinuations that aren't backed by facts. They aren't testing because of this thread, but because folks have been calling with fear BECAUSE of the threads in here.

Yes, I am for all the health stuff. Yes, I've been juicing, organic eating, green cleaning (haven't had chemicals in house for 4 years, and have lost 45 lbs), and believe in clean vaping. But when someone says they don't have something in the juice, nothing is good enough for the we2rcool unless it comes certified (close to certification demanded by the FDA), yet they don't like the FDA in another post.

I can disagree with wethinks, and I have not attacked them. But Hoosiers, and a few others in this thread (or others along the same lines), had valid points, and no one commented on them.

Thought I would bring your attention up and away. Looks like I did. Reread, and you will see it does not violate forum guidelines. However, it seems to validate following the entire thread, and it's progression. Wethinks does great in other threads, but this is beyond obsession. Vangirl brought up some great test results, but wethinks is taking it beyond. Sorry if offended, but methinks on my own, and my points of view are valid also. (PS, I love pets, and despite yourthinks, you have great contributions also).

" They aren't testing because of this thread, but because folks have been calling with fear BECAUSE of the threads in here."

Really? that's a bit scary that MBV who used Flavor West for years and saw the tests and this thread would STILL not take it upon themselves to do a bit of testing. That it took scared customers calling them to finally get the ball rolling is a bit disturbing, are they not one of the largest e-juice makers in the U.S?
 

Jonathan Tittle

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2013
1,608
1,003
40
Johnson City, TN, USA
xanderjuice.com
So MBV is actually going to test their flavors/flavorings? Hmm I would hope all vendors would/should be doing this anyway. The study from Dr. F will be coming out soon.

I would imagine that the majority are not, simply due to the cost of GC/MS testing which, from what I've researched, ranges from $50-$120 per sample. For a vendor with 200 flavors, such as MBV, on the high end that's $24,000, not including the cost of samples and shipping and $10,000 on the low end, again, not including the cost of samples and shipping.

I'm sure there's probably a discount for bulk business, as is the case with most, though with a $10-$24,000 price tag, I don't think you're honestly going to see too many vendors jumping on it unless they can secure quality low-cost testing that will be able to validate chemical presence with accuracy.

I've seen some labs offer testing for $20, though let's be realistic, you get what you pay for. Most labs techs in a high-end lab don't come to work for $20/hour. Nurses barely do.


To give others an idea, this is what I've found:

$50 / Sample - Mass Spectrometry Facility

$50 / Sample - Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility

$60 / Sample - Mass Spectrometry, Biological Applications, and High-Throughput Proteomics Facility

$70 / Sample - Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Facility

$120 / Sample - Advanced Analytical Testing Service



And many others that are Priced on Request; meaning no public pricing.
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
"For a vendor with 200 flavors, such as MBV, on the high end that's $24,000, not including the cost of samples and shipping and $10,000 on the low end, again, not including the cost of samples and shipping."

Drop in the bucket, and just the cost of doing business.

Maple Leaf Vapes is a Canadian e-juice makers that offers over 200 flavours and they are in the process of testing every single flavour that they use. They probably do 1/100th the business MBV does.

"Maple Leaf Vapes is taking this issue very very seriously. We are now going to spend alot of time, money, and man hours to go threw every flavour with the finest of the fine toothed combs to make sure any flavours we use DO NOT contain diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin. We have too been told by manufacturers oh no no our flavour dont contain any diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin and I caught one that does.......I have 2 people right now working fulltime to insure any and all flavourings that use diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin depending on amount I will either take off the site, or be transparent about it. We have set aside thousands of dollars for testing, research and development, and even have a chemist who is willing to help us get threw this. So far the test we have done have shown ND for diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin. but there are more flavours that have yet to be tested. We are going to replace flavours found to have diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin with the same flavours from companies that have proven to us do not have any diacetyl/acetylpropionyl/acetoin in that flavouring"
 

ImperfectFuture

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2014
332
340
Seattle
" They aren't testing because of this thread, but because folks have been calling with fear BECAUSE of the threads in here."

Really? that's a bit scary that MBV who used Flavor West for years and saw the tests and this thread would STILL not take it upon themselves to do a bit of testing. That it took scared customers calling them to finally get the ball rolling is a bit disturbing, are they not one of the largest e-juice makers in the U.S?

They were not following this thread. No idea when I called. People weren't mentioning tis thread. They haven't been using flavor west since last October (except for maybe some fruit flavors). When they ran out of butterscotch, they switched to another vendor. Plus, Hoosier is not that concerned, nor are several other members throughout the forum. You are in Canada, keep debating the flavor issue, and no problem, they will be gone (unless you do it yourself). PS, mt baker isn't going anywhere, so they are ready for FDA regs.

Just a little thought along the lines of that vp live team broadcast link you posted.

What they took offense at was people claiming in this thread that they could taste diacetyl in the juices. They didn't know this was going on, I brought it to their attention, which made sense as to the phone calls they were getting.

Believe it or not, I don't try to insist on something you can't see nor hear.
 

Jonathan Tittle

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2013
1,608
1,003
40
Johnson City, TN, USA
xanderjuice.com
"For a vendor with 200 flavors, such as MBV, on the high end that's $24,000, not including the cost of samples and shipping and $10,000 on the low end, again, not including the cost of samples and shipping."

Drop in the bucket, and just the cost of doing business.

For some, yes, but not all. For a start-up launching tomorrow (as an example), that's $10-$20k more they need to invest (or raise, if they are raising capital) before they even open their doors and it's an expense to them that isn't truly warranted if, and a big IF, flavor manufacturers provided this information upfront, as they should.

It's not as if an vendors are trying to reverse engineer a flavor, they're simply looking for and asking about 3 primary chemicals and manufacturers of the raw ingredients should already know whether or not these chemicals are in the flavor or not. From what I've read, it's a scientific art and it's not the art of "let's just slap some chemicals together and call it a day" - it's either in there or it's not.

GC/MS testing is costly. Raw Ingredient suppliers that create these flavors to begin with can't honestly say "I dunno what's in there." If a flavor manufacturer and raw ingredient supplier are one in the same (which is how it appears to be for Hangsen), it makes no sense to say we don't know, when you do, it's just a matter of putting it on paper.
 

Sdh

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 31, 2010
10,509
17,194
U.S.
I would imagine that the majority are not, simply due to the cost of GC/MS testing which, from what I've researched, ranges from $50-$120 per sample. For a vendor with 200 flavors, such as MBV, on the high end that's $24,000, not including the cost of samples and shipping and $10,000 on the low end, again, not including the cost of samples and shipping.

I'm sure there's probably a discount for bulk business, as is the case with most, though with a $10-$24,000 price tag, I don't think you're honestly going to see too many vendors jumping on it unless they can secure quality low-cost testing that will be able to validate chemical presence with accuracy.

I've seen some labs offer testing for $20, though let's be realistic, you get what you pay for. Most labs techs in a high-end lab don't come to work for $20/hour. Nurses barely do.


To give others an idea, this is what I've found:

$50 / Sample - Mass Spectrometry Facility

$50 / Sample - Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility

$60 / Sample - Mass Spectrometry, Biological Applications, and High-Throughput Proteomics Facility

$70 / Sample - Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Facility

$120 / Sample - Advanced Analytical Testing Service



And many others that are Priced on Request; meaning no public pricing.
I think the flavor vendors should be performing this as well. However, it is the responsibility of a vendor to test their finished product. I believe only the strong and informed vendors will survive in this industry.
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
For some, yes, but not all. For a start-up launching tomorrow (as an example), that's $10-$20k more they need to invest (or raise, if they are raising capital) before they even open their doors and it's an expense to them that isn't truly warranted if, and a big IF, flavor manufacturers provided this information upfront, as they should.

It's not as if an vendors are trying to reverse engineer a flavor, they're simply looking for and asking about 3 primary chemicals and manufacturers of the raw ingredients should already know whether or not these chemicals are in the flavor or not. From what I've read, it's a scientific art and it's not the art of "let's just slap some chemicals together and call it a day" - it's either in there or it's not.

GC/MS testing is costly. Raw Ingredient suppliers that create these flavors to begin with can't honestly say "I dunno what's in there." If a flavor manufacturer and raw ingredient supplier are one in the same (which is how it appears to be for Hangsen), it makes no sense to say we don't know, when you do, it's just a matter of putting it on paper.

"a big IF, flavor manufacturers provided this information upfront, as they should."

totally agree with that. It appears that the thousands of e-juice makers all use the same 10 or so flavour manufacturers. It would make so much more sense for the flavour vendors to test for AA&D and show proof than the 1000's of e-juice vendors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread