Any experience with the 3100 mAh purple Efests?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davey59

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 29, 2014
799
857
Monroe WA
IMO, from a business standpoint not even Efest would be dumb enough to overstate the load ratings of a battery that much, while I do agree that the battery shape does actually appear almost identical without actual information related to the battery I simply refuse to believe that Efest would not only overstate the rating by that much but ALSO change the chemistry to IMR and label it as such.

Even if they were going to use a Panasonic Cell it would make more sense to use the NCR18650A which is rated at 3100mah, not 3000mah as the NCR18650BE cell you posted is. The NCR18650A is still only rated for a max of 2C, which is only 6Amps so it would make little sense for Efest to put that battery in a wrapper labeled 20A AND IMR to boot. This is honestly all speculation, if I'm able to get my hands on some of the 3100mah Purple Efests locally from a source I trust I'll rip the wrapper off and see what's going on underneath, which still may answer nothing at all.

This^^^^^

Somebody has something to gain and somebody will lose big when the litigation begins. Be it from personal injury or by false claims of fraudulent advertising.
 

beckdg

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 1, 2013
11,018
35,706
TN
Well I've seen many sites list the LG's as 35a so idk what to tell you. I never said if you open up LG's spec sheet it says 35a continuous. I said they are advertised as 35a all the time. And that page just isn't proof, neither is a bunch of people on a thread claiming something. Again, I'm NOT saying I trust them, I'm just calling for a little critical thinking. We need to quit believing stuff just because we read it on the Internet. I know, I know... If you read it on the Internet, it must be true, right?
When a decision is made to rely on published specs (a huge mistake with any electronics and more so with batteries), one must ALWAYS choose either the original manufacturers specs or preferably the lowest published specs available. Doing otherwise will always be a cause for concern. Relying on those specs to be even near what the electronics will see in daily use is almost always cause for concern as well. Unless you know the product and have proven it can do what you ask of it under the conditions it will be asked to do so without breaking a sweat or affecting performance it's still best to be cautious regardless if your electronics are spec'd as overkill or not.

It's a general unwritten rule such as assuming 20% efficiency or less for every consecutive component.
 

Baditude

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2012
30,394
73,077
71
Ridgeway, Ohio
http://vape.li/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Declaration-of-Efest-IMR18650-3100mah-battery.pdf

Appears that they are 10a continuous, 20a pulse. I'd say these only have a place in builds above 0.6 ohms or a DNA30 regulated mod.
A typical "disclaimer" notice if I ever saw one. Consider the reputation of the source making the statement. "Efest only sell original and high quality batteries." That's a lie right there, when Dampfakkus reveiled what is under the wrapper of the purple 2100mah 30 amp battery is a Sony VTS4 battery. Same identification code model numbers imprinted on the cell body.

EfestSony.jpg
 
Last edited:

Baditude

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2012
30,394
73,077
71
Ridgeway, Ohio
Froth said:
IMO, from a business standpoint not even Efest would be dumb enough to overstate the load ratings of a battery that much...
This^^^^^Somebody has something to gain and somebody will lose big when the litigation begins. Be it from personal injury or by false claims of fraudulent advertising.
China doesn't recognize international litigation claims, so good luck with any lawsuit plans. There is no governing body overlooking the battery industry, they are free to make whatever claims in advertising they wish. The only way to force a change from fraudulent advertising is to stop buying their products.
 
Last edited:

pnyc

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2014
146
121
xXx
If official datasheet published by LG isn't considered a proof, what do you call a proof.


Well I've seen many sites list the LG's as 35a so idk what to tell you. I never said if you open up LG's spec sheet it says 35a continuous. I said they are advertised as 35a all the time. And that page just isn't proof, neither is a bunch of people on a thread claiming something. Again, I'm NOT saying I trust them, I'm just calling for a little critical thinking. We need to quit believing stuff just because we read it on the Internet. I know, I know... If you read it on the Internet, it must be true, right?
 
Last edited:

suspectK

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2013
4,573
2,893
Alabummer
Go back and read my posts again, I was ONLY saying I wanted more proof on the 3100 mAh ones, which I actually went and found.

What proof? This letter from efest?



Edit- Proof from your position is testing the cells...do you need a load bank(or if you're fancy, you have a nice digital setup, and don't have to twist dials to change resistance), or do you have one?

Even throwing it in a mod and doing a load test on it would be better than a letter from a Chinese battery forger..
 
Last edited:

windxrunner

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 23, 2014
438
219
Portland, OR
It's at least better than some page where some dude basically says he feels they are a certain other battery. Efest admitted that their 35A batteries are 20A continuous in a letter, so them saying they admit they may be 10A continuous, but they feel they can handle 20A and that's why they say that is more trustworthy in my mind.
 

Baditude

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2012
30,394
73,077
71
Ridgeway, Ohio
It's at least better than some page where some dude basically says he feels they are a certain other battery. Efest admitted that their 35A batteries are 20A continuous in a letter, so them saying they admit they may be 10A continuous, but they feel they can handle 20A and that's why they say that is more trustworthy in my mind.

I see it differently. I see Efest getting caught in a lie and then forced to drag a foot in the dirt and say, "Shucks, we got caught stretching the truth."

If they admit that their battery is 20 amps, then why advertise right on the battery that its 35? :blink: If it wasn't for Dampfukkus, no one would have known the truth about these batteries.
 

suspectK

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2013
4,573
2,893
Alabummer
It's at least better than some page where some dude basically says he feels they are a certain other battery. Efest admitted that their 35A batteries are 20A continuous in a letter, so them saying they admit they may be 10A continuous, but they feel they can handle 20A and that's why they say that is more trustworthy in my mind.

"I see it differently." :);)

You're not getting 20 Amps out of this battery..maybe 10.. show me tests from two sources to discredit the other test, that's known of...
 

ProV P3T3

Full Member
Sep 3, 2014
53
31
707 Nor Cal
The purple Efest batteries work well, regardless of who really makes them. They rated the highest on my IQ meter (Input Quality) on the Provari P3 Beta. This precise meter monitors the battery quality. The purple Efest (18350) got a reading of 80 on the IQ meter, which is good. My new AW IMR (18350, Red) gets a reading of 65 at best. These ratings are based on a 1-100 scale.
 
Last edited:

windxrunner

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 23, 2014
438
219
Portland, OR
"I see it differently." :);)

You're not getting 20 Amps out of this battery..maybe 10.. show me tests from two sources to discredit the other test, that's known of...

I've never seen any test results done on the 3100 mAh Efest. What test are you talking about? There have been allusions to a test, but I have not seen it. You need to realize I am calling for critical thinking and evidence, not attacking your standpoint. I agree with you that the 3100mAh is not capable of continuous 20A discharge and have from the beginning. I simply would like some evidence that supports a claim like the battery is only capable of 4-6 amps continuous. Is that ridiculous? It shouldn't be. And when you say one does not get 20 amps from the battery, that is false. It has never been about whether it can produce 20 amps. It most assuredly can. It's about whether it can continuously discharge 20A safely. Which is assuredly cannot. I am asking for people to start backing their claims up, rather than spouting out claims we see made on the Internet. Just because we think it might be true does not mean we can start informing people of our hypotheses as if they were solid fact.
 

windxrunner

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 23, 2014
438
219
Portland, OR
I see it differently. I see Efest getting caught in a lie and then forced to drag a foot in the dirt and say, "Shucks, we got caught stretching the truth."

If they admit that their battery is 20 amps, then why advertise right on the battery that its 35? :blink: If it wasn't for Dampfukkus, no one would have known the truth about these batteries.

I agree that it is misleading, but nobody seems to see it the same way I do. It's misleading, yes, but not an outright lie. They don't specify continuous or pulse. It just says 20A or 35A on those two batteries. They are taking advantage of the fact that the continuous rating is the industry standard and since they properly list the continuous rating on some Efest batteries, most people are going to assume that the 3100 mAh is 20A continuous and the 2500 mAh is 35A continuous. But they never said that was the continuous rating. They simply list "max discharge" and we assumed it was continuous. So wrong, yes. Dangerous, yes. But an outright lie? No. I am NOT defending Efest I'm offering an alternate view on the matter because I find it interesting.
 

pnyc

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2014
146
121
xXx
Not a good excuse for false representation.

"Declaration of Efest IMR18650 3100mah battery

To all Efest customers:

We had heard about the testing report about the purple Efest IMR 18650 3100mAh
battery one week ago. Here we reply some common questions as below:

1. We tested the pulse discharging current of the purple Efest IMR 18650 3100mAh
battery is 20A(its continuous discharging current is 10A, higher capacity limits less
discharging current), so we mark " discharging current" is 20A."
 

suspectK

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2013
4,573
2,893
Alabummer
Ok...so they don't have to clarify pulse or continuous ratings... cool..they are re wrapped for vapers, and vaping is a pulse function, but keep in mind different cells have ranging necessary cool down and operating times with getting into the pulse rating(s).

A chart is good enough for me... show me another chart.

I'm a NETA2 technician, not on salary..just saying..so yeah;)..
 

anumber1

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2014
948
709
NW Ohio
I've never seen any test results done on the 3100 mAh Efest. What test are you talking about? There have been allusions to a test, but I have not seen it. You need to realize I am calling for critical thinking and evidence, not attacking your standpoint. I agree with you that the 3100mAh is not capable of continuous 20A discharge and have from the beginning. I simply would like some evidence that supports a claim like the battery is only capable of 4-6 amps continuous. Is that ridiculous? It shouldn't be. And when you say one does not get 20 amps from the battery, that is false. It has never been about whether it can produce 20 amps. It most assuredly can. It's about whether it can continuously discharge 20A safely. Which is assuredly cannot. I am asking for people to start backing their claims up, rather than spouting out claims we see made on the Internet. Just because we think it might be true does not mean we can start informing people of our hypotheses as if they were solid fact.


Here is a test.
AkkuDB

You can believe Efest specs. I cannot.

That battery isn't even a 10A cont battery.

Edit:
I would rather trust this "some Dude" than a Chinese marketing company that consistently overstates the ratings of the batteries they rewrap and sell. If Efest were to choose to publish their test results, that would be different.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread