Apollo Reliant 60W - TC with TCR adjustment, including Stainless Steel support

Status
Not open for further replies.

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
30W is plenty, the Reliant isn't under powered I assure you.

45W is the same really, just takes less time to reach temperature.

There is just something about the Atomic rda that doesn't require a lot of power, I don't know if it's because of the 19mm size or low internal resistance. I do know I never need over 40 watts to give massive amounts of flavor/vapor, it's the only rda I will use.
 
Last edited:

Vic15

Full Member
Sep 28, 2015
11
5
41
LV
I found the following review useful: , by the looks of it, it's the first video review of Apollo Reliant, so hopefully it will help you as much as it has helped me. :)

I'm sure there will be plenty more video reviews about it soon, so we may see different opinions about it soon enough. Although, from what I've read and watched - it looks pretty decent.

V.
 

TlfT

Full Member
Oct 1, 2015
5
5
43
Hi Guys, I've been following this thread while considering a Reliant vs having to go for a DNA200 to get a nice TCR adjustment. I'd rather not have to use a windows program to adjust TCR, so the Reliant is out front.

I couldn't decipher why the switch to SS430 from SS304 or SS316, both of which are more heat resistant. SS430 is stated to be below oxidation up to 800f, so probably no worries. Just curious if the Reliant TCR could not go low enough for 304, 316 or 317?
 

ShowerHead

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2014
1,087
2,142
Massachusetts
SS430 contains no Nickel, that's the main reason for the switch. I tried SS304 and got almost instant irritation (Nickel 10%). I plan on retrying sooner or later but, frankly, I'm having a great experience with Titanium.
I'm of a similar mind. Ti is performing fine for me, and I have a preset for it.
Besides tinkering with new wire, what's the advantage to SS?
 

pevinsghost

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 6, 2015
331
363
St Louis, MO
Stainless steel is very resistant to chemical reaction and leeching, especially 316L and 317L, you can dry burn it, make contact coils, and anything anyone's listed as a benefit of kanthal, but there is enough tcr to do TC... barely.

That's about it.

As for the switch from 316/317 to 430, I don't know as though it's a full on "switch" as something else to try. It's got some properties that look better than other types of SS, and some not as good.
 

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
SS430 contains no Nickel, that's the main reason for the switch. I tried SS304 and got almost instant irritation (Nickel 10%). I plan on retrying sooner or later but, frankly, I'm having a great experience with Titanium.

Indeed, I use it for %0.5 nickel content. Half of one percent I can handle, I also like the resistance per mm since it falls right in the range I vape in.
 

ShowerHead

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2014
1,087
2,142
Massachusetts
Indeed, I use it for %0.5 nickel content. Half of one percent I can handle, I also like the resistance per mm since it falls right in the range I vape in.
So, Ti has a larger Ni content?
I'm wanting to learn why the switch to SS. Other than preference, which I can definitely relate to, as can my wallet!
 

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
Stainless steel is very resistant to chemical reaction and leeching, especially 316L and 317L, you can dry burn it, make contact coils, and anything anyone's listed as a benefit of kanthal, but there is enough tcr to do TC... barely.

That's about it.

As for the switch from 316/317 to 430, I don't know as though it's a full on "switch" as something else to try. It's got some properties that look better than other types of SS, and some not as good.

I'm pretty sure 317 and 316 has too low a TCR value to be TC capable on anything except maybe the DNA200.

The reasons why I use 430 in order of importance.

1. Nickel content is only a trace.
2. I can use the same atomizer/build on standard wattage or temperature control modes.
3. I can dry burn without issue.
4. The resistance perfectly matches my preferred building style. Twisted 8/7 around 2.4mm mandrel is 0.45 ohms, perfect. Same setup with single strand is 0.72 ohms (just right for kayfun on mech).

Pretty much the perfect wire for me, I just got lucky that 28g fit my needs.
 

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
So, Ti has a larger Ni content?
I'm wanting to learn why the switch to SS. Other than preference, which I can definitely relate to, as can my wallet!

No nickel in grade 1 titanium (not sure about other grades.

Not being able to easily and safely dry burn titanium, the price, and can't safely use on mechs and wattage devices is the only issues I have with Ti.

Don't switch if your happy with Ti, I'm not here to change anyone's mind ;)
 

ShowerHead

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2014
1,087
2,142
Massachusetts
No nickel in grade 1 titanium (not sure about other grades.
No being able to easily and safely dry burn titanium and the price is the only issues I have with Ti.
Don't switch if your happy with Ti, I'm not here to change anyone's mind ;)

The last 3 reasons on your other post are sufficient for me. I have a non-TC mod that is languishing and SS coils would give it a chance to be used. I prefer to coil one type, and currently that is Ti for TC use. Sounds like SS would allow me to have one coil to rule them all!
Now to find out if SS is workable with a Ti setting as my other mods do not have the ability to change the TCR.

Thanks.
 

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
The last 3 reasons on your other post are sufficient for me. I have a non-TC mod that is languishing and SS coils would give it a chance to be used. I prefer to coil one type, and currently that is Ti for TC use. Sounds like SS would allow me to have one coil to rule them all!
Now to find out if SS is workable with a Ti setting as my other mods do not have the ability to change the TCR.

Thanks.

I won a Cloupor TC and until I have it I won't know if 430 can be used in Ti mode.

I sent a few feet to cigatron who has an Evic VT, hopefully he has gotten it by now and will let us know soon. It was in a regular envelope so I hope it didn't get mangled.
 

ShowerHead

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2014
1,087
2,142
Massachusetts
I won a Cloupor TC and until I have it I won't know if 430 can be used in Ti mode.

I sent a few feet to cigatron with a Evic VT, hopefully he has gotten it by now and will let us know soon. It was in a regular envelope so I hope it didn't get mangled.
I'll stay tuned. I'd like to get a SS ready MOD, but except for the DNA200, none sound like a good match for SS, especially the 430. May as well use something I own if that's the case.
 

Landman

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 10, 2015
344
679
Central AR
I won a Cloupor TC and until I have it I won't know if 430 can be used in Ti mode.

I sent a few feet to cigatron who has an Evic VT, hopefully he has gotten it by now and will let us know soon. It was in a regular envelope so I hope it didn't get mangled.
I swapped tanks yesterday, from a Ti build to a SS430 build, and forgot to change profiles (DNA200).

I'm always in the mid 20's on watts but the Ti was set to 480 on temp and I couldn't figure out why the hell it was only hitting 230 on the temp as it seemed to be vaping ok. It then hit me what I'd forgot to do! While it vaped 'ok' I could tell something wasn't right. It wasn't bad though.
 

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
I'll stay tuned. I'd like to get a SS ready MOD, but except for the DNA200, none sound like a good match for SS, especially the 430. May as well use something I own if that's the case.

Stay tuned.

430 definitely works well with the Reliant, the twisted build I'm running is pretty flawless. I do get tired of the Reliant asking the new atomizer question after an hour or so of sitting idle, they could have implemented this feature differently. I want the ability to turn it off, it isn't needed often enough to warrant it being on all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShowerHead
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread