I've been kicking around the idea of just how to post about this since reading Spiceman's post but was concerned about how it would be accepted or what it wold sound like.
These are objectives with tightening #9 screw
1s.The square flat surfaces of #3 & #8 .... solidly together, this is the ground path of the coil.
2nd. The #9 screw is locked tight so it doesn't back out with use.
3rd. The juice control moves freely.
So if #9 screw bottoms in it's threaded hole then parts #3 & #9 are not solidly butted together. the longer bottomed out #9 would be like if you just tighten #9 just enough to still let the juice control have free movement but with out wanting to back out during use.
Short story: #3 & #9 should be solidly together before #9 bottoms in it's hole.
Thinning #7 would be the first route I would go.
I agree with Dwcraig here as well. In my particular case, I noticed that #9 wasn't sized right when compared to my working Kayfun. When the new #9 came it, it matched in size with my good one, so it was an easy swap for my case. To be honest, I thought I would spend $2 on a #9 before I screwed up the #7 by thinning. This is solely based on my perceived inability to thin #7 successfully as I am kind of a klutz sometimes

I actually did what you say here. At first I kept #9 just loose tight enough to hold everything together and loose enough so the JC would still move. I did it this way until the new #9 came in.
Thanks for the information. You have contributed a lot to this thread and I always appreciate any comments that you have. We are all in this together

Last edited: