Big FDA Annoucemnent today making news !!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kanza

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2011
1,008
811
Wilmette, IL
I already use flavorings when I want to "up" the taste of some of my milder vapes so that's no problem since the best ones are sold as cake/cookie/candy supplies and they can't regulate/tax those as e-cig components. Can you imagine all the bakers having a screaming fit because their LorAnn products are now double or triple the price?
 

Who_Wants_To_Know

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 15, 2011
691
116
44
Pittsburgh, PA
I am fine with paying taxes on e-cigs, if that's what it really take to keep big greedment happy. I just don't want to see flavors being forced into diy or eliminated totally. There are a lot of good people who make their living off of juice flavors. So many companies would be hurt by this. I don't want to see that.

The wow nuport is the only flavor I vape from V4L that might be safe if they try and limit the flavoring to ones that taste like cigarettes. If they even allow that given menthol's current bind. I love a lot of V4L flavors, but it would really limit my options. Even I can only buy so many batteries.
 

Traver

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 28, 2010
1,822
662
WV
True. But you have no idea what a klutz I am.

All my high school chemistry labs failed to work "properly.":(:laugh:

If I tried vaping DIY, I could really hurt myself . . . or even the neighbors!:facepalm:

There are different levels of DIY. You can buy something like 30 ml of 30pg/70vg at 24 mg of nicotine and a bottle of flavor. Then add 30 or 40 drops of flavor to your juice and shake. How hard is that?

If the FDA bans flavored juice all of these companies that sell ready to go juice will just sell the juice and their flavors in separate bottles. They will make it easy to do.
 

Maxwell_Edison

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 5, 2009
1,655
237
Ohio
beatlesnumber9.com
My hunch is e-cigs will be put in a smokeless tobacco type class of their own. We just won't know much because I don't think anything will change regulation wise for a couple years. I hope they don't classify them as a cigarette, I'm hoping they don't and trying to be optimistic they can't do it. That the FDA will try to make money from them is a no-brainer though. Just how much they'll mess with it is completely unknown right now.
 

Joyce

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 7, 2010
1,543
333
West Virginia
I don't understand either--Regulate like a tobacco product? No relationship between e cigs and tobacco products except nicotine. There is nicotine in lots of vegetables. Why not same regulation as vegetable products? I just get cold chills thinking the government is going to get involved. When they get involved it means the end of common sense, and the beginning of greedy, bureacratic b.s. Hope this drags on forever while they try to get as much money as possible from all involved in e cigs. Need to stock up before they regulate the devil out of our products.

Government regulation was inevitable. This is the lesser of the evils, because the FDA wanted to regulate as a drug, as most of you know, which would have virtually banned the product, or made it unavailable for years. While I'm sorry to see the gubmint get its grubby hands in, I'd rather have it this way than the other.
 

TheScootness

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2011
436
153
Missouri
Here's a great explanation of this from another thread:

The reason we wanted e-cigs to be classified as a tobacco product is that they will not have to go through the extreme trials and tests that would be required if they were classified as drug delivery devices. Had they been classified as drug delivery devices they would have immediately been pulled from all markets until such time as all appropriate tests and trials had been completed (which could take up to 8 years) and then those who wished to do so and could afford the extremely high fee that the FDA charges to approve new drugs, then they could have been returned to the market.

By classifying them as tobacco products, they remain on the market and the FDA will work towards appropriate regulations that will apply to them. This is one of the roles that CASAA will play in attempting to insure that the FDA regulates them appropriately. CASAA will also be important in the contacting of all parties who will eventually be involved in determining how and how much taxation will be placed on e-cigs and e-juice. There are no 100% guarantees that the powers that be will play fair, but CASAA will be on the front lines fighting for the rights of all users of smoke-free alternatives
 

EleanorR

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 9, 2011
7,619
22,002
Treasure Coast
There are different levels of DIY. You can buy something like 30 ml of 30pg/70vg at 24 mg of nicotine and a bottle of flavor. Then add 30 or 40 drops of flavor to your juice and shake. How hard is that?

If the FDA bans flavored juice all of these companies that sell ready to go juice will just sell the juice and their flavors in separate bottles. They will make it easy to do.

I hope that Big Nanny Government doesn't ban pre-made flavored e-liquids, but you're right, what you describe sounds so simple that even I could manage it.
 

Biomom

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 6, 2010
284
42
Washington, DC
If anyone is interested below is a link to the actual letter by the FDA:

Regulation of E-Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products

That might make sense to some big corporations' lawyers, but it's a farce to claim it as information for the public. Are e-cigs "grandfathered" since they were marketed "before 2007"? I wouldn't mind, but it would be helpful for us and all of the doubters if some sensible measures were taken to ensure safety, especially of products that come from China (in light of the lead paint on toys, etc). Sadly the government rarely goes for sensible or common sense.

I feel like this issue is really anyone's guess as to what will happen. It is comforting the CASAA will be at the front of the game, and the more people who use e-cigs, the better it ensures the future of something truly helpful to so many!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread