Do you perpetuate the water vapor lie?

Status
Not open for further replies.

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Blasphemy. I say it's water vapour, cures cancer and gives me the stamina of 10 tigers. Clearly this thread is the work of ANTS. I'm sure NUTZ will be along with 96 year old studies to prove it is water vapour....
I'm just trying to figure out if "NUTZ" is actually an acronym for anything, lol.
 

jp_cfc09

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 5, 2013
302
191
lost
Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? - Schripp - 2012 - Indoor Air - Wiley Online Library

http://......................./vapor-content-of-an-electronic-cigarette


after this thread it made really want to look into what chemicals are in the vapour etc and found these linking a study showing chemicals present and at what levels. are there any studys that explain what the vapour is made of that makes sense at all, such as water, pg, vg etc. I suppose it depends on the type of liquid juice used but any study of any juice would be helpful if there is one?
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
I don't feel the need to elaborate. It may as well be compared to what analogs put out.

Why compare the two? Vaping isn't smoking. I got a funky batch of PVC which burned up on the screw in my extruder last night. Compared to what that was putting out, cigarettes are harmless...
 

Giraut

Moved On
Dec 6, 2013
500
624
I'm just back from a bar, where a few friends and I went for a drink. I pulled out my e-cig and asked the owner if he minded.

"Is that one of these electronic cigarette thingies? What's in it? Tobacco?" he said, doubtful.

I fed him Glasseye's explanation instead of the water vapor thing: "No, it's the same stuff they put in fog machines in night clubs, and food flavorings."

"Does it smell? I don't want the other patrons bothered."

"No, no smell at all."

"Well it's alright then. You go right ahead."

So there you go. The fog machine line works great and I didn't lie (well, perhaps a little: I didn't mention that the law didn't allow him to let me vape inside - but we were out of sight in our little corner - and I didn't mention the nicotine in my juice, which is illegal here too.)
 

Asbestos4004

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2013
6,802
28,169
Sugar Hill, Georgia
Im surprised by everyone answers. I wont lie, I do use the water vapor line sometimes when Its just random people that I dont want to explain it to, or dont want them to concern therselfs with why im not going outside to vape (waiter at a resturant, bartender at bar, clerk at store, ect) Although I get why people might have issues with the line, I figured it would be more common among vapers. I guess I just lack the moral fiber of most :)

That's the funniest avatar ever.
 
I think if we lead/allow people to believe misinformation or partial information, we're setting ourselves up. If I say, "water-based vapor" knowing that they'll hear "water vapor", I may make my own life easier in the short term, but I do a social disservice to the rest of the world. It sets things up for headlines like "E_CIGARETTE "WATER VAPOR" FOUND TO CONTAIN PROPYLENE GLYCOL!!!"

I would love to be able to vape anywhere, anytime I choose. That would make MY life easier. But I'm not willing to buy that at the expense of the eventual effects of soft-pedaling the truth, skirting reality, sins of omission, sugar-coating, whatever you want to call it. For me, it's not enough to say, "They don't really want to know," when the truth is, "I don't want them to object to what I'm doing, so this is all I am going to tell them."

Full disclosure is what separates us from weasely corporate interests, innit?
 

Kuljit

Moved On
Jan 4, 2014
377
271
I think if we lead/allow people to believe misinformation or partial information, we're setting ourselves up. If I say, "water-based vapor" knowing that they'll hear "water vapor", I may make my own life easier in the short term, but I do a social disservice to the rest of the world. It sets things up for headlines like "E_CIGARETTE "WATER VAPOR" FOUND TO CONTAIN PROPYLENE GLYCOL!!!"

I would love to be able to vape anywhere, anytime I choose. That would make MY life easier. But I'm not willing to buy that at the expense of the eventual effects of soft-pedaling the truth, skirting reality, sins of omission, sugar-coating, whatever you want to call it. For me, it's not enough to say, "They don't really want to know," when the truth is, "I don't want them to object to what I'm doing, so this is all I am going to tell them."

Full disclosure is what separates us from weasely corporate interests, innit?

I suppose that's about right. I've never had to explain it to anyone but my parents to convince them to get a Triton kit for my sister, who is now happily vaping :) I did tell them it was pretty much water vapor, though it still has nicotine. I don't see the problem with that, even if it wasn't my parents. If someone asks exactly what it contains, I'll tell them. But if they are objecting to my vaping and equating it to smoking, I'll try to explain it to them in a very detailed manner. Listing all of the ingredients used to make the juice will likely lead to more debate that will lead nowhere because they'll still think I'm wrong for vaping. Because they're perfect.
 

Enoch777

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 6, 2013
690
817
Midwest, USA

Giraut

Moved On
Dec 6, 2013
500
624
Not to say that I'm happily and willingly leaving them ignorant of what I'm doing. I've just never met anyone that is genuinely interested in what I'm doing. It's just been viewed as a nuisance that must be stopped. I don't like arguing.

You hit the nail on the head. When I said I just mention water vapor, it's because I need to convince someone that what I'm doing is harmless in 5 seconds or less.

If I have to talk about a subject that interests me, I always remind myself that there are 3 kinds of people:

1/ Those who aren't interested in what I'm talking about: they don't want the details, much less a complete lecture on the subject. I imagine they too have areas of expertise I wouldn't be interested in either, and I know I wouldn't want to get stuck listening to them rambling on about their particular hobby. So I return the favor and use the shortest shortcut possible to talk about what I need to talk about.

2/ Those who share an interest in the subject: they don't need explanations.

3/ Those who turn out to be interested by the subject after I mention it briefly: they will ask for more details themselves.

So there is a need for a simplistic and terse summary to bring up the subject of vaping to people in the first group, who don't particularly want to hear about it in the first place, that instantly conveys the positive aspect of the activity.

FWIW, I've only met 3 people who genuinely seemed interested in knowing more about vaping - and only one of these 3 started vaping as a direct result of my explanations. All 3 were heavy smokers thinking seriously about quitting. But I've never come across a non-smoker who wanted to know anything more than whether or not I was going to poison them with my "smoke".
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
This has already been said, but it bears repeating...

For anyone looking for a short but accurate explanation of what we exhale...
You can just say we exhale the same thing that fog machines produce, except it is flavored.

I wouldn't even bother mentioning the nicotine, as studies show the amount we exhale is negligible.
 

turnforward

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2010
260
229
San Diego
I think if we lead/allow people to believe misinformation or partial information, we're setting ourselves up. If I say, "water-based vapor" knowing that they'll hear "water vapor", I may make my own life easier in the short term, but I do a social disservice to the rest of the world. It sets things up for headlines like "E_CIGARETTE "WATER VAPOR" FOUND TO CONTAIN PROPYLENE GLYCOL!!!"

I would love to be able to vape anywhere, anytime I choose. That would make MY life easier. But I'm not willing to buy that at the expense of the eventual effects of soft-pedaling the truth, skirting reality, sins of omission, sugar-coating, whatever you want to call it. For me, it's not enough to say, "They don't really want to know," when the truth is, "I don't want them to object to what I'm doing, so this is all I am going to tell them."

Full disclosure is what separates us from weasely corporate interests, innit?

So, when someone asks you what you are drinking, from what you just said, you would feel guilty if you told them: "It's just soda."? Because you would be misleading them by not telling them that you are really drinking soda-water with caffeine and a prune based syrup called Dr. Pepper with a ton of sugar and/or Aspartame?
 

RoseB

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 3, 2012
1,832
3,369
Washington
This has already been said, but it bears repeating...

For anyone looking for a short but accurate explanation of what we exhale...
You can just say we exhale the same thing that fog machines produce, except it is flavored.

I wouldn't even bother mentioning the nicotine, as studies show the amount we exhale is negligible.

That's how I explain it. It's a mini fog machine. Except at 5.0+ volts. Then it's a portable fog machine :vapor:
 

Ohms Lawbreaker

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 18, 2014
613
1,865
Right Behind You
I tell them, "It's the new iPhone Subvocalizer with Metaphasic ESP technology, and that cloud you see is residual ectoplasma. Shiny, huh? Would you like to see my matching tin foil hat?"

No I don't and never would say that but I'd like to sometimes just so people would leave me the hell alone.

Seriously I don't engage people about it, rather just walk away. Lecturing detracts from my enjoyment of the moment. Too lazy for teaching and too smart for preaching. Love complaining like everybody else though.
 

mountainbikermark

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 13, 2014
833
2,030
central Virginia
I saw a guest on Jay Leno pull out get Blu one time. The reaction Jay showed looked like she had on a shirt that said "I've got ebola and I'm looking to share it" then went on to say it was illegal to smoke indoors in California. She took the rest of her segment explaining what a Blu (or any other e cig) is, the difference between smoke and vapor, what she was exhaling, etc. Jay became very interested and was asking a bunch of questions when she said it helped her quit smoking.
I didn't think it'd be such a big deal at the time because anything vaping was just a fringe thing and not available in your local Walgreen or tobacco shop yet. It was informative for me personally.
They never did discuss her new movie/CD/whatever, just e cigs and cigarettes.

Support Our Troops!!!
<><
s pen aholic in Beast Mode (Notetoo)
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
I saw a guest on Jay Leno pull out get Blu one time. The reaction Jay showed looked like she had on a shirt that said "I've got ebola and I'm looking to share it" then went on to say it was illegal to smoke indoors in California. She took the rest of her segment explaining what a Blu (or any other e cig) is, the difference between smoke and vapor, what she was exhaling, etc. Jay became very interested and was asking a bunch of questions when she said it helped her quit smoking.
I didn't think it'd be such a big deal at the time because anything vaping was just a fringe thing and not available in your local Walgreen or tobacco shop yet. It was informative for me personally.
They never did discuss her new movie/CD/whatever, just e cigs and cigarettes.
Are you sure that wasn't Katherine Heigl on the David Letterman show?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread