Eleaf Istick

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stosh

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 2, 2010
8,921
16,789
74
Nevada
I disagree. Voltage in RMS (for a PWM supply) more closely approximates what voltage one would get from using a true DC source. Voltage in average (from a PWM supply) does not, unless at an extremly short "off" percentage of the duty cycle.

I am not the only one burning liquids at the lowest setting of 3 volts indicated using 50/50 and Kanger factory single coils. The same setup works great on all my other 3.7 volt batteries.

So a mod calibrated in unicorn toots would be a huge fail, there would be no way to determine how many unicorn toots would suit your topper, or juice flavor? The wave form of the output has much more effect on the coil temp than the units used, a square wave, vs a saw-tooth or triangle waveform would be a big difference.

The original "3.4 volt" Joyetech 650 mah batteries used a sawtoot waveform, and were reported to hit as hard as a 3.7 volt Rive when they were introduced as a clone.
 

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
Okay, here is my honest opinion. Please note that I have 2 isticks, love them and am considering buying a third. That said, I personally can not use any of my single kanger coils on this device. I don't rebuild my kanger coils, and I get a burnt taste on all of my stock single coils (even my 2.5s). I had a PT2 with a single coil and air flow controller, even full open it burnt.

That said, the dual coils work great, I'm using a 1.8 now on a genitank and love it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thanks Pokemom. One quick question on your experience. What ratio juice do you use , or does that seem to matter? I am discouraged that even the 2.5 ohm single coils aren't working for you. That would really limit my viable uses for this device.
 

Tech Junkie

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 23, 2014
83
155
Cloud of Vape, USA
OK.

I'm asking for people's experiences with the Istick on the following setups, because this is what I have:

Kanger manufactured single coils at 1.8 and 2.2 ohms
Kanger manufactured dual coils at 1.5 and 1.8 ohms

Please chime in with specific experiences on those. Just right, too hot, for your taste? Actual burned juice or coil? Wicking couldn't keep up and you had to modify the atty?

I have a Protank mini 3 and Kanger Glass which take the dual coils and several EVOD tanks which take the single coils. I cannot use the 1.5Ω dual coils without getting burnt taste. The 1.8Ω dual coils actually test out to 2.0Ω and work fine for me with 70/30 juice. On the single coils I moved from 1.8Ω to 2.2Ω coils and they are working great with no burnt taste. I have also used 60/40 juice with no problems in one of my standard EVOD tanks.

There are several factors to whether or not it will work well such as juice ratio, tank used and so on. I have been very satisfied with my setup running the istick on 4 to 6 Watts depending on the tank and coil. I try to keep it around 3.0 to 3.1 Volts. It is working well for me with no more burnt juice or coils in my setup!
 
Last edited:

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
Happy to announce I finally got off the fence and just placed an order with VapeNW. Good Lord. I spent more time agonizing over this decision than I did with my last vehicle purchase... which was a much larger ticket item I assure you. I'll be making payments on the car for at least 4 years.

Sometimes I wonder what in the heck is wrong with me :) Guess I treat my nicotine addiction with a lot more concern that what is hurling me down the interstate at 75 mph. But, I did get to test drive the car....hmm.
 

aznnp77

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 29, 2014
728
840
Virginia
I expect the activity in this thread to die down now that we have some tangible numbers to go by. That's what I was really looking for.

I usually fire my single coils at 3.8 volts, so 4.0 volts isn't too bad. If anything, it lightens up my pocket because I always carry 2 batteries.

Obviously, the 4-5 great benefits are far outweighing the 1 overwhelming negative of the product. That's why I haven't read one person say they are returning their's.

When and if they fix the voltage issue and possibly add an adjustable center pin, this will be the perfect mod, and probably knock egos out as being the industry standard. Egos will always have their place though, as it's a cig-alike form factor for noobies.

Very, very close to being a "game changer."
 

SS stingray

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 2, 2014
400
532
Port Charlotte. Florida
Okay, here is my honest opinion. Please note that I have 2 isticks, love them and am considering buying a third. That said, I personally can not use any of my single kanger coils on this device. I don't rebuild my kanger coils, and I get a burnt taste on all of my stock single coils (even my 2.5s). I had a PT2 with a single coil and air flow controller, even full open it burnt.

That said, the dual coils work great, I'm using a 1.8 now on a genitank and love it.





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I haven't had a problem until today. I use only Kanger PT 2 . I rebuild all my coils and they come in around 1.7 to 2.2 ohms. Have had No burnt taste at 3.0 volts.
 

pokemom

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 24, 2014
2,087
9,739
Lauderhill, Florida, United States
Thanks Pokemom. One quick question on your experience. What ratio juice do you use , or does that seem to matter? I am discouraged that even the 2.5 ohm single coils aren't working for you. That would really limit my viable uses for this device.

I use either 60/40 or 50/50 pg/vg juices.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

pcrdude

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 20, 2013
914
1,740
So a mod calibrated in unicorn toots would be a huge fail, there would be no way to determine how many unicorn toots would suit your topper, or juice flavor? The wave form of the output has much more effect on the coil temp than the units used, a square wave, vs a saw-tooth or triangle waveform would be a big difference.

The original "3.4 volt" Joyetech 650 mah batteries used a sawtoot waveform, and were reported to hit as hard as a 3.7 volt Rive when they were introduced as a clone.

I suspect the Vrms value of the Joyetech batteries to which you refer were higher than 3.4 volt.

You can believe what you want, but Vrms values more accurately approximates DC voltage levels. I wanted a mod that could supply 3.7 volts, and I didn't get it in the iStick. Did I make do? Yep.
 

Fergie

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2013
965
808
Toronto, Canada,
Saw this earlier today Beyond Vape Solara DNA 30 [bv-sol-dna-30] - $175.00 : Beyond Vape, Electronic Cigarettes, Premium Vaporizers, Premium Vaping Products
Similar in shape.
image__67948.1413286190.1280.1280.jpg
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,633
1
84,773
So-Cal
OK... Got a Chance to Watch Phil's Review. Didn't see much that I Didn't Expect or Anything that hadn't been Deduced here in this Thread Already.

But I did see 2 Things that I Really Liked.

The First being that Phil Talked about Advocacy and People getting Active/Informed at an event he Recently went to.

The Second was his Reply to Someone who is Currently using an iStick and Asked him to Review it and tell them if it was
Good Or Not.

4:10 in Vid.

"
Q. Are you Using it?
A. Yes

Q. Are you Happy?
A. Yes

Q. Are you Smoking?
A. No

Then there is Nothing Wrong with it."


These 3 Question Should be the Ultimate Benchmark to whether or not a APV is Good for an Individual.

---

What I did think was Funny about the Video was at 17:20. That was when Phil tries to Remove the Guts of the iStick by Cutting the Connector Wires and then Pushing the Battery and Board out the Bottom End. Cutting his Fingers and Breaking the Button Actuators on the Board in the Process.

Phil, Phil, Phil. You haven't been Reading my Warning on how to take an iStick Apart.

Remove the Smoked Strip over the Buttons. Remove the Buttons. Then push the Battery/Board out the Top End. And La Vola. You know have an Intact iStick Guts.

LOL
 

KODIAK (TM)

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 31, 2014
1,898
4,983
Dead Moose, AK
RMS is a simple mathematical formula designed to be able to compare apples and oranges for an electrical engineer.
It is no more valid as a vaping measurement than calibrations in unicorn toots.
You're right. It's all academic. But what you're missing is the rest of the PV world "speaks" RMS and now comes the lone iStick using a different calibration. It would just make more sense if every topper fired the same on every mod at the same settings.
 

scaredmice

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 23, 2014
220
660
Valencia, Spain
So if I have two mech mods, same model and one hits harder it's a "huge failure"?

RMS is a simple mathematical formula designed to be able to compare apples and oranges for an electrical engineer.
It is no more valid as a vaping measurement than calibrations in unicorn toots.

If a version 2 doesn't hit as hard, and have possibly a higher wattage capability, it would be a huge failure, regardless of calibration.

Forget statistics, RMS, averages, and the unicorn toots (whatever they are, BTW, remember, I'm not a native English speaker...).

If an electronic appliance says it is giving 10 watts of output, I can expect something in the range of 8,5 to 11,5 W as actual output. And that being frankly open-minded.

But if it is not, and it is going adrift even in the smaller ranges, and giving me 40 % to 90 % more...... and burning thing in the middle....

I do not know you guys, but here we've got stringent regulations against that kind of failures. Of course, I'll be the last to point out iSmoka to anyone about this, but they should learn the lesson, and quickly, because it is about time and a V2 with the same failure won't be tolerated.

And for the record, I'm the guy who seriously considered returning the iStick. Only the lack of proper wholeseller channels for the company which sold it to me, and trying to avoid a case of wrong culprits, led me away of that decision. In the meantime, I'm seriously considering to sell it, so if anyone is getting desperate about it and the empty shelves thing...... it's black, it has got the eLeaf adaptor, it has been charged from empty four times so far, it's been used with an AFC ring adaptor to protect the 510..... and it is located inside the EU...... guess your numbers at about half the purchasing price....:)
 
Last edited:

armadillo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2010
600
844
Honolulu
You're right. It's all academic. But what you're missing is the rest of the PV world "speaks" RMS and now comes the lone iStick using a different calibration. It would just make more sense if every topper fired the same on every mod at the same settings.

Agreeing with both of your points. Now, to help folks adjust, can someone make a table that translates the equivalents of Avg vs RMS so people can dial in their favorite settings they know from the usual RMS mods?
 

KODIAK (TM)

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 31, 2014
1,898
4,983
Dead Moose, AK
Agreeing with both of your points. Now, to help folks adjust, can someone make a table that translates the equivalents of Avg vs RMS so people can dial in their favorite settings they know from the usual RMS mods?
For starters, just back down about one volt when on the iStick. The higher you go the less you notice the variance. i.e., if you already vape in the higher wattage realm just adjust to suit - it will vape just the same as any other device.

Seriously. Put a piece of tape on the display, keep tasting until it hits just right then leave it alone. :D The iStick reminds me of my early flying days. Too much reliance on instrumentation makes for a less than enjoyable flight at times. :)
 

scaredmice

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 23, 2014
220
660
Valencia, Spain
Agreeing with both of your points. Now, to help folks adjust, can someone make a table that translates the equivalents of Avg vs RMS so people can dial in their favorite settings they know from the usual RMS mods?

Someone did that an few zillion posts ago......:laugh:

It was calculated supposing, as in that moment it seemed so, that the peak voltage of the iStick was 5,8 V. It turns out that it is more in between 5,65 through 5,78, and it might change a bit depending on the load and wattages requested, but, anyway, I've updated my maths with those new numbers (i.e., now at 5,73 V as 'mean peak voltage') and....


...Oh! Did I tell you I was going to get 'full ahead academic flank mode on'?......:laugh:

O.K., let's do it simple. If you plot requested voltage (i.e. average for the iStick) and actual voltage (i.e. RMS, as any other modern APV 'talks') you'll find something like this:

avevsrms.png


And if you plot, for several resistences, power shown on the display (being that a result of its internal calculations for a requested voltage in VV mode, or an user's setting in VW mode) versus actual power output:

power2power.png


I hope it may help someone lost, but the best recommendation still is to go up from 3,0 V and in that way just find the 'sweet spot'.

Nobody has actually adressed the 'more than 20 watts' issue. That's what you'll find doing the maths (near 25 W at 1,0 Ω), but I wonder if there is some limitation mechanism to avoid that kind of overrated power, like throwing out the PWM pulse with less peak voltage. It seems that for high wattages the actual peak voltage is less than 5,7 V, as a result of some instability of the squared waveform. PBusardo did shown a hint of it, but in his video there is not enough time to get a full feeling about that. Anyway, being 20 o 20-something, near the maximum voltage the PWM-gate is less notorious.....
 

aznnp77

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 29, 2014
728
840
Virginia
Agreeing with both of your points. Now, to help folks adjust, can someone make a table that translates the equivalents of Avg vs RMS so people can dial in their favorite settings they know from the usual RMS mods?

i believe Phil did that in his video on the graphs. 2.1 ohms was a full volt difference. If you go up higher in voltage I think it was closer to .7 volts difference. Once it reaches it's full 5.5 volts, it's pretty accurate. Check the video out again.

Sorry, my internet is kinda choppy at work. But it looked like.....

3.0 volts = 4.0 volts
4.0 volts = ~4.7 volts
5.0 volts = ~5.2 volts
5.5 volts = ~5.6 volts

Based on Pbusardo's chart, but the guy above me has a chart of what it should be in conversion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread