Not to even get into the are/were debate, but...
Are the two questions "Are you a smoker," and "do you know a smoker," meant to be mutually exclusionary? As in, you EITHER are a smoker, OR you know one? Because I think most people who ARE a smoker, probably KNOW at least one other smoker.
Amd for that matter, realistically, even if one is not a smoker, how likely is it that you don't even KNOW a smoker? Really? And how would you even know that for sure? Is it a useful question?
Similarly the pair of questions "I have purchased an e-cig," and "I would purchase an e-cig." I checked both. I think most of us here who have, would.
Really, I checked almost all but a couple of those. If the poll questions are soo loosely defined that people can check nearly all, it's not going to gather very good or useful data.
Are the two questions "Are you a smoker," and "do you know a smoker," meant to be mutually exclusionary? As in, you EITHER are a smoker, OR you know one? Because I think most people who ARE a smoker, probably KNOW at least one other smoker.
Amd for that matter, realistically, even if one is not a smoker, how likely is it that you don't even KNOW a smoker? Really? And how would you even know that for sure? Is it a useful question?
Similarly the pair of questions "I have purchased an e-cig," and "I would purchase an e-cig." I checked both. I think most of us here who have, would.
Really, I checked almost all but a couple of those. If the poll questions are soo loosely defined that people can check nearly all, it's not going to gather very good or useful data.