Hi Odell, I had pretty much the exact same experience as you. Once I got the first smooth tasty draw from a 510, I knew I was done with analogs. Wouldn't it be nice if you could help a friend do the same. As much as I would like to, I don't even consider it since I'm too afraid a non-DIY friend would end up wishing I had never mentioned the stuff to them. And if they got ripped off I would really feel bad. So I'm just wondering if we are being smart consumers or are we maybe not holding the suppliers to high enough standards. Several seem to be taking sides with the suppliers which makes me wonder if they are suppliers or affiliated with suppliers. Of course some just seem to want to remain blissfully oblivious as long as their PV is making clouds
Your right, it is fascinating.
I don't know if your feelin' me ebutts.
Your disappointment seems to lie with what you think is a lack of quality (either incidental or deliberate). The rub is I don't think the underlying technology has evolved enough to assume there are standards to be met. I realize that the basic premise of vaporizing a liquid isn't all that sophisticated. But to develop a delivery system that provides an efficient alternative to analogs and at the same time comes in at a price point that makes it readily available to consumers looking to quit cigarettes may not be as obviously simple as one may initially presume.
When a friend asks me, "what should I use?" I show him an eGo setup with a tank. It's easy, gives a ton of vapor, inexpensive in comparison to a carton of analogs, and its accessible to a person just starting out. I use a Saber Touch variable voltage mod. I wouldn't expect a person new to vaping to get their head around an ST or the concept of variable voltage nor would I anticipate a successful outcome for them.
Now. is the eGo a perfect system? I don't think so, but if it serves the initial purpose of getting my friend off analogs then perfection is really not the issue is it? Since I first introduced my friend mentioned above to the eGo, I have offered to show him other aspects of vaping. He politely (sometimes not so much) declines any further experimentation into other forms of vaping saying that he's happy with the equipment he uses.
I, on the other hand, am a "first adopter" type of consumer and therefore expect that not all the purchases I make in this market are going to pan out. Again, do I feel that it didn't pan out from a lack of quality? No, I think it didn't pan out because what looked like a great idea wasn't evolved enough to produce the results I would have liked. But being a first adopter I run that risk and I do so knowing that this may entail my spending some money on what may not be the best solution to the issue that product was trying to resolve.
As far as the contributors to this thread "taking sides with the suppliers" I am not certain I understand that conclusion. If we believe that a supplier is supplying product that we want to try, then don't we as consumers bear some responsibility in choosing whether we want to risk our cash? We have a choice to spend our money on a new innovation or purchase something that has proven itself to be satisfactory (
note not perfect) and has been on the market long enough to prove its efficacy.
I get angry when something that I purchased doesn't perform the way I thought it would, but I also purchased that product knowing that it is cutting edge, freshly off of an engineers drawing board and that the first few iterations of that product simply may not work the way I wanted. I'll still purchase that product on the chance that it may work right off the bat, but I'm reluctant to look for less than honorable intentions from a supplier if it doesn't.
I don't believe I am blissfully oblivious, simply realistic.