I already ordered a box anyway.....but now I'm really excited!!!
Is that a vertical coil with hemp in the rest of the bed in the fogger?
yep, 1.3 ohm 28g....the video was at 10 watts, I am vaping it at 14 watts.

I already ordered a box anyway.....but now I'm really excited!!!
Is that a vertical coil with hemp in the rest of the bed in the fogger?
What's your favorite setup so far with the new hemp?
Only have 4 set up. Fogger, Rocket, RSST, and an IGO=L, all are working great but if I had to choose it is a toss up between the first two. IMO Their small chimney gives a better vape than others with large caps. Looking forward to a Russian I have coming.
BJ, how often do you anticipate needing to change out the hemp?
That's the one thing I love about ceramic and hate about cotton.
Cyrus, it is as moldable as cotton. I agree with you these vertical coils with all the air going thru them are unbelievable.![]()
BJ, how often do you anticipate needing to change out the hemp?
That's the one thing I love about ceramic and hate about cotton.
BJ, is this how it's done for virtical micro coil setup for EVOD/VAPEONLY/PROTANK head?
View attachment 263709
I've tried above and the other way around too on my vapeonly head, but I'm keep getting short and can't figure it out.
The RSST with a hemp wick and a 28g nano open end, slanted with the hemp wrapped around the outside of the coil works as good, even little better than a regular Ao setup.
So I unwrapped my Russian after about 30mls and man that wick had some major GUNK on the inside (outer diameter of coil). But no burning, as it pretty much washed off.
Unfortunately when I pulsed the coil I noticed it wasn't glowing inside out and evenly anymore, hello hot spots. The coil bought the farm after a little adjusting and pulsing and didn't have much success setting up another one lol. Its much more difficult for me to set up tight, even micros like this vs. a horizontal coil, less room to pulse and squeeze. I'm getting coil deformation from the take off of the legs, I need to figure out how to do this in a way that isn't so labor intensive, because going back to horizontals isn't an option![]()