Although these statistics were relevant 40 years ago when i was studying the subject I see no reasonNow there is some hard credible data[emoji12]
they would not be statistically equivalent today. I smoked for 38 years straight not counting my on again
off again habit when i was a teenager. Obviously I was very dependent on smoking. That does not mean
every one who smokes becomes dependent on smoking. I am trying to give some context as to nicotine and,
dependence in a broader scope. Looking at the problem from a personal point of view is necessary but, one
must look at the whole picture to gain any perspective as to how it relates to the real world as a whole.
I am not saying nor, have ever said smoking is not or,can not be highly addictive. It certainly was for me.
Those of us that had the misfortune to be in the small percentage of smokers that became highly dependent
on smoking shouldn't look at the world only through our own eyes and experiences.
This is what the 1964 Surgeon Generals report on smoking had to say concerning nicotine.
"The habitual use of tobacco is related primarily to psychological and social drives, reinforced and perpetuated by the pharmacological actions of nicotine. Social stimulation appears to play a major role in a young person’s early and first experiments with smoking. No scientific evidence supports the popular hypothesis that smoking among adolescents is an expression rebellion against authority. Individual stress appears to be associated more with fluctuations in the amount of smoking than with the prevalence of smoking. The overwhelming evidence indicates that smoking-its beginning, habituation, and occasional discontinuation-is to a very large extent psychologically and socially determined. Nicotine is rapidly changed in the body to relatively inactive substances with low toxicity. The chronic toxicity of small doses of nicotine is low in experimental animals. These two facts, when taken in conjunction with the low mortality ratios of pipe and cigar smokers, indicate that the chronic toxicity of nicotine in quantities absorbed from smoking and other methods of tobacco use is very low and probably does not represent an important health hazard."
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/nnbbmq.pdf
Compare this to what you here about nicotine today in the mass media and from anti-vaping
opponents.

Regards
mike