Link to webcast of Dec. 17 FDA Public Hearing on NRT & Innovative Products

Status
Not open for further replies.

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Who's this Nicorette guy and who is he to tell me I should strive to eliminate nicotine from my life?
And there is the gorilla in the room as the different interests between e-cig users and the ANTZ/BP. BP has no real motivation to get smokers to really quit - they make more money keeping smokers on the quit/relapse cycle and then getting sick from smoking-related diseases for which they have the "treatments."
 

elfstone

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2012
2,601
3,018
OH
Yep, a rep for Big, Evil tobacco that always lies. lol ;)

Remember - in spite of the scientific evidence showing the opposite, tobacco companies are required by law to say that all of their smoke-free products are not a safe alternative to smoking, while Big Pharma is allowed to lie and call their products "safe and effective." :rolleyes:

Uhmmm... can I hate BT? I do. I REALLY hate them for everything they did.

But I am mature enough to recognize that their arguments in this context here are valid, well supported and indirectly support our cause as well.
 

elfstone

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2012
2,601
3,018
OH
The important points in Nicorette presentation that are good for "us":
- smokers cannot be expected to 'just quit'
- NRTs should be seen as a safe and effective 'chronic therapy' -- by the same token, use of non-tobacco nicotine products for recreation ought to be safe and effective
- NRT users are able to self-titrate dosage and avoid unreasonable high dose -- by the same token, e-cigarette users can do the same as we all know from our own experience
- NRT combinations are probably more effective than single NRT -- by the same token, recreational use of e-cigarettes cannot be considered harmful and ineffective a priori
 

elfstone

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2012
2,601
3,018
OH
Why dies the panel seem so hung up on "dual use"? What's the prob?

The correct assumption is that dual use results in too small a reduction in harm.

The incorrect assumption is use of non-tobacco nicotine / NRTs will "perpetuate" and "enhance" nicotine addiction and eventual switching is improbable
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Thanks for posting that, Kristin. I am etching now but missed the earlier parts. They are currently discussing NRT, but I haven't heard anything about PVs specifically.

E-cigs came up a few times, but the focus of this hearing is NRT.

Uhmmm... can I hate BT? I do. I REALLY hate them for everything they did.

But I am mature enough to recognize that their arguments in this context here are valid, well supported and indirectly support our cause as well.

As long as you equally hate Big Pharma and the FDA for lying to us for 30 years about safer alternatives after they called out the tobacco companies for lying. ;) The ANTZ probably have killed far more people with their lies and they are still doing it today, all while blaming it on the tobacco companies.
 

elfstone

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2012
2,601
3,018
OH
The important points in Nicorette presentation that are good for "us":
- smokers cannot be expected to 'just quit'
- NRTs should be seen as a safe and effective 'chronic therapy' -- by the same token, use of non-tobacco nicotine products for recreation ought to be safe and effective
- NRT users are able to self-titrate dosage and avoid unreasonable high dose -- by the same token, e-cigarette users can do the same as we all know from our own experience
- NRT combinations are probably more effective than single NRT -- by the same token, recreational use of e-cigarettes cannot be considered harmful and ineffective a priori


They WILL buy everything Nicorette and friends sell... And we MUST 'catch them at the pass' and force them to apply the same assumptions and inferences to e-cigarettes.
 

Lance_Wallen

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Aug 11, 2011
1,367
921
45
Fort Worth
www.steammonkey.com
A Tobacco Co. Rep trying to convince us that they care, is an absolute Joke. If they care so much, shut down the cig factories.
They only thing they care about is replacing there steadily loosing revenue...

I'll take BT selling ecigs over BT selling regular cigs any day.
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
A Tobacco Co. Rep trying to convince us that they care, is an absolute Joke. If they care so much, shut down the cig factories.
They only thing they care about is replacing there steadily loosing revenue...

Well, think about it without the personal feelings (and the lies the ANTZ have told us for so long.)

They are a business that sells a product that 46 million Americans want and demand and another million or so new U..S users want and demand every year, in spite of full knowledge of the risks. Why wouldn't they care to have their customers live longer by switching to smoke-free products? Doesn't it make sense? But until now, they've been blocked by the government from telling their customers that smoke-free tobacco is orders of magnitudes safer than smoking and their safer products are blocked by the ANTZ at every turn, so the only available tobacco products are the most deadly. Whose fault is that?
 

zippersnapper

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Mar 18, 2012
3,179
4,866
Well, think about it without the personal feelings (and the lies the ANTZ have told us for so long.)

They are a business that sells a product that 46 million Americans want and demand and another million or so new U..S users want and demand every year, in spite of full knowledge of the risks. Why wouldn't they care to have their customers live longer by switching to smoke-free products? Doesn't it make sense? But until now, they've been blocked by the government from telling their customers that smoke-free tobacco is orders of magnitudes safer than smoking and their safer products are blocked by the ANTZ at every turn, so the only available tobacco products are the most deadly. Whose fault is that?

Your so very right. Indeed, I am thinking with emotion, and not logic.
 

elfstone

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2012
2,601
3,018
OH
They keep insisting that each individual product has some magic je ne sais quoi that an identical but unapproved product doesn't have.

This is an old FDA trick - that's how they make money for BP.

They are extreme in this, you wouldn't believe: for instance, a company has mixed two old, cheap blood pressure medications in one pill and proved that it worked well for African American hypertensive patients.

The FDA approved that specific brand of dual pill and allowed it a patent and to cost hundreds of times more than the two drugs separately; and stated officially that prescribing the two separate drugs together is not effective!
 

DiNet

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 26, 2012
399
287
40
Israel
Thank you Kristin, this is much preffered way over the quality I get from live stream.

– Lorie McClung, Private Citizen
Overall, authorities should stop reminding smokers of how hard it is to quit, should treat them like adults, and should allow NRTs to succeed. The word quit should be removed from the vocabulary.
I totally agree, the "It's so hard to quit" always floats around us so it's imprinted to our brain making it so.

– Linc Williams, Private Citizen/Documentary Director
The last 10 years used around 4 packs a day.
Today I’m 28 months smoke-free.
... just amazing! Liked that one, apart from his hate for chantix (tho I have no idea wth is that, and frankly don't care).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread