Pharmacokinetic bracketing -- gotta love simple terminology 
And there is the gorilla in the room as the different interests between e-cig users and the ANTZ/BP. BP has no real motivation to get smokers to really quit - they make more money keeping smokers on the quit/relapse cycle and then getting sick from smoking-related diseases for which they have the "treatments."Who's this Nicorette guy and who is he to tell me I should strive to eliminate nicotine from my life?
Yep, a rep for Big, Evil tobacco that always lies. lol
Remember - in spite of the scientific evidence showing the opposite, tobacco companies are required by law to say that all of their smoke-free products are not a safe alternative to smoking, while Big Pharma is allowed to lie and call their products "safe and effective."![]()
Why dies the panel seem so hung up on "dual use"? What's the prob?
Thanks for posting that, Kristin. I am etching now but missed the earlier parts. They are currently discussing NRT, but I haven't heard anything about PVs specifically.
Uhmmm... can I hate BT? I do. I REALLY hate them for everything they did.
But I am mature enough to recognize that their arguments in this context here are valid, well supported and indirectly support our cause as well.
The important points in Nicorette presentation that are good for "us":
- smokers cannot be expected to 'just quit'
- NRTs should be seen as a safe and effective 'chronic therapy' -- by the same token, use of non-tobacco nicotine products for recreation ought to be safe and effective
- NRT users are able to self-titrate dosage and avoid unreasonable high dose -- by the same token, e-cigarette users can do the same as we all know from our own experience
- NRT combinations are probably more effective than single NRT -- by the same token, recreational use of e-cigarettes cannot be considered harmful and ineffective a priori
A Tobacco Co. Rep trying to convince us that they care, is an absolute Joke. If they care so much, shut down the cig factories.
They only thing they care about is replacing there steadily loosing revenue...
A Tobacco Co. Rep trying to convince us that they care, is an absolute Joke. If they care so much, shut down the cig factories.
They only thing they care about is replacing there steadily loosing revenue...
Well, think about it without the personal feelings (and the lies the ANTZ have told us for so long.)
They are a business that sells a product that 46 million Americans want and demand and another million or so new U..S users want and demand every year, in spite of full knowledge of the risks. Why wouldn't they care to have their customers live longer by switching to smoke-free products? Doesn't it make sense? But until now, they've been blocked by the government from telling their customers that smoke-free tobacco is orders of magnitudes safer than smoking and their safer products are blocked by the ANTZ at every turn, so the only available tobacco products are the most deadly. Whose fault is that?
I totally agree, the "It's so hard to quit" always floats around us so it's imprinted to our brain making it so.Overall, authorities should stop reminding smokers of how hard it is to quit, should treat them like adults, and should allow NRTs to succeed. The word quit should be removed from the vocabulary.
... just amazing! Liked that one, apart from his hate for chantix (tho I have no idea wth is that, and frankly don't care).The last 10 years used around 4 packs a day.
Today I’m 28 months smoke-free.