Interesting discussion. Thanks for the link to the hearings. Subscribing to this thread.
Rub their nose in it Bill go man go!
MY what a refreshing overview of BP's wishes and intent! What a perfect answer to nicotine...a DRUG that makes you not want a different drug(with much more chilling side effects and marginal efficacy)...(Drug-Drug)+Drug=Drug....or did I forget to carry the 1 somewhere?
In told you guys that if you thought Elaine's testimony was "confrontational" that Bill would blow it out of the water, lol!
The juvenile, smarmy and confrontational outlook as seen in Elaine's presentation this morning, utilized prevalently by CAASA representatives in ECF and (thusly) adopted by many followers has caused failure on the part of CAASA in obtaining any support from this user of electronic cigarettes.
elfstone,
I'm saying they want to push the Chantix etc. and the way I see those drugs is, hey you are addicted to nicotine, start taking this other drug and you won't be addicted anymore. They make the nicotine out to be the problem but replace it with an even bigger one all while patting themselves on the back and collecting huge dividends.
The juvenile, smarmy and confrontational outlook as seen in Elaine's presentation this morning, utilized prevalently by CAASA representatives in ECF and (thusly) adopted by many followers has caused failure on the part of CAASA in obtaining any support from this user of electronic cigarettes.
Exactly...sorry for the poorly written post. I got going a bit too fast after the nice pre-lunch BP commercial presented by their friends at the FDA had me a bit spun up.
I'm actually serious - which rep brings lunch?
Actually, I am hard pressed to find it 'confrontational'. He stated a number of facts, not even a lot of interpretation. He set the scene - this kind of facts ought to have been on the agenda already.
.