IMO a good analogy of difference between smoking and
vaping is:
1 - Do you want to drive a car? (equals smoking)
2 - Or do you want to walk through the park while using your mobile
device?
There's no long term studies on walking through the park with a mobile device, so there's no humanly way of knowing how that will affect you over the long term. Could be much worse for you than driving a car. Who knows?
Now please ignore the people that have lived to be 90 years old or more and have driven a car. All those people and anyone at any age that has driven and is still alive needs to be ignored for my primary point that cars kill people and/or can hurt them very bad.
If we can all just remember that driving kills and is one of the most deadly items on the planet, all other points are easy to make. Oh, also ignore that some people actually like to drive in a car. Please do not focus on the enjoyment factor when it comes to driving or walking through a park, as that would take away from the many aspects of harm I could talk about if you care about actual data and details.
Also realize that people who would still drive a car when they could just as well only walk thru a park with a mobile device, but choose to do both, are dual travelers, which is another way of saying they are troubled individuals. Can't quite give up driving just yet (knowing it is one of the deadliest activities on the planet) and have started walking through parks with a mobile device as well. Both are very risky activities. Lots of mobile devices explode in parks, okay maybe only about 5 so far, but who knows what the future will bring? For all we know, all devices in the future could one day explode, and then where would humanity be?
Obviously kids shouldn't be driving/riding in a car (duh) and walking through the park with a mobile devices is a huge no no for minors. Why? Because they need our protection and it's just wrong to argue otherwise. Duh. So, no go for kids doing this, as it is that risky, or we really don't know how risky it is, so why risk it?
A question arises of whether people should be allowed to walk through a park with a mobile device in public? Well, a) you can't drive through a public park using a mobile device, so there's that precedent. B) It's inherently rude to walk through a public park using a mobile device. And c) while it could be left up to private parks to make the call, it is just common
sense that if we know it is rude and risky, that really no one should be doing this in public, probably not in private as well. For sure if children are present anywhere in the park, then it is strictly off limits. Won't anyone think of the children? A fair compromise is that wherever you can drive through a public park while using a mobile device, then that is a place you are allowed to walk through with a mobile device. Not sure how anyone can argue against that.
---------
And that's about as far as I care to take the analogy for now. To me, it's a good analogy and one I find to be utterly ridiculous in how my arguments are put forth. And yet, I used almost the same (exact) rhetoric as an anti-vaper would. Imagine that.