No I wouldn't. Not if.....
this is a true statement and one you both have knowledge of.
In that case if I were the buyer I would have specifically asked the seller to try it once they got it back before sending it to me. If I were the seller I would have taken it upon myself to test the unit when it was back in my hands as I wouldn't want to send someone else a product that I knew had potential issues that may or may not have been resolved.
Don't get me wrong. As I said in my previous post I completely agree on not seeing why they couldn't have just provided you with a mech switch in the first place if they know the track record of the original switches being faulty.
But them not doing that, which is something both the buyer and seller in this transaction were aware of, does not cancel out the fact that both the condition of the unit and the validity of the warranty are things that both of you should have checked on before completing the transaction.
i think we are almost agreeing here thyestean?i think we are on the same path. Whatever the buyer and seller back and forth issues they do not cloud the facts that puresmoker sent a switch that was faulty three times...if it had not been me to find out in ireland it wouldve been the original buyer in USA who would have been sent a tact switch and had the same issue i am having today. The only difference is PS would have to provide a 4th switch in their case. They refuse to do so in mine.
I will not go on about warranties and the particular switch they sent me as these points are already covered.