But this statement is kinda questionable. It's like saying if I by a used car, Ford shouldn't have to deal with me. They should have to deal with me if the faults of the car ( or PV in this instance) are proven to be the car makers mistakes.
That is what happens in a recall. It doesn't matter if 6 people own that car before it is recalled.......if that vehicle is recalled by the auto maker for something they done wrong while building the vehicle, the auto maker has to do the repair work out of pocket for car owner#6.
Why shouldn't ANY company have to fix mistakes that THEY are responsible for. It isn't like the original owner broke it.......and it isn't like Cass broke it. What it seems like, to me, is PS put out some units that were faulty......they should be willing to fix those faulty units. There wouldn't be a debate here if PS had sold a working unit from the start......the original owner would prolly still own it if it weren't for it breaking to begin with.
i'm not sure that this argument applies in this case. in theory, yes, the supplier or manufacturer should uphold the warranty and provide the necessary service for a defective unit. the car argument goes into various federal and state laws which might lead to serious injury, and potential catastrophe on a large scale, if certain car defects were not addressed and repaired.
but this is a strange case, just from reading the original post. there are still folks out here, i'm one of them, who have perfectly functional tact switches. i have mechanical switches for backup which i ordered after threads began to pop up noting customer issues with the original tact. however, it's being used with the passthrough without any problems and again, i myself use it regularly on one of my proteges. this is not to argue that the mechanical switch isn't a better switch. it is, plain and simple. it doesn't look as good on the unit, but it's really such a simple design that can easily be taken apart and tweaked to fix whatever problems one might encounter.
there is an interesting point being brought up regarding the op, the third party reseller, and ps' obligations to either. the op isn't a ps customer, but knowing ps, that wouldn't matter one bit if she were actually in one of two countries that ps directly services. i knew, despite the wording to the contrary by the op, that ps would not receive a unit for repair from a us customer (maybe the first, maybe not), fix the unit, then send it to ireland for another customer. that doesn't make any sense, but i'm glad that's all cleared up now. on another note, ps, meaning steve and/or casey, personally check every unit to make sure they work before they ship out. sure stuff happens in transit, but let's not even allow the thought to enter our minds that ps sent out a nonfunctioning unit to begin with. i hope the op looked at threads concerning the switch before she purchased. i hope the op talked with the reseller about their experiences, i.e. why the heck are you selling it? and i hope the op looked at the product manufacturer's page to read the description of the unit (such as now shipping with mechanical switch), available options (buy a mechanical switch if your protege has a tact), and sales policies (we don't ship beyond the us and canada) before purchase. now, if everything went swimmingly there would be no problem. and yes, it is a significant purchase which no one should take lightly. that's why i feel that to spend close to a hundred bucks on any item, but particularly a used one that is no real discount on the new unit, i'd want to make sure some things are in order to justify my purchase and sustain my customer satisfaction with the product. really, a simple email prior to purchase would have handled all of this well before it turned into what it did.
apparently none of this was done, and/or the op went ahead with what information was provided and made an educated choice to purchase the product anyway. who knows, and it's a moot point now, but if lessons should be learned from this thread that has to be one of them. but no one but the reseller knows whether the unit that shipped to cass was a functioning unit to begin with. i don't even know if they are entirely at fault, unless they guaranteed a functioning unit in their classified post, but if they knew they had to send it to ps for repair, or knew they were selling a unit that ps was repairing, maybe they should have made sure a mechanical switch was part of the sale. looking at the ps website, it appears they were out of stock on the mechanical switch at some point, and didn't get new ones in until feb. 2nd. so it's possible that ps couldn't have put a mechanical switch on the unit at that time even if they wanted to, or that they couldn't send cass one (not just because no one else across the pond should even have these yet) but because they themselves were out of stock. i don't know either way, but i'm really thinking that the reseller should have had a mechanical swicth on the unit, or fully disclaimed the details of the pending service for the ps product.
for everyone here who owns the protege, or any ps device really, they should know that puresmoker will do what they can whenever they can to help keep you vaping. no one likes to hear this, but a lot of what goes wrong is user error. from my experience, ps doesn't care..."send it back and we'll take a look, bud" is the response you'll get. and even though it's among the strangest things i've heard, had the op been in a ps serviceable country, they would have likely fixed a metal unit that was sanded or filed or shaved down as well. there's three main components to the products, and more once you start adding batteries, atomizers, etc. but the reason they typically ask for you to send the unit and a battery and the atomizer you used when experiencing the problem is so they can effectively identify what the issue is and remedy it. i don't know about switch housing not fitting in the tube and needing to be shaved away and hurting hands and almost burning yourself. that's a bit much, it's really a bit much to even attempt in the first place. that's probably one of the reasons why ps only services n. america right now, they can address individual user issues, should they arise, with relative expedience.
but this post drags on, and i'm not even sure why or who cares at this point. i hope to accomplish two things by adding my half a nickel to this thread. the first is to say, sorry cass, sounds like your atomizer is screwed too tight on your adapter pushing the post down and creating a short in the switch. get a mechanical switch and usb passthrough extension cable when you can and all will be great. in the meantime, hope you enjoy your new, soon to arrive mod. but after seeing that post and then reading many of those that followed, i'd add that 2) for cass and anyone who makes a purchase, particularly from an overseas supplier or reseller, do the necessary research and ask the critical questions of those who matter (meaning those who will impact your ability to sustain a working unit), which in this case was the reseller and ps. so in this instance, cass, if you haven't done so already i'd advise you to check with that other pv's manufacturer to make sure he'll do whatever it takes now, in terms of overseas customer serviceability, so as to preempt a lament posted in that subforum as well. seriously, just helpful advice.
best of luck to everyone considering new pv purchases and reading threads like these as part of their research. ps replies to tickets and queries, before you're a customer and after, whether you're respectful towards them or not (though it always helps to be kind), and they, along with their subforum threads are a great resource among others for those considering a purchase and thinking about the longterm investment and usability of their products.
happy vaping,
buGG