New studies find carcinogens in vg and pg at high temps, even in tootle puffers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
Thinner wire is harder to keep in optimal operating ranges.

I'd say impossible (without TC). After 4 or 5 seconds, and with poor wicking and poor airflow, you're reaching temps that are clearly dangerous--as evidenced by burnt filler surrounding a heating coil.
 

Steamix

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 21, 2013
1,586
3,212
Vapistan
just a thought: Silica wicks would be the way to go? They do not burn.

Might have to get out the little bit I have from years ago....

Maybe the other way round :

Cotton and rayon burn/melt through at fairly low temps.
So they might well be the pauper's TC :D
If your cotton or rayon wick decides to quit, you're running your juice too hot.
 

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
Well here is an interesting question then.

If e-cig vapor has less benzine than air .... where did the benzine go?

Last I heard was Florida, but it will come back to the North in late April.

Maybe test in a vacuum running say pure argon instead of air. While standing on a barrel of VG.

But yeah, if it in fact is lower than plain old air there is a flaw in the test method that requires clarification. That link was not to the original study but an interpretation of it, so it might not be so clear cut on that comparison. Still, benzene is just plain not good for you.
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal

Here are all the data from the USC study, including Compounds, Outdoor air, e-Cigarette, and normal cigarette.http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/em/c4/c4em00415a/c4em00415a1.pdf

For your convenience, listed below are the amounts of Cr, Ni, Pb, Zn and Al in outdoor air vs e-cigarette vapor: ;)

Cr: 5.53 vs 4.22
Ni: 5.57 vs 6.14 (+/-2.9)
Pb: 13.28 vs 9.85
Zn: 54.31 vs 56.08 (+/- 21 [sic])
Al: 333.27 (±62.93) vs 161.43 (±71.35)

So, vapor is actually healthier, per this study, than the air we breathe here in SoCal. :lol:
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
Here are all the data from the USC study, including Compounds, Outdoor air, e-Cigarette, and normal cigarette.http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/em/c4/c4em00415a/c4em00415a1.pdf

For your convenience, listed below are the amounts of Cr, Ni, Pb, Zn and Al in outdoor air vs e-cigarette vapor: ;)

Cr: 5.53 vs 4.22
Ni: 5.57 vs 6.14 (+/-2.9)
Pb: 13.28 vs 9.85
Zn: 54.31 vs 56.08 (+/- 21 [sic])
Al: 333.27 (±62.93) vs 161.43 (±71.35)

So, vapor is actually healthier, per this study, than the air we breathe here in SoCal. :lol:
The PG/VG is sterilizing the air that we breathe. That's a GOOD thing! :D :vapor:
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,755
So-Cal
When people ask what power level they should use with a setup they are always advised to start low, and keep raising the power until it starts to taste bad, then drop it back a bit. That bad taste when the power is a little too high is nothing like a dry hit but it does taste noticeably bad. Never really considered what it was. Could be that's the start of formaldehyde being formed. If you had asked me a week ago I would have said it was just slightly burned juice.

And your Answer last week would probably be just as Valid Then as it is Today.

Because that Bad Taste is most likely something undergoing a Thermal Breakdown. Be it VG or PG or maybe a Flavoring(s) or Sweetener(s).
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,755
So-Cal
Here are all the data from the USC study, including Compounds, Outdoor air, e-Cigarette, and normal cigarette.http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/em/c4/c4em00415a/c4em00415a1.pdf

For your convenience, listed below are the amounts of Cr, Ni, Pb, Zn and Al in outdoor air vs e-cigarette vapor: ;)

Cr: 5.53 vs 4.22
Ni: 5.57 vs 6.14 (+/-2.9)
Pb: 13.28 vs 9.85
Zn: 54.31 vs 56.08 (+/- 21 [sic])
Al: 333.27 (±62.93) vs 161.43 (±71.35)

So, vapor is actually healthier, per this study, than the air we breathe here in SoCal. :lol:

That's why None of the stuff in this threads Scares me.

Because I don't look at my Mod as Producing Harmful Compounds. I look at my Mod as Filtering Out the Harmful Compounds from the Ambient Air.

;)
 

Zutankhamun

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 22, 2015
3,535
10,062
36
Rapture
I usually just use the * for the degree symbol. LOL

Well who'd a thought that a vaping forum would have me researching the chemical formula that has been derived when applying heat and oxygen at a particular °C/F to find out the rate and temp needed to combust (or close to) vegetable glycerin and/or propylene glycol.

And they said it was nicotine we needed to worry about 'pfft'
 

NU_FTW

Ultra Member
Dec 6, 2016
1,205
2,962
42
Last I heard was Florida, but it will come back to the North in late April.

Maybe test in a vacuum running say pure argon instead of air. While standing on a barrel of VG.

But yeah, if it in fact is lower than plain old air there is a flaw in the test method that requires clarification. That link was not to the original study but an interpretation of it, so it might not be so clear cut on that comparison. Still, benzene is just plain not good for you.
wouldn't vape displace the air thus diluting the amount in test result?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread