New studies find carcinogens in vg and pg at high temps, even in tootle puffers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zakillah

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 24, 2015
576
1,582
Vienna
Didn't go through the whole thread, so sorry if its already been pointed out, but, if the pg in a juice gets "boiled" much quicker than vg, and most of it is gone by the end of a tank,... Wouldn't the flavor be gone too?? 99.9% of flavor is in PG. I've never noticed my juice getting thicker at the bottom, or lack of flavor at all. Also, i thought that when a juice steeps, the molecules Bond together, wouldn't that make it impossible for one to boil off before the other?

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
You cant "destil" PG from VG. If you heat a liquid in a beaker, the gas phase will always be a mixture of both, with a higher PG ratio compared to the liquid.
However, our atties are no beakers on a heater. Think of an atty more as a hot plate where you drop a small amount of liquid on. All of it will vaporise almost immediatly. If all of your drop is vaporised, the gas phase will have the same composition as your liquid.
 

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
67
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Just returned to vaping and the forum, this is a thread of some concern indeed, and very long!
Could anyone sum up briefly the state of play?

As for measuring temps, what about those infra-red thermometers or if you are wealthy enough a Flir device?

Cheers.
Read the first page in the thread, then read my last two blog posts. That will bring you to speed.

And level of concern is only in nuances. Vaping is ~95% safer than smoking, paying attention to the temperature you are vaping can make it even safer.
 

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
67
Newport News, Virginia, United States
As for measuring temps, what about those infra-red thermometers or if you are wealthy enough a Flir device?.

I tried both. Several problems with an infra thermometer, the dot size being measured is usually much larger than the coil, so you get an average of the coil and the surrounding area.

And with both, the Flir camera, and the thermometer, you have to do it with the tank off and coil exposed. In other words you dont get the real life scenario of airflow, and a normal vape hit.


upload_2017-5-10_6-37-37.png



IR000005_zpsf2c1ee77.jpg
 
Last edited:

Oomee

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 6, 2013
534
1,830
UK
I tried both. Several problems with an infra thermometer, the dot size being measured is usually much larger than the coil, so you get an average of the coil and the surrounding area.

And with both, the Flir camera, and the thermometer, you have to do it with the tank off and coil exposed. In other words you dont get the real life scenario of airflow, and a normal vape hit.


View attachment 655831


IR000005_zpsf2c1ee77.jpg

Ahhh, good points!

Even a glass bead thermocouple is going to shield the measured section coil from airflow too.
Is the test set-up for the original study known?

It's a bit of a Shrodinger's cat, measuring it affects the D.U.T.

Only alternative I can think of is take absolute measurements of coil temp and resistance and plot the curve. Air flow should be negated for plotting the curve as it will skew surface temp of coil.
Then use curve to calculate coil temp in situ.
Same as a TC mod does(I presume) but with lab equipment you should (theoretically) be able to achieve a much higher accuracy.

I would help out but I have no way of accurately measuring the temp... a bit of a sod as I have the rest of the equipment.
Isn't that always the case with test gear though!
 

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
67
Newport News, Virginia, United States
OK, so on the testing I did last weekend I was using a teflon insulted 30awg thermocouple. It worked fine on my 26awg coil. The downside was that the teflon insulation was only rated to 500F and did not hold up to temps any higher.

To get a good response from the sensor, the sensor wire needs to be finer than the Atty coil wire.

Now, these Kangertech nichrome 1.5ohm coils look like about 30awg inside. I think my existing thermocouples would be too large. So I ordered 2 different types of 36awg thermocouples. One with Kapton insulation good to 600F, and another with braided glass insulation good to 900F. I also ordered a Kapton one that is 40awg good to 600F.

The glass braid (code GG) has a great temp limit but I dont know if it will hold up to the juice.
0.12 mm Glass Braid Over Each Conductor, and Binder Impregnated. Overall Glass Braid Applied and
Bindered. Binder Improves Moisture and Abrasion Resistance but Is Destroyed Above 204°C (400°F)
Anyway, it is worth a shot...


If I tuck the sensor through the top of the cartridge, in between the coil and the cotton, and then snake the sensor lead wire up through the center, and screw all the parts back together, it will probably work. I would cut a hole in the side of the drip tip for the sensor wire so that my mouth doesnt disturb the wire with each hit, it wont take much to break this setup.
Going from right to left in photo below...
upload_2017-5-10_10-4-35.png


upload_2017-5-10_9-49-48.png


upload_2017-5-10_10-28-9.png



Anyway, this is as close to tootle puffer as I think I can get with what I have available to me.

Once the new thermocouples get here I will run it on a DNA device in wattage mode and see what happens.
 
Last edited:

tj99959

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
  • Aug 13, 2011
    15,116
    39,600
    utah
    Anyway, this is as close to tootle puffer as I think I can get with what I have available to me.

    That's kind of a problem, don't ya think?
    If you're going to measure tootle puffer results, it seems to me that you would have to measure the gear that tootle puffers use.
    That would mean from the cartomizer through too the KayFun I would imagine.

    However I think I would start out with a simple 510 atomizer.
    That's where many of us tootle puffers started, and most of us set up our current gear to taste just like our old 510s tasted.

    Add:
    I was looking at your thermo graph and it would seem to me that "average, etc" doesn't matter. We are only interested in the highest point. So the only problem I see is that you can't duplicate actual vaping air fuel ratio (AFR) at the coil, which will effect temperature with that type of measuring device. So it's good for seeing if a TC mod is working properly only.
     
    Last edited:

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    Even a glass bead thermocouple is going to shield the measured section coil from airflow too.
    I tucked the sensor in between the wick an the coil, so the airflow over the coil was not restricted.

    upload_2017-5-10_11-4-57.png


    Is the test set-up for the original study known?
    Are you asking about my tests, or the Wang Study tests?
     

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    That's kind of a problem, don't ya think?
    If you're going to measure tootle puffer results, it seems to me that you would have to measure the gear that tootle puffers use.
    That would mean from the cartomizer through too the KayFun I would imagine.

    However I think I would start out with a simple 510 atomizer.
    That's where many of us tootle puffers started, and most of us set up our current gear to taste just like our old 510s tasted.
    I dont see it as a problem, I was asked "Have you the ability to test temperature of smaller wire? (32ga/33ga)" and I think I am coming pretty damn close. I have no intention of testing every generation of device out there, just trying to put a few questions to bed where I can.

    Unless I am mistaken, the TopTank Nano is gear that a tootle puffer might use (its what my GF uses), at least I would call it tootle puffer with the 1.5 ohm coil (10-26w) running on a VW device.

    Same atty as these.
    upload_2017-5-10_11-21-22.png
     
    Last edited:

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    The Wang Study.

    Was thinking of this after I posted and it is quite a tricky little problem.
    I think your set-up there is pretty "Shmick" as a certain Auzzy might say!

    Will have to read through the thread when I get time, been running around like the proverbial blue arsed fly this last few week.
    The Wang Study made no attempt to duplicate an atty. It was basically just a temperature controlled fog machine. They were simply testing at what temperatures do PG and VG start decomposing into nasties.
     

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    Add:
    I was looking at your thermo graph and it would seem to me that "average, etc" doesn't matter. We are only interested in the highest point. So the only problem I see is that you can't duplicate actual vaping air fuel ratio (AFR) at the coil, which will effect temperature with that type of measuring device. So it's good for seeing if a TC mod is working properly only.

    With the IR Guns, all you get is an average, you dont get a true "peak" within the target zone. I have tried several different guns, multiple times, and I was never able to obtain coil readings I would trust.

    Now, that Fluke Ti27 camera is the cats meow. I have used it ever since the early DNA40 days to gain confidence in TC tech. It will definitely tell you if your TC mod is reading correctly. "Control" however is a different matter, as once you introduce a load (air/juice flow) things "could" be different.

    The problem I often got when presenting those photos is that people would come up with a variety of things to discredit it. Like "no way that a saturated coil with good airflow could ever reach those temperatures". And they were right in the respect that it didnt truly measure the conditions (under load), inside the closed environment of an atty, which has ton of variables.

    Thats why I landed on the thermocouple method. I can check and trace the calibration all the way back to the NIST. It is measuring the temp in real time, inside of the closed atty environment, with all the variables of a normal vape being accounted for.

    TBH though, I normally just use the "Device Manager" in Escribe when troubleshooting my own issues. I have validated it enough that I have full confidence in it as long as I know the correct TCR for my wire. I am doing these thermocouple tests mainly to see what happens in VW mode as Escibe doesnt show that, and also to answer the question "how do you know if your mod is telling you the truth".
     

    Eskie

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    May 6, 2016
    16,087
    77,744
    NY
    I think your design is great. Being able to see what happens with a factory 1.5 ohm coil at low wattage will be really interesting. The idea of threading that thermocouple in looks sound, with the only concern I would have would be any leaking. Otherwise I can't see an alternative setup better than what you sketched out.
     

    Verb

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Apr 26, 2014
    1,563
    2,114
    Eastern, PA, USA

    beckdg

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Oct 1, 2013
    11,018
    35,706
    TN

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    So I haven't been back to this thread in a while, there's no way I can keep up with it, do we have any new information?
    Just some temperature testing of a coil, inside a real atty while vaping normally.

    Also the use of some TC wire in a VV mod to limit temp as the wire got hotter.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: kiba

    mikepetro

    Vape Geek
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    10,224
    81,686
    67
    Newport News, Virginia, United States
    What did you find? Anything interesting?
    More/less what I expected. DNA temps are accurate +/- 10 degrees, coil temps can indeed get up to and exceed 500F in VW mode, I couldnt taste anything bad until about 505F, lower Boiling point ejuice requires less temp for a good vape, boiling ejuice on the stove will give you a nic buzz, etc. See my last two blog posts for the results.
     

    kiba

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 21, 2012
    4,283
    7,451
    40
    Alexandria, Va, USA
    www.facebook.com
    More/less what I expected. DNA temps are accurate +/- 10 degrees, coil temps can indeed get up to and exceed 500F in VW mode, I couldnt taste anything bad until about 505F, lower Boiling point ejuice requires less temp for a good vape, boiling ejuice on the stove will give you a nic buzz, etc. See my last two blog posts for the results.
    So you actually started to taste something bad around 500F?
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread