Therein lies the first problem......Im an unrepentant over squonker and squounk between every hit.
Last edited:
Therein lies the first problem......Im an unrepentant over squonker and squounk between every hit.
In this scenario, the one question I have, is should I let it "drip" into the beakers, or should I let the wick contact the bottom (or some platform) of the beaker. I suspect the later would transfer more liquid. I guess the question is which represents the physics of an atty better.Here is where my head is bouncing around:
View attachment 662289
- Fill reservoir with just enough liquid to saturate wicks, plus a smidgen extra
- Allow it all to drain out into the beakers.
- Wait 10 minutes to allow complete drippage.
- Empty, rinse, dry, beaker and replace
- Refill reservoir and start a 5 minute timer.
- Remove beakers and weigh contents. (tare weights recorded in advance)
Does this seem "sound"?
Here is where my h ead is bouncing around:
View attachment 662289
- Fill reservoir with just enough liquid to saturate wicks, plus a smidgen extra
- Allow it all to drain out into the beakers.
- Wait 10 minutes to allow complete drippage.
- Empty, rinse, dry, beaker and replace
- Refill reservoir and start a 5 minute timer.
- Remove beakers and weigh contents. (tare weights recorded in advance)
Does this seem "sound"?
Pondering.....Your first round looks really well done. Yes, it is measuring capillary action, which is how juice moves through the wick in normal use. This second test appears to rely on gravity to "feed" the coil and my mind, this setup would run afoul as in our use, juice flow is not controlled by gravity. It's controlled by the evaporation of liquid off the coil being fed by the wick with resultant replacement by capillary action and any pressure change there is between the inside of the chamber and the air in the tank itself.
For a thought experiment, what about this.
A clear box with a divider in the middle. Make holes in the divider and have some sort of sealed in the divider tube in place so it's watertight across, and liquid can only move through the tube. Fill each with whatever wick. One one side, the target side, place something small like disposable cuvette under each wick end.
Now on the tank/juice side fill with your favorite whatever with coloring about halfway up, but not above the wick ends. Place an AIRTIGHT top on it, maybe just have a silicone bead along the top and place the top cover on.
Here's where the fun comes in. Obviously, there's no differential at this point between sides. Now, on the "chamber" side with the little plastic cuvettes have a hole on the back wall to which you have attached a rubber hose. Draw on that hose to create a pressure differential. That reproduces in tank conditions that normally drive flow. Measure how much liquid ends up in each cuvette and you now know the different flow rates all under the same condition. You can do it by a visual comparison, or with an accurate scale measured by weight (already tared for the cuvette)
There will have to be a method for air to eventually equilibrate between the sides, otherwise you'll get a vapor lock. Maybe a small hole in the top of the divider wall with a little flap on the liquid side which will allow air to move between the chamber. Sort of simulated the bubbles you normally see when you vape.
Oh, and as everything has to eventually even out to atmospheric pressure, leave the hose open after your draw to allow air back in to eliminate the differential.
As an added bonus, I probably have a dozen curvettes laying around from my aquarium test kits.
I oversized most everything filtration wise, saved me hours upon hours of maintenance. Most months I just need to clean the algae off the glass, and refill the automated fish food feeders. Every 2-3 months I change out all the filter elements.That's sure fully automated. Mine wasn't close. There was stuff like an ATO and a continuous pH probe. I needed both a heater and a chiller if the temp went up too much under the Halogen lighting or too low at "night". Never used a refugium on it although that does work real well. Well, that and a good protein skimmer to keep things clean. Water exchanges were still manual, although I did look into a continuous water exchange system but as long as the chemistry and tank remained stable, it wasn't justified.
They do make really nice Reefkeepr monitors/controllers that can really automate everything, but back then (we're talking 10-15 years going by my daughter's age) they not only less sophisticated, but far more expensive. I believe a salinity probe alone was in the $150 range. It was a lot of fun until it became too time consuming as I was working just to pay for my aquarium habit (sound familiar?), but it did great until I broke it down and made sure my corals and live rock were adopted into caring homes.
Well, I "guess" those damn bottom feeders are still on topic.....OK, I'll behave, no more fish stories.
Never went Salt, was tempted, but I decided never to attempt it unless I had an automated backup generator first. A 6 hour power loss could break your heart, and your bank. I would only need to add a very few things to convert though, the chiller being the most expensive part.
OK, I'll behave now too, just got me excited there for a sec......
Thanks - fixedAbout the title - "Beat Practices"?
Can I ? PLEASE!!!!I was pretty sure it was a mistype, but it could be interpreted as threatening to beat those of us who vape junk.![]()
Please read again, how does that sound?What about Under Avoid Chain Hitting something like this:
"This is true in both high watt high high airflow use, and low watt low airflow use. Low watt chain vaping can raise coil temperatures as well."
It's another way of communicating that just because you're puffing away at only 8W, you can't assume the coil will stay cool. Or written however it might sound better.