Please read again, how does that sound?
That works. One grammatical kinda thing, it should be "regardless" rather than "irregardless".
Please read again, how does that sound?
Fixed - English 101 was not my strong suite.... If you cant tell.That works. One grammatical kinda thing, it should be "regardless" rather than "irregardless".
Context:
The RCP announcement that vaping was 95% safer than smoking has been widely publicized, however the context of the entire report has not been talked about nearly as much.
From the Royal College of Physicians, 11 St Andrews Place, Regent's Park, London NW1 4LE
"E-cigarettes and long-term harm - the possibility of some harm from long-term e-cigarette use cannot be dismissed due to inhalation of the ingredients other than nicotine, but is likely to be very small, and substantially smaller than that arising from tobacco smoking. With appropriate product standards to minimise exposure to the other ingredients, it should be possible to reduce risks of physical health still further. Although it is not possible to estimate the long-term health risks associated with e-cigarettes precisely, the available data suggest that they are unlikely to exceed 5% of those associated with smoked tobacco products, and may well be substantially lower than this figure."
...
This is exactly why I am asking for feedback! Thanks.I hate to be a Stickler of Semantics. But the RCP Didn't say this...
"The RCP announcement that vaping was 95% safer than smoking..."
That is what Many People heard when RCP they read this...
"Although it is not possible to estimate the long-term health risks associated with e-cigarettes precisely, the available data suggest that they are unlikely to exceed 5% of those associated with smoked tobacco products, and may well be substantially lower than this figure."
... Or Repeated when someone else Posted that the RCP says that Vaping is 95% Safer than Smoking.
...
"The RCP announcement got widely publicized as meaning that vaping was 95% safer than smoking, however the detail and context of the entire report has not been talked about nearly as much."
Can I ? PLEASE!!!!
I know, but at least I can say I tried. It will also give me "links" I can point people to when they do become honestly interested.Mike, somehow I think you're trying to unscrew the inscrutable. After dealing with vapers, family members, who haven't got a clue and running them through all the standard stuff, like battery safety and proper usage, and getting that glassy eyed stare I don't know how this would go over in spite of being straightforward and in plain language with citations.
Done.....Looking good, but the really light yellow color you chose hurts my eyes. Could that be changed for the final draft?![]()
Several challenges here:Mike, somehow I think you're trying to unscrew the inscrutable. After dealing with vapers, family members, who haven't got a clue and running them through all the standard stuff, like battery safety and proper usage, and getting that glassy eyed stare I don't know how this would go over in spite of being straightforward and in plain language with citations.
...
It is kind of funny, but I really suspect that BT has been watching everything on all the forums and is developing new products based on what they learn from us "geeks". Kind of frosts my cookies to think that though.
Is it worth asking the Mods to put this in a sticky?
Best Practices to avoid high temps on VV/VW mods.
VV & VW Mod Temperature Variables
Capillary action of silica vs rayon
Actual temperatures inside a Vivi Nova on both VV and VW devices.
Actual temperature inside VW Tootle Puffer rig.
Juice Boiling Point and Vaping Temperatures
Real Life temp measurements inside a 2016 era atty
It is kind of funny, but I really suspect that BT has been watching everything on all the forums and is developing new products based on what they learn from us "geeks". Kind of frosts my cookies to think that though.