Didn't make an argument, I asked the question. Why are you not fighting Starbucks to
vape INSIDE?
vaping is harmless second hand, right? So, why stop at outside their establishments? Why not demand to do it inside? Isn't that also a liberty you've lost?
PS. IF the exterior of a Starbucks is their property they can do what they wish. You never had any liberties on private property, so you haven't lost anything. You never had the liberty to go grocery shopping in bare feet either. Or any one of a number of other policies on private property that are there for one reason or another.
You seem confused about what liberties actually are. The government taking away your rights to do something is having liberties taken away. Private property rules are not. It's damaging to the
vape cause when you confuse those issues.