....
Now tell me again how cool you are because you own a $120k car.
I would actually be embarrassed to be seen in or with those vehicles and would certainly never admit to owning them...
....
Now tell me again how cool you are because you own a $120k car.
$250 is impressive to a teenager maybe....and I have stated in several posts that I think its too much for a mod to me.$250 mods roll pretty easily. Compensating for something?
I dont get the whole e peen thing anyways....bragging about the money you spend isnt a good thing, especially when you dont know the person you are bragging to.
Not me. I used to spend that much on cigarettes every month.$250 mods roll pretty easily. Compensating for something?
Not me. I used to spend that much on cigarettes every month.
There is no "sense of entitlement" all of you holier than thou authentic fanatics keep parading around threads like you're hot. I've seen it so many times in the new members forum, a new vaper buys a clone and it's instantly jumped on. "Oh no, that's wrong, you're stealing. You need this $400 mod instead." It leaves a bad taste in everyone's mouth, except people like you.
If a clone is 1:1 with an original and it's 10% of the price, which is often the case, it's an obvious choice unless your corrupted "morality" gets in the way. If I can pay less for the same exact thing and still have enough to buy lunch for the week, I'm going to do it. Anyone with enough sense would.
I think its funny that there's people in the world that would choose to judge people based on the price and maker of their e-cig. That's PRICELESS.
The only 2 arguments that could be had about your post is that better contacts on a mech will deliver more current and some fuse protection is a good idea in case someone is using an unprotected battery. (BTW, you should really be using an ICR as IMR's have a much lower amp output).
It's about judging people who steal and those who support them by buying stolen property.
It's about judging people who steal and those who support them by buying stolen property.
Exactly. For some people as long as it's THEIR bike that isn't getting stolen it's all fair game.Ah, but the counter will be that they didn't protect their intellectual property ...
To that I say the various "protections" aren't actually doing any protecting, they simply set up the ability to seek out compensation for the wrongs that have been done.
A law against theft for example is not what keeps me from taking the bike out of my neighbors unfenced yard; I know it's wrong to steal.
Maurice
It's about judging people who steal and those who support them by buying stolen property.
Exactly. For some people as long as it's THEIR bike that isn't getting stolen it's all fair game.
A few US makers do have patents and trademarks. If they chose to take legal action to protect their property I'm sure they'd take a bunch of grief for that too.