Hi priorities, we have a Site Feedback and Help for questions if you ever need help : Site Feedback and Help
Agreed "some enforcement" wasn't my point.
If one comes in to contact with well known members of the vaping community, people who never post here, there is one recurring theme as to why, and it has nothing to do with the speed of the site, or even some enforcement of the rules. The op raised the question and I was answering from what I have seen.
Yes, there is definitely a way to make the Outside less addictive...I just wish there was some way to make the outside less addictive.
You are wrong. I'm pretty sure you are deliberately wrong most of the time that you are wrong. That's called trolling on forums and usenet. In the real world it's called lying. -- six
I actually enjoyed reading that.
Yes, there is definitely a way to make the Outside less addictive...
Don't go there...
Ever...
That's what I do.
![]()
Hmm I'm not a volunteer, a moderator or a member or anything, but I do think this place is run pretty well and is extremely helpful to newbs and people who've been at this a while. I do feel sometimes that there is a bent or bias in favor of vendors or business owners instead of us consumers. Like someone will post something critical of a vendor and it will be removed for no good reason.
I believe that sort of thing should be allowed to stand and then the vendor can present his/her side of it. Just so that everyone has an equal voice. There are several top notch vendors and then there are those that, while even being ecf approved are very shady. And I'm not talking about BWB here whiskey, Don and his juice are awesome.
Can't say I always agree. Can't say I'm impressed with an * by peoples title without explanation (Hawthorne fans maybe?), but overall a job well done.
Since we don't know the process, IDK how we can suggest anything. Generally, I would suggest an internal review process for infractions, or a review of existing procedures, to ensure consistency across moderators/admins. I'm pretty sure you have some methods now, but I don't know what they are. Is there a review process, or an appeal process? Of course, you don't want to overload the volunteers either and they have to be able to handle the average/minor stuff without red tape. The only areas I can think of are the "grey areas" where a bad mood, or past feeling could impair judgement for one admin/mod but not another. I would guess that 99% are cut and dry. It's that 1% that gets you every time and a review process helps that.
Ban Enquiries ................................................................ forum[AT]e-cigarette-forum[DOT]com
Please make the subject line of your email: BAN
Hi priorities, we have a Site Feedback and Help for questions if you ever need help : Site Feedback and Help
I am still at a loss as to why the classifieds and co-op section is closed to non verified members!!! I "choose" not to be verified as I am very particular as to who I share my private info with... I don't know any of the moderators or administrators of this forum. Is that a reason as to bar me, (or anyone else), from a part of the forum? If a seller or trader decides not to deal with me it should be their prerogative...not the forum moderators or administrators!!! This is the latest thing that has me upset by the forum and yes, I have thought about leaving said forum because of this... My privacy is "MY PRIVACY"...