Per the 4th page in the mouser.com provided PDF on Panasonic Prolytic Graphite Sheets, page 4, the thermal conductivity (Watts/Meter-Kelvin) for PGS 100μm is from 600 to 800 in the X, Y directions. In the Z direction, 15.
http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/ThermalGraphiteSheets.pdf
Units of heat applied to the surface of a 1 cm square area of PGS 100μm will travel an average of 0.5 cm to reach the 1 cm edge of the area. The same energy will travel 0.01 cm to pass through the surface of the 100 micrometer sheet.
I'll give some bias to the X, Y directions and choose a value of 750 W/m-K.
10 Watts applied to surface and traveling in the X, Y directions will generate 10 Watts/0.005 meters = 2,000 units.
10 Watts applied to the surface and traveling in the Z direction will generate 10 watts/0.0001 meters = 100,000 units.
Now for the offered thermal coeficients...750 for X,Y and 15 for Z...
2,000 units x 750 = 1,500,000. 100,000 units x 15 = 1,500,000.
For the size of 1 cm x 1 cm and 100μm thickness, the energy traveling in the Z-axis is the same as the energy traveling in the X and Y axes.
This is proof enough for me that the Z axis contains significant thermal conductivity relative to the area of material as might be utilized in an SS Mesh wrapped wick. Further adding to the energy which might pass through the Z axis is the notion that the prolytic graphite sheet of 1 cm x 1 cm AND rolled into a tube would elimante the heat flowing out in the X and Y axes. That limit of the flow away from the mesh would create more heat than if we were dealing with an unbounded 1 cm x 1 cm area within a continuous sheet as would be implied by the calculations.
If thermal transmission capacity is the only criteria, I suspect the Graphite Sheets will work fine. Number of possible layer and such are beyond this illustration. While the thermal capabilities seem encouraging, there may be physical properties and possible electrical conductance concerns that remain to be understood more clearly. As well, the Graphite Sheets have a specified Heat Resistance value of 400 degrees C.
F.A.U.F. (Factual And Useful Formulas)
1 meter = 100 cm = 1,000 mm = 1,000,000 μm
1 inch = 2.56 cm
1 cm = 10 mm = ~0.3937" = ~3/8".
The circumfrence of a 3/32" diameter wick is about 0.748 cm or 7.48 mm
This poster reserves the right to edit the post as he sees fit.
I appreciate seeing your calcs, they appear well thought out and to be correct. Only problem with the stuff now is that it is more conductive, apparently, than stainless steel. And we've just seen a coil (not thouroughly tested, of course) reach around 550ºC. I'd have to conclude that this is not the answer we're looking for. You could paint it and roll it in ceramic and all other kinds of good things, but then that is really complicating things.
Maybe when Bapgood gets his order in, he can confirm/disprove the conductivity and temperature resisting issues.
Last edited: