maybe, but either way what I said was likely a bit too far. Just didn't think about it at the time.Deb, I think Retired was aiming that chastisement at me, not you. You were just attempting to be funny about the phrase "quantum entanglements," which is way beyond the understanding of most readers (and many real scientists too).I thought I was being funny in my response too, but it obviously was not taken that way. Relax, Ret1, I think we do understand your inference and none of us would ever go that far on this thread.