I do agree, Rosco. Let's give them any knowledge and experience they are willing to learn from, and not deny them either. If they won't learn our way, they can learn some other way.
However, not informing people about safe practices is not something we should be lax on in my opinion.
Well, I for one actually do care about peoples safety. There is always going to be something that causes the community trouble, some people don't like vaping or smoking or any number of other habits that they simply disagree with. So be it, we will always have something that we are defending. However, not informing people about safe practices is not something we should be lax on in my opinion.
It is true that kids (or dogs) need to learn that fire is hot and in the example you gave, it is true that the dog might get singed and never do it again. However, we are not talking about permanent disfigurement or major loss of property in that example. If someone causes a group of people or another individual to get hurt, then I really see that as a problem. I hate to use this example because it evokes fear mongering and doesn't exactly apply, but it gets my point across. If your dog were to drag a stick of dynamite over to that same stove, would you be saying the same thing. It's true that he won't make that mistake again, but, you won't have the opportunity to stop him again either.
Originally Posted by Rosco P. Coltrane
Probably going to get flamed on this but the libertarian in me can't resist.
I feel this entire conversation is silly. It lacks truth. Are you really concerned with stupid people who do stupid things and their safety? Or are you concerned that when a stupid person does something stupid, that somehow it will cause the "community" at large some form of trouble
Again...help other when you can...which in your example would include taking the dynamite away. But the only way to keep everyone safe would be to ban things like mechs. Then someone would just build it themselves. We cannot save everybody. We can warn and help when we can...but that's it.
That might have been mentioned in passing...Sorry if this was already mentioned. What about a sub-ohm forum with a "read this first" sticky? The forum title would reel in any newbie cloud chasers and they might learn something about the do's and dont's in the process. There's already ad-nauseam about all the info. Just not in one spot.
The Provari thing is not a safety issue. This is different.
It's not that simple or it would probably be solved already. You can't just answer everyone's question with a link. Some people are not going to follow it and some questions need custom responses. Then there are the inexperienced ECF'ers trying to help. And if you say no talk of sub-ohms until you meet our requirements, people are going to go back to YouTube.
OK, 5 pages into this thread and I can't keep reading... Maybe I am going to get flamed for this, but there seems to be a few things that are really erking me on this thread and board (a lot of the time).
The level of pretentiousness that is exuding from post after post is maddening. It seems that just because you are a noob on this forum, you must be a noob to vaping in general. People are basing someone's knowledge level on their join date. Hate to burst your bubble, but a lot of people don't seek out forums until they need help.
Secondly I don't own a provari or a dna or an reo... Just a basic chi, a king and a hammer... Am I still cool enough to be a part of this clique? I understand that a lot of the people on this forum have a relationship with one another, and that like minds flock together but it seems like some people on this site see my king with a .35 ohm as a sub par unit...
oh well...
It's nice to know that in my 50th decade on the planet I'm still capable of being an immature, elitist ....... Thanks for the compliment, I think.![]()
/me looks at her avatar and thinks to herself well yes I am an elfYou're 500 years old? What are you, an elf?
I had a small epiphany today, that perhaps the members - with the best intentions in the world - are shouldering too much responsibility.
/me looks at her avatar and thinks to herself well yes I am an elf![]()
Yes, for the manufacturers and vendors.
I was not a babe in the woods when I got a mod w/a menu system a year into vaping. No instructions. Had to search the internet for a copy of the menu system. Ditto, the multimeter I purchased.
Thankfully people here enjoy the community aspect and sharing........a unique group, cuz there's not any industries i can think of that have legions of unpaid instructors/product reps.
One can't help but WORRY though a little about all the thousands of vapers who don't go to internet forums. Vaping is better than smoking of course, but we can't have it turn into 1) if a young person starts smoking they might get cancer and 2) if a young person starts vaping they might blow half their face off.
That's not really a not the either/or situation we want to see.![]()
Well, I for one actually do care about peoples safety.
the libertarian in me can't resist.
My wife was yelling at the dog tonight because he was sleeping very close to the wood stove, I told her to leave him be, she said he will burn himself, I replied, he just may, but he will only do it once.
Create a sub-ohm safety sticky and encourage veterans to answer all sub-ohm questions with a link to said sticky?
It's not that simple or it would probably be solved already. You can't just answer everyone's question with a link. Some people are not going to follow it and some questions need custom responses.
You could answer AND provide the link. We know some are going to do what they want, but we can at least say we gave an appropriate warning.
Even though this place is hard to navigate and half the forum is old subs and unusable, and search is useless, it has lots of info.