And sorry to all for the 'diversion' with Zoidman. For me - and this is more me than Zoidman, conversations with him is like speaking to someone in a Foreign language - much is 'lost in translation'. I suspect, for some, the same goes for me.
My intent is always to be as clear as possible. I don't always achieve that.
That said, as many others have stated or implied, this is a political discussion - it's what has driven the deeming and the opposition to it. The first action in solving problems is to identify the problem. If one doesn't do that, you'll never solve it. But gov't is force - so even if you are exact on identifying the problem, the power to coerce wins over reason and consent, until you get enough in numbers to change that.
That said, as many others have stated or implied, this is a political discussion - it's what has driven the deeming and the opposition to it. The first action in solving problems is to identify the problem. If one doesn't do that, you'll never solve it. But gov't is force - so even if you are exact on identifying the problem, the power to coerce wins over reason and consent, until you get enough in numbers to change that.