In the Colorado thread someone mentioned creating an APV batt sticky.
I have been heavily involved in 4 or 5 threads in the past 3 days. So, I'm not sure where I said what. Yesterday was my 90th day smoke free. When I started, I bought a KR808 starter kit. It got me thru the first week or 2, but I knew if I was going to stick this out I was going to have to ramp it up. I got an eGo-T kit and was off to the races. Basically a couple of weeks into the eGo rush I got the "vape Bug". At this point I knew nothing about batts except you stick them in and go, when they stop working you thread them into the charger and wait for green. I went to a reputable ECF vendor and bought a steel tube APV kit. The site said it took 3 diff batt combinations for 3 diff voltages. I purchased the other 2 batt combos and a second charger from the same site. I asked a rep if the second charger, being of much better quality, would charge all the batts I got. He said yes. Well it wasn't true. The batts that came w the kit were diff than the other 2 sets and needed the charger that came w the kit. Just by coincidence I asked another member a question about the multimeter I had just purchased, and he noticed that in the specs I listed that I was headed for trouble. He posted right away to never put said batts on the second charger as they will not play well or at all.
At this point, all the press about the Fl incident, and the fact that I was getting bad info from the vendor, made me step back and look at what I was really doing. I put the APV away, and spent days reading all the info I could find here and on Battery University. I was shocked at what was really in the making, once I got an education. I was stacking batts in a steel tube APV, with very insufficient venting, basically using a pipe bomb (Roly's term), without even a clue.
I have 4 kids under 12. So, to say the least I was peaved. I let the vendor have it!
I think there are a combination of things that need to happen here to keep this sort of thing from repeating itself. I think, as others mentioned, there has to be an insert in the APV itself. It needs to contain the do's and donts, and a link to a sticky here that starts off with the catastrophic no no's, and then links from there to everything I had to read to bring myself up to speed.
The problem is that half, if not most, wont take the time required to do all that. So it must be simplified somehow.
Other people said making APVs a certain shape, at least the batt slot, so they only take a specific shape. The prob there is batts aren't going to change shape.
Another said a circuit that can tell weather something is amiss. If we can create devices that can practically vape for us, we can make a chip that can do the aforementioned.
I felt it important that you get where I'm coming from with this. If someone such as myself with the time and presence of mind to recognize a dangerous situation, and then spend the time and money to get it right, can be put in a precarious position, we have a long way to go.
So, I'm guessing you can sincerely relate to the Colorado situation and the poor guy who suffered injury. It isn't hard to understand how the average technology consumer (the iPhone usesr for example) could easily get lost in all the tech speak and cross talk in these forums and the other online resources.
I completely agree with the insert idea, and I think that's a place where we can start to campaign manufacturers and vendors so that their customers have the information they need. The insert should contain information about which batteries should only be used in the device (not just a gentle recommendation) and the resistance range of carts / atties / clearos that can be used as well. If it's a VV device (like the Provari), it should also probably contain a grid for resistance value ranges at different settings for safe use. A single sheet of paper printed on both sides should give the user sufficient information to use most devices within the safety guidelines.