We Vapers are Screwed!

Status
Not open for further replies.

emus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 9, 2009
4,804
2,007
Good point..Well here in the US we have what is known as the "Nanny State" The government treats us all as if
we were children incapable to make sound decisions for ourselves. So they make them for us. Ikr..it's stupid isn't it?

Someone mentioned the forbidden fruit effect.
Since alcohol wasn't illegal the kids weren't Siren drawn to it.
 

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
I don't think your analogy holds up. We ban alcohol to minor because we think it is bad for them. We are agreeing to a ban on vaping by minors because it is good for us.

I realize it isn't that simple.
My own position to hold my nose and not oppose banning for minors but I won't support it either. This is one of those situations where I would rather leave it to parents.

Why not Traver? Nicotine isn't a harmless substance and is addictive.
Recent research has shown how nicotine acts on the brain. Nicotine activates the circuitry that regulates feelings of pleasure, the so-called reward pathways. Research has shown that nicotine increases the levels of dopamine (a key brain chemical involved in mediating the desire to consume drugs) in the reward circuits. Nicotine's pharmacokinetic properties have been found to enhance its abuse potential. Cigarette smoking produces a rapid distribution of nicotine to the brain, with drug levels peaking within 10 seconds of inhalation. The acute effects of nicotine dissipate within a few minutes, causing the need to continue repeated intake throughout the day.
Nicotine | Psychology Today

So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.
 

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
We need to define what the purpose is behind the law.


We don't ban alcohol to minors because they can get addicted. We ban it because it is a mind-altering substance, and used in excess can cause instant death by overdose, and over time can cause liver and other damage. Age restrictions make sense here.

See above answer to Traver
 

emus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 9, 2009
4,804
2,007
Why not Traver? Nicotine isn't a harmless substance and is addictive.
Recent research has shown how nicotine acts on the brain. Nicotine activates the circuitry that regulates feelings of pleasure, the so-called reward pathways. Research has shown that nicotine increases the levels of dopamine (a key brain chemical involved in mediating the desire to consume drugs) in the reward circuits. Nicotine's pharmacokinetic properties have been found to enhance its abuse potential. Cigarette smoking produces a rapid distribution of nicotine to the brain, with drug levels peaking within 10 seconds of inhalation. The acute effects of nicotine dissipate within a few minutes, causing the need to continue repeated intake throughout the day.
Nicotine | Psychology Today

So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.

Wish it would regulate my feelings of pleasure.
 

pamdis

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 11, 2013
808
2,208
IL
Why not Traver? Nicotine isn't a harmless substance and is addictive.
Recent research has shown how nicotine acts on the brain. Nicotine activates the circuitry that regulates feelings of pleasure, the so-called reward pathways. Research has shown that nicotine increases the levels of dopamine (a key brain chemical involved in mediating the desire to consume drugs) in the reward circuits. Nicotine's pharmacokinetic properties have been found to enhance its abuse potential. Cigarette smoking produces a rapid distribution of nicotine to the brain, with drug levels peaking within 10 seconds of inhalation. The acute effects of nicotine dissipate within a few minutes, causing the need to continue repeated intake throughout the day.
Nicotine | Psychology Today

So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.

Identical to caffeine. :)

Does Caffeine Affect Dopamine Levels? | LIVESTRONG.COM
 

Crypto66

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 8, 2013
81
17
Chicago, Illinois
Okay one sec... I'm 18 and my girlfriend is 17. We have both smoked since we have been 13 but I decided that I like vaping a lot better. We went into a B&M and without being IDed we were allowed to test nic filled juices and purchase them without being carded. Now I am of legal age but not once were we carded. So this is a thing indeed.

Sent from my One X using Tapatalk
 

Traver

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 28, 2010
1,822
662
WV
Why not Traver? Nicotine isn't a harmless substance and is addictive.
Recent research has shown how nicotine acts on the brain. Nicotine activates the circuitry that regulates feelings of pleasure, the so-called reward pathways. Research has shown that nicotine increases the levels of dopamine (a key brain chemical involved in mediating the desire to consume drugs) in the reward circuits. Nicotine's pharmacokinetic properties have been found to enhance its abuse potential. Cigarette smoking produces a rapid distribution of nicotine to the brain, with drug levels peaking within 10 seconds of inhalation. The acute effects of nicotine dissipate within a few minutes, causing the need to continue repeated intake throughout the day.
Nicotine | Psychology Today

So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.

Before I start banning things I need to know a few things for which I currently don't have answers.
Can you tell me what harm nicotine does without the smoke?
Can you tell me how addictive it is without the smoke?
Would a ban for minors work or would it make it cool?
Would teens turn to cigarettes or other drugs instead?
 

B1sh0p

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2013
943
1,239
Chicago
I want regulation of minors and cigalikes. I don't trust cigalike companies to not put additives in their devices. I don't want minors vaping.

I don't want regulation for nic base. They will never be able to regulate our devices. They will be able to regulate our ability to obtain nic base. I'd prefer we look for compromises to keep the the availability of liquid nicotine.

DIY is what's truly at risk for us vapers.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
I understand that in most places, it is legal for minors to buy and consume non-alcoholic beer.

So what would be the logic for prohibiting minors from non-nicotine vaping?

We claim it's safe right?

Exactly what I was thinking.
If somebody has a problem with vaping because it looks like smoking, then does that mean they have a problem with non-alcoholic beverages in fancy bottles, like 'sparkling wine' for example which has no alcohol but looks like its champagne.
 

Baldr

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 14, 2011
1,391
1,671
Dallas, Tx
So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.

I'm a bit over 50 years old. Cigarettes have been regulated and minors prohibited for all of my life. I see no sign that it's done anything at all to keep the ones that wanted to smoke from smoking.

Most people that smoke start before they are 18. That happens now, and it happened when I was, well, lets just say "not yet 18".

So lets not talk about "I don't think they should" because while I suspect we agree on that, I also think it's pretty clear that the ones who want to do it are going to do it, regardless of the law.

All evidence (based on cigarettes, beer/alcohol, sex, and substances that are not at all legal regardless of your age) is that the ones who want to do it are going to do it anyway.

So, what do we gain by making it harder for them to vape?

I do expect those laws to happen. But I don't think they will actually help. And if it were my kid, I would much rather them start vaping than smoking cigs. I would discourage them from either, but I would much prefer that they vape instead of smoke.
 

B1sh0p

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2013
943
1,239
Chicago
I'm a bit over 50 years old. Cigarettes have been regulated and minors prohibited for all of my life. I see no sign that it's done anything at all to keep the ones that wanted to smoke from smoking.

Most people that smoke start before they are 18. That happens now, and it happened when I was, well, lets just say "not yet 18".

So lets not talk about "I don't think they should" because while I suspect we agree on that, I also think it's pretty clear that the ones who want to do it are going to do it, regardless of the law.

All evidence (based on cigarettes, beer/alcohol, sex, and substances that are not at all legal regardless of your age) is that the ones who want to do it are going to do it anyway.

So, what do we gain by making it harder for them to vape?

I do expect those laws to happen. But I don't think they will actually help. And if it were my kid, I would much rather them start vaping than smoking cigs. I would discourage them from either, but I would much prefer that they vape instead of smoke.

Kids have been stealing since I was a kid. Why should we stop them? Kids have been killing since I was a kid. Why should we stop them? People break laws. People break rules. That doesn't make rules any less valid.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Concerning the issue of kids.... bottom line is we got more immediate problems to worry about; we don't want the industry to get crushed by a picture of 10 year olds puffing away on pipes.



Meanwhile.... I discovered ecigs around July this year, and now after 3 decades of smoking I no longer spend all that money on cartons of cigarettes; I've dropped off the radar as far as revenue to the tobacco industry; how many people are dropping off the radar every month? The way these things go , things tend to go faster and faster at first, sooner of later the tobacco companies are going to see their bottom line unmistakeably running away from them, and theyre going to be holding meetings and coming up with strategys;; obviously spend some money lobbying the FDA to throw some roadblocks and slow down the train.

As smokers drop of the tobacco revenue stream every month, those people aren't coming back.
 

kbf101998

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,759
3,917
Brentwood, Tn, USA
I agree 100%. I have often said that I am waiting on the scales at the checkout line at the grocery store to base a decision to what a person is allowed to buy and how much to tax the items that contain too much 'sugar or fat'. Restaurants the same--menu choices based on weight.
If the issue is truly health issues that they want to bring up--then obesity causes as many health problems if not more than smoking!

Change the title of your post to "We Rational People are screwed".

Folks who use the "renormalization of smoking" argument are simply allowing the rest of us to see the visible symptoms of their own mental deficiencies. It is clearly a cry for help.

First there were smokers and people who wanted them to quit for a multitude of reasons. Some of the reasons were health related, but deep down, there was also the desire to coerce or control other people. The anti smoking crowd "won" that battle. Flat out, they won. Then, along come the vaping crowd. How dare they thwart the anti smoking crowd's desire to control their behavior? You can't do that! Behave as we want you to. Sure, we know this it is NOT smoking. Sure, we know that nicotine is harmless. Sure, we know that there is no impact to non smokers. But we are not going to allow you to live your life the way that YOU want, you must live your life the way that WE want.

I say we join together and use the nuclear option. Now that we have to pay for each others' health care, we (vapers) should press for complete bans on real cigarettes. If you can't beat them, join them. But we know that they really NEED the tax revenues from smoking. They won't do without it. So we should flip the tables, and make a very public effort to get a nationwide ban on all real cigarettes. They kill people, you know. At this point, it would be the government fighting to keep them legal, since they stand to lose the most money in the event that they were banned.

I say we double down, and push for a "fat" tax. $50 per pound on your 1040 for every pound that you are over "standard weight". Overweight people can sometimes smell bad, they "renormalize" eating too much and not exercising enough as a valid lifestyle. It cost more in fuel to drive or fly them somewhere, and they just overall take up more floor space, so we should tax them for that extra usage.

Some monkey once said that vaping was a luxury that should be taxed, I think he was wrong, but going with his logic, extra fat is a luxury and should be taxed. I don't have any extra fat, but I want some. People with more than me should be taxed...
 

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
I'm a bit over 50 years old. Cigarettes have been regulated and minors prohibited for all of my life. I see no sign that it's done anything at all to keep the ones that wanted to smoke from smoking.

That's true Baldr -- They can even buy cigarettes online if they want to.
http://www.dutyfreedepot.com/buy-duty-free-cigarettes.htm

So I guess putting laws into effect wouldn't do much at all as far as a deterrent gos.



So lets not talk about "I don't think they should" because while I suspect we agree on that, I also think it's pretty clear that the ones who want to do it are going to do it, regardless of the law.

All evidence (based on cigarettes, beer/alcohol, sex, and substances that are not at all legal regardless of your age) is that the ones who want to do it are going to do it anyway.

As always it's up to the parents to police their children..As usual though most will just do what they want to do behind the parents back.

So, what do we gain by making it harder for them to vape?

I think it would make the vaping community a bit more respected if we made it harder for children to obtain vaping materials, but
other than that, nothing to gain imo.

I do expect those laws to happen. But I don't think they will actually help. And if it were my kid, I would much rather them start vaping than smoking cigs. I would discourage them from either, but I would much prefer that they vape instead of smoke.

The laws will come making it more expensive for us, but not for the reason of underage sales. It will come because as Edward Lewis posted, tobacco companies are loosing revenue because people are wising up and finding an easy way out of smoking cigarettes. Drug companies that make the pills and patches are loosing revenue too. I'm sure the lobbyist will soon be lining up at the Senates doors hounding our senators to introduce this or that bill that will tax us and laws to prohibit this or that. Oh yeah, that's coming our way for sure!
 
Last edited:

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
I agree 100%. I have often said that I am waiting on the scales at the checkout line at the grocery store to base a decision to what a person is allowed to buy and how much to tax the items that contain too much 'sugar or fat'. Restaurants the same--menu choices based on weight.
If the issue is truly health issues that they want to bring up--then obesity causes as many health problems if not more than smoking!
The Nanny State -- It wouldn't surprise me in the least if restrictions were implemented on every purchase of foods or drinks due to health risks now that the government runs our health insurance kbf.
 

Ryedan

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2012
12,869
19,652
Ontario, Canada
Why not Traver? Nicotine isn't a harmless substance and is addictive.
Recent research has shown how nicotine acts on the brain. Nicotine activates the circuitry that regulates feelings of pleasure, the so-called reward pathways. Research has shown that nicotine increases the levels of dopamine (a key brain chemical involved in mediating the desire to consume drugs) in the reward circuits. Nicotine's pharmacokinetic properties have been found to enhance its abuse potential. Cigarette smoking produces a rapid distribution of nicotine to the brain, with drug levels peaking within 10 seconds of inhalation. The acute effects of nicotine dissipate within a few minutes, causing the need to continue repeated intake throughout the day.
Nicotine | Psychology Today

So yeah, it should be regulated and minors prohibited from it use imho.

I vaped zero nic for about nine months, went back to 10 mg for a month and then back to zero for the next two months. For me, the effects you write about above are so minor as to be negligible. I compare it to caffeine which I also stopped using regularly. I found cigarettes very addictive.

So for me it's a matter of degree. Are we addicted to sugar, caffeine, a glass of wine or two with dinner? I think of nic like those things now and do not consider any of these addicting. I do also realize not everyone is the same, but a lot of vapers who reduce nic levels report the same type of experience.

As for harm, I know of no data indicating more health risk from nicotine than the other items I mentioned.
 
Last edited:

jpargana

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2010
777
2,537
55
Portugal
CASAA and I believe most vapers, support age requirements for buying e-liquid with nicotine. A long time kiosk vendor I talked to stated he cards anyone who looks younger than 30.

But, he presented me with an interesting dilemma. He has parents asking him to sell them a kit for their 16 & 17 year old children who smoke so the kids can break their smoking habit. Is this any different than selling the nicotine patch, gum, inhaler, etc to a parent for their under-age smoking child? I can definitely understand the parents wanting to try anything to get their kids off analogs.

On the surface, under-age vaping would look like a "black & white" issue. But there are always wrinkles that we don't always consider.

(the example of the kid just wanting to be cool, well, I hope those situations are few because they are not good for the community)

This.

On the other hand, we do not see ANY governmental agency crying out loud for a ban on tobacco cigarettes if/when an irresponsible vendor happens to be caught selling tobacco to minors. (The kind of vendor who used to sell me tobacco, when I started at the age of fifteen).
When that happens, the vendor is to blame, not tobacco itself...! And we do not see any real effort to ban tobacco (remember the flavoured tobacco ban in the US? With the very convenient menthol exception??) because, of course, governments get an hefty profit from tobacco taxes. Not just income, but actually profit.

When the very same problem occurs with the electronic cigarette (a competitor of tobacco cigarettes), it suddenly appears that vendors cannot be held to account anymore. Apparently, the e-cig is an insidious, terrible product that seems to be able to sell itself to little children and toddlers, and therefore must be banned !!

I don't know, people in general seem to have lost any thinking or logic skills. I say this not as any kind of offense, but only by stating the simple fact that most of them are so gullible as to believe most of the crappy arguments and junk-science the ANTZ's feeds them almost everyday...!

:(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread