The hoops really start at the end of this year.
I've said it before, elsewhere, anyone choosing to stay in business at this point is brave and has my gratitude for that.I really feel for vendors right now, they have to jump thru all these hoops to be able to sell only 2 more years! Honestly if I were a vendor I think I'd bail on 8-8-16. Just so much hassle.
Same way they enforce age restrictions for cigarettes, they send someone in posing as a consumer.Any idea on how they would enforce such miniscule regs as twisting a coil? Or any of these regulations? Does it fall on each state to enforce these things, like a health inspector?
I for one, think that they overreached on purpose so it looks better in the end.
ATF and Many state agencies since it will be a tobacco product.Any idea on how they would enforce such miniscule regs as twisting a coil? Or any of these regulations? Does it fall on each state to enforce these things, like a health inspector?
I for one, think that they overreached on purpose so it looks better in the end.
The regs are intentionally written open ended. There is no end.Same way they enforce age restrictions for cigarettes, they send someone in posing as a consumer.
I've seen this idea of "they made the regs really bad so they can settle for less" before, and there's one thing I don't understand. These are the Final rules. For all intents and purposes they go live in two weeks. Where is this "end?"
Any idea on how they would enforce such miniscule regs as twisting a coil? Or any of these regulations?
I'm not so sure the FDA anticipated much of a legal challenge. After all, the cigarette rules, which are pretty much the same, have gone mostly uncontested for the past 7 years.So then it would be a state enforcement, ala "boots on the ground".
My point being that they seemed to have a broad umbrella of definitions/actions that they know will be challenged/settled, and will make it for some to be a win inside of a huge loss. @Lessifer that is the end. Meaning the FDA endgame.
Same way they enforce age restrictions for cigarettes, they send someone in posing as a consumer.
It seems to me the "goals" could have been easily accomplished with one simple rule...I'm not so sure the FDA anticipated much of a legal challenge. After all, the cigarette rules, which are pretty much the same, have gone mostly uncontested for the past 7 years.
In California it's under 21...Just rumor I heard, no more, no less. I heard hiring is already in progress with emphasis on females age 16 - 17. I hope they follow child labor laws !
(c) Provide that primary responsibility for enforcement of this division shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department shall conduct random, onsite sting inspections at retail sites and shall enlist the assistance of persons that are under 21 years of age in conducting these enforcement activities. The department may conduct onsite sting inspections in response to public complaints or at retail sites where violations have previously occurred, and investigate illegal sales of tobacco products to any person under 21 years of age by telephone, mail, or the Internet. A person under 21 years of age who participates in these enforcement activities is immune from prosecution under any provision of law prohibiting the purchase of these products by a person under 21 years of age.
(d) In accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department shall adopt and publish guidelines for the use of persons under 21 years of age in inspections conducted pursuant to subdivision (c) that shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(1) An enforcing agency may use persons under 21 years of age in random inspections to determine if sales of cigarettes or other tobacco products are being made to persons under 21 years of age.
(2) A photograph or video recording of the person under 21 years of age shall be taken prior to each inspection or shift of inspections and retained by the enforcing agency for purposes of verifying appearances.
(3) An enforcing agency may use video recording equipment when conducting the inspections to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(4) The person under 21 years of age, if questioned about his or her age, need not state his or her actual age but shall present a true and correct identification if verbally asked to present it. Any failure on the part of the person under 21 years of age to provide true and correct identification, if verbally asked for it, shall be a defense to an action pursuant to this section.
(5) The person under 21 years of age shall be under the supervision of a regularly employed peace officer during the inspection.
(6) All persons under 21 years of age used in this manner by an enforcing agency shall display the appearance of a person under 21 years of age. It shall be a defense to an action under this division that the person’s appearance was not that which could be generally expected of a person under 21 years of age, under the actual circumstances presented to the seller of the cigarettes or other tobacco products at the time of the alleged offense.
In California it's under 21...
I did not say it was not deemed a Tobacco Product my suggestion was to sell 1 to 2 ML bottles for sampling. That satisfies the SKU and taxation issues.